RE: Town Hall Debate

RE: Town Hall Debate (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Jenniferloves -> RE: Town Hall Debate (10/18/2012 5:49:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: Jenniferloves [ "Tell a lie often enough and with enough conviction, it becomes the truth" That is equally applicable for both far right and far left radio! I didn't say it wasn't didn't did I? By the way, if you were able to pay attention, you'd see that the statement that has your panties wrapped around your nutsack is in my sig line, not the post. Since when is someone's sigline part of the topic oh observant one? Your omission in your “Sig line” speaks volumes... perhaps that might answer your question on “I didn't say it wasn't didn't did I?” In regards to knickers being in a twist, think all can read clearly who is upset by your comments and responses to my posts...

tazzygirl -> RE: Town Hall Debate (10/18/2012 5:51:38 AM)
Im curious... since when does a Sig Line have to be politically correct?

Hillwilliam -> RE: Town Hall Debate (10/18/2012 5:56:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Im curious... since when does a Sig Line have to be politically correct? When whiners read it.

Jenniferloves -> RE: Town Hall Debate (10/18/2012 6:14:54 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Im curious... since when does a Sig Line have to be politically correct? When whiners read it. Amazing Hill.... nice answers throughout this thread and yet you accuse me of being a whiner? Let me remind you of your whining: So what's your fucking point? Does it have fuckall to do with the topic? Once again, I will leave it for others to make the judgement.

Hillwilliam -> RE: Town Hall Debate (10/18/2012 6:20:57 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jenniferloves quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Im curious... since when does a Sig Line have to be politically correct? When whiners read it. Amazing Hill.... nice answers throughout this thread and yet you accuse me of being a whiner? Let me remind you of your whining: So what's your fucking point? Does it have fuckall to do with the topic? Once again, I will leave it for others to make the judgement. That's pointing out that someone doesnt seem to be capable of discerning the difference between a sig line and the body of a topic. Again, do your comments on my sigline have fuckall to do with THIS topic? It's a simple yes, no question. You made an ignorant, off topic post and now you can't handle the fallout. Tough shit.

Jenniferloves -> RE: Town Hall Debate (10/18/2012 6:21:53 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Im curious... since when does a Sig Line have to be politically correct? I didn't say it did and usually I ignore them. But in a political forum thread, think its all fair game, as it appears in every post. Specifically to this thread, the question is The Town hall Debate... most gave their opinions on each respective candidate. It is natural to assume that an anti-political party ideology message on any part of the post would hardly be the bastion of objectivity.

Jenniferloves -> RE: Town Hall Debate (10/18/2012 6:27:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: Jenniferloves quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Im curious... since when does a Sig Line have to be politically correct? When whiners read it. Amazing Hill.... nice answers throughout this thread and yet you accuse me of being a whiner? Let me remind you of your whining: So what's your fucking point? Does it have fuckall to do with the topic? Once again, I will leave it for others to make the judgement. That's pointing out that someone doesnt seem to be capable of discerning the difference between a sig line and the body of a topic. Again, do your comments on my sigline have fuckall to do with THIS topic? It's a simple yes, no question. You made an ignorant, off topic post and now you can't handle the fallout. Tough shit. This is a political discussion forum and everything is up for debate, especially when your “sig line” has an anti right message or indeed if it had an anti-left message. Spit your dummy elsewhere, your sig line is political, I called you on it, albeit subtly and you fell for it...

Hillwilliam -> RE: Town Hall Debate (10/18/2012 6:30:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jenniferloves quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Im curious... since when does a Sig Line have to be politically correct? I didn't say it did and usually I ignore them. But in a political forum thread, think its all fair game, as it appears in every post. Specifically to this thread, the question is The Town hall Debate... most gave their opinions on each respective candidate. It is natural to assume that an anti-political party ideology message on any part of the post would hardly be the bastion of objectivity. What the fuck part of TOPIC do you not understand? A sig line is NOT part of a topic. Why don't you start a TOPIC having to do with sig lines? Here's some you can play with. "Progressives covet, via taxation, the property of others in the name of equality and fairness. Envy be their name." "If American women can increase their voting turnout by 10%, I think we can see an end to all the budget cuts in programs benefiting women and children" Coretta Scott King " "What I support: A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution Personal Responsibility Help for the truly needy Limited Government Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt" "Tinfoilers Swallow" All from this TOPIC. Face it, you got caught making a witless post and called on it and now you can't let go.[:D]

Hillwilliam -> RE: Town Hall Debate (10/18/2012 6:34:19 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jenniferloves Spit your dummy elsewhere, your sig line is political, I called you on it, albeit subtly and you fell for it...[/size] Yes, my sig line is political. So are most of the others. So what? It has nothing to do with what is being talked about here. Now get your undies out of a twist and learn about "OFF TOPIC" which is a violation of that TOS you agreed to when you signed up on the site. If you want to talk about sig lines and have people laughing at you, then start a new topic on them. Better yet, figure out how to add one of your own so you can laugh at some idiot in the future who doesn't realize it isnt part of your message and makes a fool of themselves.

Jenniferloves -> RE: Town Hall Debate (10/18/2012 6:36:49 AM)
I can't let go, after all that research you done on every tag line, it nearly is annoying for you to see me reply again... Have your point... and you say I can't let go?... tut, after that heroic effort you went to... I must concede to you [;)] Oh P.S. Political sig lines in a Political Thread in my opinion, are part of the conversation... but others may disagree,, you certainly do...[:)]

Hillwilliam -> RE: Town Hall Debate (10/18/2012 6:39:47 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jenniferloves I can't let go, after all that research you done on every tag line, it nearly is annoying for you to see me reply again... Have your point... and you say I can't let go?... tut, after that heroic effort you went to... I must concede to you [;)] Oh P.S. Political sig lines in a Political Thread in my opinion, are part of the conversation... but others may disagree,, you certainly do...[:)] They're just as much a part of the conversation as a letterhead is to the body of the letter. zilch Again, learn to put your own up and maybe you'll get lucky enough to have someone make stupod posts about it.[8\|]

tazzygirl -> RE: Town Hall Debate (10/18/2012 6:48:30 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jenniferloves I can't let go, after all that research you done on every tag line, it nearly is annoying for you to see me reply again... Have your point... and you say I can't let go?... tut, after that heroic effort you went to... I must concede to you [;)] Oh P.S. Political sig lines in a Political Thread in my opinion, are part of the conversation... but others may disagree,, you certainly do...[:)] quote: This is a political discussion forum and everything is up for debate, especially when your “sig line” has an anti right message or indeed if it had an anti-left message. Spit your dummy elsewhere, your sig line is political, I called you on it, albeit subtly and you fell for it... Yes, the topic is the Town Hall Debate. Not his sig line. If you wish to discuss the merits, or lack, or the appropriateness of his sig line, then another thread should be started.

TheHeretic -> RE: Town Hall Debate (10/18/2012 6:49:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jenniferloves Political sig lines in a Political Thread in my opinion, are part of the conversation... but others may disagree Sig lines simply are. Please get over it, and move on, lest there be common agreement that Stef's sig line applies best in this circumstance.

Jenniferloves -> RE: Town Hall Debate (10/18/2012 6:57:02 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheHeretic quote: ORIGINAL: Jenniferloves Political sig lines in a Political Thread in my opinion, are part of the conversation... but others may disagree Sig lines simply are. Please get over it, and move on, lest there be common agreement that Stef's sig line applies best in this circumstance. That's what I thought TheHeretic... especially as it relates to the thread.... a question on the 2nd debate... and a sig line potentially bashing one of the opponent.... fair I game I think to make an observation.

mnottertail -> RE: Town Hall Debate (10/18/2012 7:02:09 AM)
quote: If you wish to discuss the merits, or lack, or the appropriateness of his sig line, then another thread should be started. I fear I must revise and extend your remarks Tazzy. While she may copy his sigline and debraid the shit out of it, she cant do any him. I say this as now, I believe the most [awaiting approval] guy on CM, and my next in line FirmHandKY and a distand TheHeretic would agree with that, I do believe. I got most because Domi is gone, Wilbur (as wilbur) and sanity who may have run nearly even with me.

tazzygirl -> RE: Town Hall Debate (10/18/2012 7:08:03 AM)
quote: That's what I thought TheHeretic... especially as it relates to the thread.... a question on the 2nd debate... and a sig line potentially bashing one of the opponent.... fair I game I think to make an observation. Unlike some other posters, Hill tends to be more moderate than most, leaning one way or the other depending on the issue. You assume he is bashing an opponent, which, in fact, he is bashing talk radio hosts.

Jenniferloves -> RE: Town Hall Debate (10/18/2012 7:09:54 AM)
Bashing Right wing Radio

tazzygirl -> RE: Town Hall Debate (10/18/2012 7:12:05 AM)
Yep.... your point? We ALL bash right wing radio. Do a search, Rush is often a target for his stupidity... by those from all three parties.

stellauk -> RE: Town Hall Debate (10/18/2012 7:20:19 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jenniferloves I can concede your point on the loaves on fishes but the truth is, you knew my insinuation with Karl Marx ( hardly a right wing guy ) and my comparison with the current President. But nowhere near as close as Mitt Romney is to Ahmadinejad.

Jenniferloves -> RE: Town Hall Debate (10/18/2012 7:20:36 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Yep.... your point? We ALL bash right wing radio. Do a search, Rush is often a target for his stupidity... by those from all three parties. Look Tazzygirl, I have no issue... It is commendable that you are sticking up for HillWilliam. Indeed, I only made an observation on his Karl Marx Quote and how he used it to describe Right wing radio. The oxymoron was well put together as indeed my little insinuation... He took offence at it.. fine, that doesn’t bother me one bit... but my point is, as you ask, is: if he’s bashing right wing radio and you’re saying he’s objective? Surely objectivity would, to use your own statement earlier, would be to have a go at the left media too? I don’t care for either far right or far left... as you can tell from an earlier post..

Page: << < prev 2 3 [4] 5 6 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875