topcat
Posts: 1675
Joined: 1/31/2004 From: Tidewater, VA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: topcat quote:
ORIGINAL: VanillaKinkie I wonder if anyone can give me advice on the following topic. If a rule has been agreed and set in place, where permission is require from a Dom/Master by the sub/slave to consume alcohol, what would your views as a Dom/me. sub/slave be to the following situation. The sub/slave has arranged with a vanilla friend to go out for a social evenning where drinking may be involved. The sub/slave cannot contact their Dom/Master to gain permission to be allowed to consume alcohol. However informs her Dom/Master in an email she plans to go out. What should the sub/slave do ? Do rules like this become void as there is a communication issue ? What should the Dom/Masters point of view be ? Thank you for taking time to read this and any advice given VK Dominant Fail. To set broadly worded rules, without allowing for contingencies, is poor leadership. To attempt to micro- manage, and then not be available, is poor leadership. BOTH sides of the power dynamic are responsible for standing orders. If a rule requires the dominants permission to be granted, the dominant is obligated to be accessible to give that permission, or to set conditions that will grant permission in their absence. While it may be impossible to foresee all situations that might arise, this particular one should have been thought of, and would seem to be fairly simple to cover with a 'use your best judgement' clause. In re-reading the thread at leisure, I do see the opposing points that are being made, re: the Submissive possibly having issues that required such a rule to be made, which would have put a different spin on things than my assumptions- that the rule was in place for the purpose of making a rule for her to follow to remind her of their dynamic and reinforce it. If it were the case that there was an actual issue related to drinking, it would fall under Rule One (protect the property), and that I will not brook. However, in handing down the big three, I make it clear that these rules are inviolate, and that rule one includes such tangentials as diet, exercise, safe driving habits, situational awareness, etc.,. But really, IMO, if I give an order that is not obeyed, *I* have failed. Even in a case of willful disobedience, I failed myself in entrusting the subordinate with a task when they were not worthy of my regard. So! one way or another, I still call Dominant Fail. If you want the Authority, you must take the Responsibility.
_____________________________
-there is no remission without blood-
|