Anaxagoras -> RE: Seven Mysteries of Profound Love, the NDE Experience (10/15/2012 5:27:59 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BenevolentM quote:
ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras quote:
ORIGINAL: BenevolentM Why do you claim that "suffering and evil have no place in a world created by a pure eternal divinity who is nothing other than good, ..." In the image of God, not the person of God. Why didn't God make me an equal? Put simply, equality is a lie. Its not a question about equality because (according to the old notions I mentioned) God is conceived as an eternal (i.e. everlasting rather than infinite) being of infinite capability (omnipotent), a being that exists outside of space and time. This is in stark contrast to human beings who are finite in every respect. From this Being all that is good emerges - creation and existence. Other than being a Being of infinite scope, and being intrinsically good, nothing else can be understood about God. This is pretty much the conception of God that developed with the emergence of Christianity from Late Antiquity and through the Medieval era, e.g with Anselm's ontological argument about God's existence. However, a problem emerges. It is the question of evil and its effects such as suffering. If God created all (both substance and form - sorry about the philosophical terms), the universe and everything within it, then how can the manifold manifestations of evil occur, since he is a being of infinite good from which all that is good within the world is drawn? Your argument has logical difficulties. I don't suppose you are familiar with the work of the mathematician George Cantor. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Cantor There exists things beyond even the infinite. So what I am accusing you of is having a naive understanding of the infinite. Your arguments are out-of-date. God created all that is real, but did not create that which is unreal. Our free will permits us to do that, however. Our free will allows us to partake of the forbidden fruit which are things not of God, to explore delusion. You don't understand the point since it wasn't truly based on the premise of the infinite. Neither would free will explain the prolific intensity of evil in the world if all creation came from a fundamentally good source. The words you use suggest you treat the contradicting points of others as part of a competition that you try to win, rather than considering them.
|
|
|
|