Aswad
Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam Sometimes you don't get invited and you have to be confident enough that, when it occurs, you dont feel threatened. Not being invited seems like the preferrable option, unless one is taking cabergoline or something similar to eliminate postclimactic fatigue. I figure I might feel rather inadequate if faced with the prospect of trying to satisfy two women, and somewhat redundant if they're taking care of each other well enough without me. Not necessarily an insurmountable obstacle, but I do think it would diminish overall enjoyment. I already find myself telling her to back off occasionally so I can focus on the action and not get swept up in some distracting orgasm and subsequent temporary fatigue. Orgasms are actually better by myself, particularly the third in a series. I haven't yet been able to have multiples with her while maintaining full participation in the action. Apart from a few fantasy acts whose duration would never suffice to satisfy all parties to the interaction, I can't really think of a reason to add another girl. Having one to take over when I've had my fill or need to rehydrate, maybe. Again, of course, this is with the caveat that it's only applicable in the absence of chemicals that bypass this particular disadvantage of being male. Using such substances, men can pretty much keep up in this regard, if they've learned to let go enough. That said, we've both already had interactions with other people, without both being present, and it hasn't been a problem. Not sure if that's got anything to do with confidence, though. IWYW, — Aswad.
_____________________________
"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind. From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way. We do." -- Rorschack, Watchmen.
|