Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The African American Community


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The African American Community Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The African American Community - 7/13/2012 2:48:21 PM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion
"Sorry, but there are more white people on AFDC than black people." What is the percentage of blacks in America? What is the percentage of whites in America? Since there are a MUCH higher percentage of white people in America, of course there are more whites on AFDC. But PERCENTAGE wise, blacks RULE AFDC. If you didn't know this, now would be a good time to bad mouth your school district.


Read up. Yattie was saying that there was a special "Field" that only blacks were allowed to play on......I don't really care about the numbers. The program is for anyone that is qualified



Might I quote myself within context -

Perhaps because, beginning at least back in the 60s

Initially the Civil Rights field, as established in the 60s, was aimed solely at the black community. That it later encompassed other minorities is irrelevant.
That field, though having good intentions, actually lowered the bar for the black community's access to various venues.

As a NOW website states,

The actual phrase "affirmative action" was first used in President John F. Kennedy's 1961 Executive Order 10925 which requires federal contractors to "take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin."

The same language was later used in Lyndon Johnson's 1965 Executive Order 11246.

In 1967, Johnson expanded the Executive Order to include affirmative action requirements to benefit women.

Other equal protection laws passed to make discrimination illegal were the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Title II and VII of which forbid racial discrimination in "public accommodations" and race and sex discrimination in employment, respectively; and the 1965 Voting Rights Act adopted after Congress found "that racial discrimination in voting was an insidious and pervasive evil which had been perpetuated in certain parts of the country through unremitting and ingenious defiance of the Constitution."


The unintended consequence was the eventual lowering of the bar for minority applicants. With the pressure of the Courts in seeing that minorities became better represented in various venues it became necessary for i.e. employers to accept a lesser qualified candidate, under what is now termed diversity, else be charged with discrimination. This eventually found its way even into the school system.

AFDC was a direct result of the Civil Rights movement. Mr.Rogers is correct -

Yes, partisans, it is as simple at that. That removed dad from all poor families where he was unemployed...long enough. There goes the poor family structure.

Add to that, rampant discrimination in education, work and wages, so the state enlarges and seals the fate of a virtually permanent underclass.


AFDC was most harmful to the black community, far above that of the white. Good intentions gone bad.

As to work and wages, and especially education, in the attempt to fix the rampant discrimination in education, work and wages, it became necessary to focus on race and not ability. The unintended consequence was the bar being lowered. It has been continually going lower ever since.

Now Mr.Rogers, with whom I most often highly disagree with, stated it differently yet the result is the same -

And of course despite the wishes of many, no one was removed from any playing field, the playing field was re-tilted in favor of those who found it...all up hill for 250 years.

The playing field, though, never change for the whites.

Given where we are now, I'm quite certain the cure was more detrimental than the disease.

So, many will slam what I say. But I ask you this. How's it working out so far?

_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to DomYngBlk)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: The African American Community - 7/13/2012 2:54:05 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Lay some of those percentages on us with credible citations, something I have never seen you to possess.

\

I have a feeling you would need an anal probe to locate the spot where most of his ideas come from.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: The African American Community - 7/13/2012 4:57:51 PM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion
"Sorry, but there are more white people on AFDC than black people." What is the percentage of blacks in America? What is the percentage of whites in America? Since there are a MUCH higher percentage of white people in America, of course there are more whites on AFDC. But PERCENTAGE wise, blacks RULE AFDC. If you didn't know this, now would be a good time to bad mouth your school district.


Read up. Yattie was saying that there was a special "Field" that only blacks were allowed to play on......I don't really care about the numbers. The program is for anyone that is qualified



Might I quote myself within context -

Perhaps because, beginning at least back in the 60s

Initially the Civil Rights field, as established in the 60s, was aimed solely at the black community. That it later encompassed other minorities is irrelevant.
That field, though having good intentions, actually lowered the bar for the black community's access to various venues.

As
a NOW website states,

The actual phrase "affirmative action" was first used in President John F. Kennedy's 1961 Executive Order 10925 which requires federal contractors to "take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin."

The same language was later used in Lyndon Johnson's 1965 Executive Order 11246.

In 1967, Johnson expanded the Executive Order to include affirmative action requirements to benefit women.

Other equal protection laws passed to make discrimination illegal were the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Title II and VII of which forbid racial discrimination in "public accommodations" and race and sex discrimination in employment, respectively; and the 1965 Voting Rights Act adopted after Congress found "that racial discrimination in voting was an insidious and pervasive evil which had been perpetuated in certain parts of the country through unremitting and ingenious defiance of the Constitution."


The unintended consequence was the eventual lowering of the bar for minority applicants. With the pressure of the Courts in seeing that minorities became better represented in various venues it became necessary for i.e. employers to accept a lesser qualified candidate, under what is now termed diversity, else be charged with discrimination. This eventually found its way even into the school system.

AFDC was a direct result of the Civil Rights movement. Mr.Rogers is correct -

Yes, partisans, it is as simple at that. That removed dad from all poor families where he was unemployed...long enough. There goes the poor family structure.

Add to that, rampant discrimination in education, work and wages, so the state enlarges and seals the fate of a virtually permanent underclass.


AFDC was most harmful to the black community, far above that of the white. Good intentions gone bad.

As to work and wages, and especially education, in the attempt to fix the rampant discrimination in education, work and wages, it became necessary to focus on race and not ability. The unintended consequence was the bar being lowered. It has been continually going lower ever since.

Now Mr.Rogers, with whom I most often highly disagree with, stated it differently yet the result is the same -

And of course despite the wishes of many, no one was removed from any playing field, the playing field was re-tilted in favor of those who found it...all up hill for 250 years.

The playing field, though, never change for the whites.

Given where we are now, I'm quite certain the cure was more detrimental than the disease.

So, many will slam what I say. But I ask you this. How's it working out so far?


Where to start. Oh yeah. So having equal protection under the Constitution of the United States of America is somehow putting blacks on a different playing field? Then if that is somehow wrong then we should just close the doors and start over.

The Executive orders you cite say race, creed, color or national origin. I don't see "Hey this is for black folk nobody else needs to worry" Huh?

AFDC didn't hurt black families, black people. Being kept from voting, from working equal for equal pay, from eating at the eating places, going to the same movie houses, not drinking from the same water fountains, not having the equality of an education or opportunity....that is what hurt and hurts black families.

Or maybe, really your point is if we'd just go back to slavery everything would work out this time.....

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: The African American Community - 7/13/2012 5:21:44 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: xBullx

So in the end this election is going to be about race?



(Isn't it always?)

(in reply to xBullx)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: The African American Community - 7/13/2012 5:23:00 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KyttynTheMynx

*Looks at the roof over my head, the clothes on my back, shoes on my feet, and various little treasures that I have accumulated over the years*

I am suffering how?

Seriously though, perhaps you shouldnt cover us all in the "Suffering More, Gain Less, Doing Worse" blanket. Granted, I am not a 25 year old millionaire like I had wished to be at 15, but I am doing quite well.


I just want to say, I always loved you more than any other woman.

(in reply to KyttynTheMynx)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: The African American Community - 7/13/2012 5:24:07 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: xBullx


I've actually noted that the only time anyone politically minded wants to discuss race issues is when it furthers their agenda and that's about where it stops and starts. Solutions are the least of their concern.

I'm might be a nut, but the only way I think there will be an end to the "racial divide" is when it isn't so popular and beneficial to have it.


Yepper.

(in reply to xBullx)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: The African American Community - 7/13/2012 5:25:10 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

Do you want to spell out what "special" field that only blacks inhabit?



I have heard that LEO often take a special interest in them. Is that what you meant?


And why do you think that is?

Perhaps the %'s?

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: The African American Community - 7/13/2012 5:26:35 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

LEO? No, wondering what yattie meant


Law Enforcement Officers.

(in reply to DomYngBlk)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: The African American Community - 7/13/2012 5:28:19 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

he doesnt care about facts, he comes in to drop a load and then disappears without a source until his next load, seems to be a regular occurrance amongst a few idiots recently.


I couldn't care less what we're talking about now....I want that fucking ass Lucy.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: The African American Community - 7/13/2012 5:31:40 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

Where to start. Oh yeah. So having equal protection under the Constitution of the United States of America is somehow putting blacks on a different playing field? Then if that is somehow wrong then we should just close the doors and start over.

The Executive orders you cite say race, creed, color or national origin. I don't see "Hey this is for black folk nobody else needs to worry" Huh?

AFDC didn't hurt black families, black people. Being kept from voting, from working equal for equal pay, from eating at the eating places, going to the same movie houses, not drinking from the same water fountains, not having the equality of an education or opportunity....that is what hurt and hurts black families.

Or maybe, really your point is if we'd just go back to slavery everything would work out this time.....


Ya know what DYB...I kinda thought you were moving in the direction of ..."let the fuck go....it's your gig, not mine"....but that last bit was all about anger and "fuck you".

Ya know what....it is all about let the fuck go....it's over. It's all about desire and drive....you clearly have it so don't get caught up....just succeed. Want it? Get it.

(in reply to DomYngBlk)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: The African American Community - 7/13/2012 5:42:22 PM   
xBullx


Posts: 4206
Joined: 10/8/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: xBullx

So in the end this election is going to be about race?



(Isn't it always?)


Not for me, it was important to my father that I judge a man, any man, looking into his eyes and no where else. I thank him for that.

I am tired of all the lies and you can close your eyes and see that they are all doing that.

Only we can hold their feet to the flame, and watching this site, and a few others I go to, divided we fall seems almost certain anymore. No one wants to reason with the idiots. Problem is, everyone sees nothing but idiots when they look around.

_____________________________

Live well,

Bull



I'm not an asshole; I'm simply resolute...

"A Republic, If You Can Keep It."

Caution: My humor is a bit skewed.

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: The African American Community - 7/13/2012 5:55:29 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: xBullx


quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: xBullx

So in the end this election is going to be about race?



(Isn't it always?)


Not for me, it was important to my father that I judge a man, any man, looking into his eyes and no where else. I thank him for that.

I am tired of all the lies and you can close your eyes and see that they are all doing that.

Only we can hold their feet to the flame, and watching this site, and a few others I go to, divided we fall seems almost certain anymore. No one wants to reason with the idiots. Problem is, everyone sees nothing but idiots when they look around.


I actually didn't understand any of that, but....I have an IQ of a potato.

(in reply to xBullx)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: The African American Community - 7/13/2012 6:02:52 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk
Do you want to spell out what "special" field that only blacks inhabit?


Are there no special considerations (as per the question) granted the black community based solely upon race?


So why do 16 % of African American children suffer from Asthma....4 times more than white kids......doctor?


Please, take your time.


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: The African American Community - 7/13/2012 6:04:13 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: xBullx

So in the end this election is going to be about race?



(Isn't it always?)

Tell us oh cons......

When hasn`t it been?

According to Mitten`s......blacks are suffering 14 % unemployment.....

So who`s bringing up race?

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 7/13/2012 6:05:54 PM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: The African American Community - 7/13/2012 6:10:43 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: xBullx

So in the end this election is going to be about race?



(Isn't it always?)

Tell us oh cons......

When hasn`t it been?

According to Mitten`s......blacks are suffering 14 % unemployment.....

So who`s bringing up race?



Lemme think here....just a second here.....gawdammit....I'm slipping in my old age....uhhhh.....

FUCK!!!! It's you!.

(Shit, I thought I had a better answer).



< Message edited by LookieNoNookie -- 7/13/2012 6:11:04 PM >

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: The African American Community - 7/13/2012 6:15:51 PM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion
"Sorry, but there are more white people on AFDC than black people." What is the percentage of blacks in America? What is the percentage of whites in America? Since there are a MUCH higher percentage of white people in America, of course there are more whites on AFDC. But PERCENTAGE wise, blacks RULE AFDC. If you didn't know this, now would be a good time to bad mouth your school district.


Read up. Yattie was saying that there was a special "Field" that only blacks were allowed to play on......I don't really care about the numbers. The program is for anyone that is qualified



Might I quote myself within context -

Perhaps because, beginning at least back in the 60s

Initially the Civil Rights field, as established in the 60s, was aimed solely at the black community. That it later encompassed other minorities is irrelevant.
That field, though having good intentions, actually lowered the bar for the black community's access to various venues.

As
a NOW website states,

The actual phrase "affirmative action" was first used in President John F. Kennedy's 1961 Executive Order 10925 which requires federal contractors to "take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin."

The same language was later used in Lyndon Johnson's 1965 Executive Order 11246.

In 1967, Johnson expanded the Executive Order to include affirmative action requirements to benefit women.

Other equal protection laws passed to make discrimination illegal were the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Title II and VII of which forbid racial discrimination in "public accommodations" and race and sex discrimination in employment, respectively; and the 1965 Voting Rights Act adopted after Congress found "that racial discrimination in voting was an insidious and pervasive evil which had been perpetuated in certain parts of the country through unremitting and ingenious defiance of the Constitution."


The unintended consequence was the eventual lowering of the bar for minority applicants. With the pressure of the Courts in seeing that minorities became better represented in various venues it became necessary for i.e. employers to accept a lesser qualified candidate, under what is now termed diversity, else be charged with discrimination. This eventually found its way even into the school system.

AFDC was a direct result of the Civil Rights movement. Mr.Rogers is correct -

Yes, partisans, it is as simple at that. That removed dad from all poor families where he was unemployed...long enough. There goes the poor family structure.

Add to that, rampant discrimination in education, work and wages, so the state enlarges and seals the fate of a virtually permanent underclass.


AFDC was most harmful to the black community, far above that of the white. Good intentions gone bad.

As to work and wages, and especially education, in the attempt to fix the rampant discrimination in education, work and wages, it became necessary to focus on race and not ability. The unintended consequence was the bar being lowered. It has been continually going lower ever since.

Now Mr.Rogers, with whom I most often highly disagree with, stated it differently yet the result is the same -

And of course despite the wishes of many, no one was removed from any playing field, the playing field was re-tilted in favor of those who found it...all up hill for 250 years.

The playing field, though, never change for the whites.

Given where we are now, I'm quite certain the cure was more detrimental than the disease.

So, many will slam what I say. But I ask you this. How's it working out so far?


Where to start. Oh yeah. So having equal protection under the Constitution of the United States of America is somehow putting blacks on a different playing field? Then if that is somehow wrong then we should just close the doors and start over.

The Executive orders you cite say race, creed, color or national origin. I don't see "Hey this is for black folk nobody else needs to worry" Huh?

AFDC didn't hurt black families, black people. Being kept from voting, from working equal for equal pay, from eating at the eating places, going to the same movie houses, not drinking from the same water fountains, not having the equality of an education or opportunity....that is what hurt and hurts black families.

Or maybe, really your point is if we'd just go back to slavery everything would work out this time.....



I do hope you're smarter than that.

P1. What was afforded was not EQUAL protection but un-EQUAL protection which by that very inequality separated the black community into its own special class. Certain aspects of the civil rights movement are commendable. But other aspects were cheered when they should have been jeered for the affront to the black community that they were.

P2. So, those were created in response to whites being discriminated against?

P3. So are you saying that, as Mr.Rogers put it, That removed dad from all poor families where he was unemployed...long enough. There goes the poor family structure. is not highly relevant seeing as it hit the black community hardest?

Being kept from voting, from working equal for equal pay, from eating at the eating places, going to the same movie houses, not drinking from the same water fountains, not having the equality of an education or opportunity....that is what hurt and hurts black families.

Voting, pay, eating, drinking, movies... those were laudable but chickenfeed against the rest. With education comes opportunity. Hard to get ahead or take advantage of opportunity while stupid. So, which is better - raise the educational level of the black community (raise their bar) or lower it? Does the bar rise or fall when one is subject to, and I'll quote Mr.Rogers again, And of course despite the wishes of many, no one was removed from any playing field, the playing field was re-tilted in favor of those who found it...all up hill for 250 years.

In case you have not noticed, kids coming out of school are dumber than ever. And that is now both black and white. So much is being focused on education these days simply because what once worked is now broken. That is what happens when the bar gets lowered as to accommodate preferential treatment.

Here's an example -

The U.S. Department of Justice recently ordered Dayton, Ohio's police department to lower its written exam passing scores so as to have more blacks on its police force.

Dayton NAACP President Derrick Forward said:

If you lower the score for any group of people, you’re not getting the best qualified people for the job. … The NAACP does not support individuals failing a test and then having the opportunity to be gainfully employed.


There's a real world example for you. You didn't get equality. You got just the opposite and the black community suffers under it still today.





_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to DomYngBlk)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: The African American Community - 7/13/2012 6:16:06 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk
Do you want to spell out what "special" field that only blacks inhabit?


Are there no special considerations (as per the question) granted the black community based solely upon race?


So why do 16 % of African American children suffer from Asthma....4 times more than white kids
......doctor?


Please, take your time.



Fuck if I know...do you?

Why do they have sickle cell anemia more than anyone else? I haven't a damned clue...I'm not a doctor (I just play one on AOL).

Why are old people more likely to have Alzheimer's disease? Hell if I know.

Why are stupid people more likely to ask stupid questions.

I'll be gawdammed if I know...but it is a motherfucking fact.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: The African American Community - 7/13/2012 6:18:21 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion
"Sorry, but there are more white people on AFDC than black people." What is the percentage of blacks in America? What is the percentage of whites in America? Since there are a MUCH higher percentage of white people in America, of course there are more whites on AFDC. But PERCENTAGE wise, blacks RULE AFDC. If you didn't know this, now would be a good time to bad mouth your school district.


Read up. Yattie was saying that there was a special "Field" that only blacks were allowed to play on......I don't really care about the numbers. The program is for anyone that is qualified



Might I quote myself within context -

Perhaps because, beginning at least back in the 60s

Initially the Civil Rights field, as established in the 60s, was aimed solely at the black community. That it later encompassed other minorities is irrelevant.
That field, though having good intentions, actually lowered the bar for the black community's access to various venues.

As
a NOW website states,

The actual phrase "affirmative action" was first used in President John F. Kennedy's 1961 Executive Order 10925 which requires federal contractors to "take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin."

The same language was later used in Lyndon Johnson's 1965 Executive Order 11246.

In 1967, Johnson expanded the Executive Order to include affirmative action requirements to benefit women.

Other equal protection laws passed to make discrimination illegal were the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Title II and VII of which forbid racial discrimination in "public accommodations" and race and sex discrimination in employment, respectively; and the 1965 Voting Rights Act adopted after Congress found "that racial discrimination in voting was an insidious and pervasive evil which had been perpetuated in certain parts of the country through unremitting and ingenious defiance of the Constitution."


The unintended consequence was the eventual lowering of the bar for minority applicants. With the pressure of the Courts in seeing that minorities became better represented in various venues it became necessary for i.e. employers to accept a lesser qualified candidate, under what is now termed diversity, else be charged with discrimination. This eventually found its way even into the school system.

AFDC was a direct result of the Civil Rights movement. Mr.Rogers is correct -

Yes, partisans, it is as simple at that. That removed dad from all poor families where he was unemployed...long enough. There goes the poor family structure.

Add to that, rampant discrimination in education, work and wages, so the state enlarges and seals the fate of a virtually permanent underclass.


AFDC was most harmful to the black community, far above that of the white. Good intentions gone bad.

As to work and wages, and especially education, in the attempt to fix the rampant discrimination in education, work and wages, it became necessary to focus on race and not ability. The unintended consequence was the bar being lowered. It has been continually going lower ever since.

Now Mr.Rogers, with whom I most often highly disagree with, stated it differently yet the result is the same -

And of course despite the wishes of many, no one was removed from any playing field, the playing field was re-tilted in favor of those who found it...all up hill for 250 years.

The playing field, though, never change for the whites.

Given where we are now, I'm quite certain the cure was more detrimental than the disease.

So, many will slam what I say. But I ask you this. How's it working out so far?


Where to start. Oh yeah. So having equal protection under the Constitution of the United States of America is somehow putting blacks on a different playing field? Then if that is somehow wrong then we should just close the doors and start over.

The Executive orders you cite say race, creed, color or national origin. I don't see "Hey this is for black folk nobody else needs to worry" Huh?

AFDC didn't hurt black families, black people. Being kept from voting, from working equal for equal pay, from eating at the eating places, going to the same movie houses, not drinking from the same water fountains, not having the equality of an education or opportunity....that is what hurt and hurts black families.

Or maybe, really your point is if we'd just go back to slavery everything would work out this time.....



I do hope you're smarter than that.

P1. What was afforded was not EQUAL protection but un-EQUAL protection which by that very inequality separated the black community into its own special class. Certain aspects of the civil rights movement are commendable. But other aspects were cheered when they should have been jeered for the affront to the black community that they were.

P2. So, those were created in response to whites being discriminated against?

P3. So are you saying that, as Mr.Rogers put it, That removed dad from all poor families where he was unemployed...long enough. There goes the poor family structure. is not highly relevant seeing as it hit the black community hardest?

Being kept from voting, from working equal for equal pay, from eating at the eating places, going to the same movie houses, not drinking from the same water fountains, not having the equality of an education or opportunity....that is what hurt and hurts black families.

Voting, pay, eating, drinking, movies... those were laudable but chickenfeed against the rest. With education comes opportunity. Hard to get ahead or take advantage of opportunity while stupid. So, which is better - raise the educational level of the black community (raise their bar) or lower it? Does the bar rise or fall when one is subject to, and I'll quote Mr.Rogers again, And of course despite the wishes of many, no one was removed from any playing field, the playing field was re-tilted in favor of those who found it...all up hill for 250 years.

In case you have not noticed, kids coming out of school are dumber than ever. And that is now both black and white. So much is being focused on education these days simply because what once worked is now broken. That is what happens when the bar gets lowered as to accommodate preferential treatment.

Here's an example -

The U.S. Department of Justice recently ordered Dayton, Ohio's police department to lower its written exam passing scores so as to have more blacks on its police force.

Dayton NAACP President Derrick Forward said:

If you lower the score for any group of people, you’re not getting the best qualified people for the job. … The NAACP does not support individuals failing a test and then having the opportunity to be gainfully employed.


There's a real world example for you. You didn't get equality. You got just the opposite and the black community suffers under it still today.




Jeeeeeez......another poster confusing people with facts.

(When will it end?)

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: The African American Community - 7/13/2012 6:30:33 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: xBullx

So in the end this election is going to be about race?



(Isn't it always?)

Tell us oh cons......

When hasn`t it been?

According to Mitten`s......blacks are suffering 14 % unemployment.....

So who`s bringing up race?



Lemme think here....just a second here.....gawdammit....I'm slipping in my old age....uhhhh.....

FUCK!!!! It's you!.

(Shit, I thought I had a better answer).




Romeny...... brought it up......professor.....at the NAACP convention......

We`re discussing it.....

Try to keep up.....

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: The African American Community - 7/13/2012 6:43:37 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
After the NAACP convention, Romney told a group of Montana Republican donors what he thought of those at the 103rd Annual NAACP convention who booed his promise to bring down the Affordable Care Act: "If they want more stuff from government tell them to go vote for the other guy -- more free stuff. But don't forget nothing is really free."





< Message edited by kalikshama -- 7/13/2012 6:46:10 PM >


_____________________________

Curious about the "Sluts Vote" avatars? See http://www.collarchat.com/m_4133036/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#4133036

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The African American Community Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109