tj444
Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BenevolentM I am now further into the Peter Schiff's view of Obamacare video that was provided by tj444. I don't buy his rebuttal to burden is not a relevant criteria when determining whether or not something is a tax or a penalty. When he said income taxes are high, for the most part they are not prohibitively high though they may be uncomfortably high. I agree that ObamaCare may be pollyannish, but the Supreme Court apparently feels that the law has merit. Whether or not the law got the particulars right is something they are willing to overlook. As I pointed out in Affordable Care Act and Its Implementation the Supreme Court was sold on the idea of hope, the hope for a better future. What scares me about it is that the govt is in bed with Big Pharma, the insurance corps and HMOs.. the profit motive will be the downfall of Obamacare, imo.. In Canada, the costs are regulated by the govt, its not the corps that dictate to govt like it is here.. The idea of "hope" is all well and good but in reality it will be "profit" that will run the show, imo..
_____________________________
As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”
|