RacerJim -> RE: "Mitt" Romney: Piece of Shit DRAFT DODGER... (8/6/2012 1:18:36 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SilverMark Protest is often the most sincere form of Patriotisim.... Addressed communist organized, ANTI-WAR rallies...He was not advocating Communism, he was advocating the stopping of an unjust war, perpetrated by a LIE, and prosecuted by AMERICAN youths at the direction of a misguided government, based on a theory.....in plain terms The Viet Nam War was BULLSHIT! How many assassinations were carried out?.... Was his knowledge DIRECT? If so, why no prosecution for conspiracy? Possible....love that word...."that may be true or may be the case, as something concerning which one has no knowledge to the contrary" I'd hang him for POSSIBLE... "When he met with representatives of the North Vietnamese government and subsequently presented the communist plan for US withdrawl to the congress, was he doing that to ridicule the communists?" I doubt ridicule was his intent, but perhaps stopping a war might have been, you would have preferred that the war last even longer? Was he giving aid to an enemy? If so , why was he not prosecuted? Sound bites make for a weak argument, when at the time most of what is said in your response was and is illegal, yet no prosecution, could it be, there was very little evidence? Conjecture does not make for a good prosecution, now does it? Really doesn't even make a good debate. Where's that umpire? Active duty military personnel protesting a war, especially in uniform, has always been a serious violation of the UCMJ...punishable by Courts Martial, reduction in rank, fine, imprisonment, "Dishonorable" (enlisted personnel) or "Less Than Honorable" (officers) discharge and loss of any/all benefits. Kerry was the COMMUNIST PARTY OF AMERICA's VVAW spokesperson at ANTI-WAR rallies and on Capitol Hill...he may not have been advocating Communism but he definitely was advocating Communist North Vietnam's demands...that we/South Vietnam accept NVA's terms for ending a war which they had started and we had effectly won during the Spring '68 TeT Offensive..."misguided, based on a [Domino] theory" my ass...within a year of our ending our involvement in Vietnam, Communist North Vietnam had invaded and taken over South Vietnam and murdered several million more Vietnamese than had been killed during the war itself, and soon also took over Cambodia and Laos (proving the Domino theory was not misguided)...in plain English your opinions of the Vietnam War and John Kerry are BULLSHIT! "How many assassinations were carried out?"...love your obfuscating the issue...a Communist organization for which Kerry was the national spokesperson developed plans to assassinate several prominent politicians and you give him a pass because they didn't carry out any assassinations. Kerry himself said he left the VVAW's "Winter Soldier" meeting in Chicago as soon as they began discussing those assassinations...therefore I'd say he did indeed have DIRECT knowledge. Why no prosecution for conspiracy? Politics. Treason: aiding and abeting the enemy...I love that definition...punishable by execution...I love that punishment...I'd hang John F. Kerry and Jane Fonda for TREASON. The U.S. Constitution contains no allowance for the purpose/reason Kerry met with the North Vietnamese leadership and subsequently encouraged the U.S. government to accept North Vietnam's terms of U.S. withdrawal...doing so constituted treason (aiding and abeting the enemy), plain and simple. Since we had already won the war on the battlefields I would have preferred Kerry to have encouraged North Vietnam to accept President Nixon's "Peace With Honor" terms of surrender, which not only would have ended the war several years before it did but also would have prevented North Vietnamese Communists from taking over not only South Vietnam but Cambodia and Laos as well. Why no prosecution? Politics. Why no prosecution makes for a very weak arguement, especially when you can't refute the truth. Obfuscation and/or misguided opinion does not make for credible debate. The umpire is right here...Truth B. Told. Apparantly you're blind.
|
|
|
|