xssve
Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009 Status: offline
|
For he most part it's a self definition, a legal definition is very different - thus there are no real hard fast external markers to determine the difference between slave and submissive, with BDSM paraxis, they're both submissive, and to what degree is largely matter of personality, and while certainly individuals and groups of individuals may have very clear cut definitions of their own, ultimately, short of a legal definition, it's a subjective definiton, period - end of discussion. As if, lol, at least until next week. I would have to say to identify as a slave however, indicates more of a desire to submerge the ego entirely, to become an extension of another's will, whereas identifying as a submissive indicates some desire to retain a more of an independent ego identity. It might be loosely compared to the difference between attending church, uh, religiously, or becoming a nun. But, that's again, a generalization, there is a bit of a frisson of romance about the notion of slavery that women find attractive, so it might just be part of the fantasy, conversely, a submissive masochist might seem more like a slave than a slave, there just is no way to objectively define it. Now it may be that the "real" slaves feel they've gone so far they simply have no other options, and that's probably as close to a legal definition as it gets without crossing the line - then again, cat lady is an option, just not an attractive one maybe, I dunno. I guess you could be a slave to your own perverted desires, if so, CM me, be glad to help you out with that.
_____________________________
Walking nightmare...
|