ResidentSadist -> -=Do you fuck the crazy ones?=- (6/11/2012 6:58:56 PM)
|
While reflecting on my own comment, “Maybe the fact a girl looks crazy enough to have sex with livestock shouldn't be a feature I count in the plus column?”, I recalled how many of my friends say I collect “dangerous pets” for lovers. To them, the things my lovers did were 'over the edge' and denoted a lack of morals or sensibility as they viewed it. To me, yes they were a bit wild, but that was what made them interesting and fun. As mentioned in the other thread about morals & limits, I tossed mine out and enjoyed myself. I say “I am a very jaded old fuck”, but the truth of the matter is I have always been a jaded fuck, even when I was young. My sex life actively started at an age too young to mention. By the time I reached age of consent, I was already entrenched in BDSM, had a collared submissive masochist and was living in my own place with her as a poly primary pair. I started my journey into the world of relationships and sexual exploration a bit left of center so to speak. Over the years I have a chosen a few lovers based more on our mutual goals and mutual interests than on the sensibility they displayed. Sometimes I took the wild girl that would fuck a ____ while I _____ as everyone else _____. <insert random TOS acts at will> It really was quite a lot of fun with the crazy ones that were capable almost anything. I truly enjoyed my time with those pretty girls that were off their rockers. I really did keep some in cages or chained . . . and I confess that it's not just because of the romantic BDSM aspects but for a few, it doubled as safety measure too. Have you ever taken a lover of questionable sensibility because they slaked your lusts and shared your kinks . . . do you fuck the crazy ones? If so, do often find them to be more fun than the 'sane' ones sometimes? Will you choose the 'wild ones' again?
|
|
|
|