TheHeretic -> RE: 100% wind, water, solar power possible (8/15/2012 10:05:04 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam Im aware that. A lot of canals go alongside roads but a lot dont. the ones that dont are the key. S Florida is very similar as most of the roads are built on fill dredged out of the canals. That's a shitload of $ to be made there with almost zero environmental impact. No kangaroo rats or gopher tortoises are inconvenienced and theres a shitpile oF ca$h to be made. Raw Capitali$m Bullshit, Hillwilliam. It's a massive load of unnecessary expense, except, as I noted first, in a land poor environment. Much, much, easier and cheaper to acquire out of use farmland, and we have LOTS of that in the central valley, and get the same benefit of not having to worry about disturbing native species Gee, similar OSHA requirements to building a dam or bridge. Well, those won't add a nickel to construction cost, will they? Especially when the option is just to require steel toes, reflective vests, and hard hats, for crews working on dry land? The structure is plainly visible, reflected in the water. That's going to keep all the moisture contained underneath? Just to really mess it up, besides the moisture to turn dust and airborne particulate into a harder to clean crust on the surface of the panel, lets add the electical connections being in a higher humidity environment, and then factor in the birds and bugs that are going to be drawn to the area for water, and the impact they'll have on keeping the panels clean. Now if you want something practical, that works, the latest trend here is installing shade structures over parking lots, with the panels on top of those. No additional land gets used, there is a direct, quality of life, side benefit for people who don't have to get into 140 degrees cars at 5:00 (saves gas as well, since the a/c doesn't have to work as hard), and they aren't hideously ugly.
|
|
|
|