Proprietrix
Posts: 756
Joined: 7/15/2005 From: Ohio/West Virginia Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DragonslairHouse I am a trainer, and I have to say those who have not been under a trainers hands miss something I must say because I have been without searching and I have been with and been trained both have thier pros and cons. But each person to thier own your going to believe what your going to believe. Formalized servitude is rare these days and that is where the old schools come into play... Most these days just want to play and get laid which is so sad because the lifestyle isn't about that at all. Those are just its rewards. But there is a difference in training someone formalized servitude and the universal "training a newbie". If I want my submissive to set the table in elite fashion, serve from one side, clear from the other, kneel in a certain manner, etc… then I will teach them those specific skills. Those are particular manners in which I want my partner to do things in our particular relationship, and the two of us do because it pleases us both to do so. That is a far cry different than "training" someone (usually a casual acquaintance or online pal, and usually based on one’s orientation in the lifestyle rather than rapport) how to "be in the lifestyle". There is no way to "be a submissive". It totally and completely depends on the dynamics of individual relationships. You say you’re a trainer. What made you one? Did you just give yourself that label? Wouldn’t it be more fitting to just say that you are willing to teach people specific things that you like and believe? That you’re willing to teach a submissive the way you like them to serve you, the way you like them to set the dinner table, the way you prefer your submissives to act? You might train a newbie that they should begin every sentence with "Sir". Then they wander Mr. X’s way to find out that he thinks that’s really ridiculous and redundant. You could train submissives that they are entitled to their limits, then they wander Ms. Domly’s way and find out that she doesn’t even use the word "limit" in her vocabulary because all of her encounters are based on mutual consent in the first place. There are trainers out there teaching submissives tons of things that simply don’t apply beyond that particular trainer’s relationships. BDSM isn’t a skill that can be trained. It’s interaction between human beings based on diverse dynamics. Just like in vanilla interactions, there are no universal rules to be followed. There are no universal rules to be taught. You can put all your time effort and hard work into teaching a submissive that she has the right to voice her opinion, she has the right to request that her needs be met, set limits for herself, and be more than someone’s fucktoy or property. That all goes right out the window the instant that she realizes she wants to be objectified, used as a fucktoy, and give up all limits. What was the point? All you really taught her is how you prefer your submissives are treated. And maybe you threw in a dash of shame because now she has this preconceived notion that what she desires is not "ok" according to "her training". If I’m going to "teach someone the lifestyle", really all I’m teaching them is what I know, what I believe, and what I prefer. And it’s the exact same thing when anyone else teaches someone the lifestyle. Just like in vanilla relationships, there are no "trainers". Only people who are willing to teach their own preferences and beliefs. Just like vanilla relationships, there are no ubiquitous truths to be taught.
_____________________________
IMO, IMHO, YMMV, AFAIK, to me, I see it as, from my perspective, it's been my experience, I only speak for myself, (and all other disclaimers here).
|