Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal"


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/28/2012 1:21:36 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

By the way,the analogy sucks,last I looked Iran was not gobbling up her neighbors,and no we are not anywhere near the point of no return.
Hell there are voices in Israel who are pleading for restraint,to let the sanctions do their work,it's only Netenayhu(sp?) and Romney who are beating the histrionic shrill call for immediate action


Have you ever listened to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad? "They gathered, organized and armed the dirties[sic], filthiest and most criminal so-called humans from different parts of the world more than 60 years ago under a false and void excuse and through making fake news and stories. They occupied the Palestinian territories and made the Palestinian nation homeless through their military and propaganda supports" Fars News Agency, Official Iranian Media Translation, unedited, June 16, 2010

So-called humans? Really now.

In a speech to the United Nations on 26 September 2012, which some media said was notable for having "none of the usual dishevelled extremism" or "sabre rattling" that he is known for, Ahmadinejad called for a new world order not dominated by Western powers and condemned the continual threats of military action against Iran by "uncivilized Zionists."

"Many who are disappointed in the struggle between the Islamic world and the infidels have tried to spread the blame. They say it is not possible to have a world without the United States and Zionism. But you know that this is a possible goal and slogan." New York Times, translation, October 30, 2005


Yep, he sure is a great guy!


Perhaps you might want to watch the interview with ahmadinejahd and mike wallace on 60 minutes. In it you will hear ahmadinejad point out the errors in the translations of what he said.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/28/2012 1:33:13 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


I recall from my history classes another group, bent on world domination and destroying the Jews, that the British tried to appease.



Perhaps if you had paid a little closer attention in your history classes you would know that the u.s. did it's share of appeasement.

http://www.mrfaught.org/appeaseusnazi.pdf

Then of course there was the attempted court martial of gen. smedly butler by hoover for "insulting" mousilini.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/28/2012 1:35:16 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

I believe she's referring to the Nazi's, Mike. Google "Chamberlain," for a refresher.


Were you not aware that hoover and roosevelt had the axis cock in their mouths also?

http://www.mrfaught.org/appeaseusnazi.pdf


(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/28/2012 2:13:23 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

By the way,the analogy sucks,last I looked Iran was not gobbling up her neighbors,and no we are not anywhere near the point of no return.
Hell there are voices in Israel who are pleading for restraint,to let the sanctions do their work,it's only Netenayhu(sp?) and Romney who are beating the histrionic shrill call for immediate action


Have you ever listened to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad? "They gathered, organized and armed the dirties[sic], filthiest and most criminal so-called humans from different parts of the world more than 60 years ago under a false and void excuse and through making fake news and stories. They occupied the Palestinian territories and made the Palestinian nation homeless through their military and propaganda supports" Fars News Agency, Official Iranian Media Translation, unedited, June 16, 2010

So-called humans? Really now.

In a speech to the United Nations on 26 September 2012, which some media said was notable for having "none of the usual dishevelled extremism" or "sabre rattling" that he is known for, Ahmadinejad called for a new world order not dominated by Western powers and condemned the continual threats of military action against Iran by "uncivilized Zionists."

"Many who are disappointed in the struggle between the Islamic world and the infidels have tried to spread the blame. They say it is not possible to have a world without the United States and Zionism. But you know that this is a possible goal and slogan." New York Times, translation, October 30, 2005


Yep, he sure is a great guy!


Perhaps you might want to watch the interview with ahmadinejahd and mike wallace on 60 minutes. In it you will hear ahmadinejad point out the errors in the translations of what he said.


Three different speeches. The guy has made others. And your response is that the RIF is misunderstood. Sick.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/28/2012 2:22:44 PM   
YN


Posts: 699
Status: offline
Since the UN Security Council has China and Russia as members, and considering the significant deviations from the UN mandate in Libya, and the current refusal by them to sanction UN military activities in Syria, it is Certain Russia, China or both will veto any request for a military attack on Iran.

Thus if the UN is the arbiter of "international law" then there will not be any "legal" attack on Iran sanctioned by that body. Not that this will stop the US, the UK, Israel, or NATO for some pretext will be manufactured if needed, much as was done in the case of Iraq, and any "international court" will look the other way.


(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/28/2012 2:43:19 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Perhaps you might want to watch the interview with ahmadinejahd and mike wallace on 60 minutes. In it you will hear ahmadinejad point out the errors in the translations of what he said.


Three different speeches. The guy has made others. And your response is that the RIF is misunderstood. Sick.


My response is to the mind numbing ignorance of your post and nothing more.

< Message edited by thompsonx -- 10/28/2012 2:45:14 PM >

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/28/2012 3:00:42 PM   
FMRFGOPGAL


Posts: 763
Joined: 9/1/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
Should international law prevail on this issue?

FMRFGOPGAL :
Yep... Iran should be strung up for threarening the nuclear proliferation treaty.

Bartender. Another scotch and Iranian heavy water please

Tweakabelle:
FYI, Iran is a signatory of the Non Proliferation Treaty and in full standing with all its obligations under that treaty.

They're a signatory, but they are FAR from "in good standing".

But please join the small cacophony of rather deliberate propagandists. It's very clear this is an embraced style.

< Message edited by FMRFGOPGAL -- 10/28/2012 3:19:59 PM >

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/28/2012 3:07:53 PM   
FMRFGOPGAL


Posts: 763
Joined: 9/1/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
Those sites pour cold water on all the scary myths your post suggests you have swallowed hook line and sinker.


All they prove is you found a Iranian State Propaganda Page and a Green Party WingBolt page... Oh, and also that you are desperate to find some way to insult me.
  
Grow up and accept crticism.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/28/2012 4:11:29 PM   
YN


Posts: 699
Status: offline
Here is a better explanation as to the background and as to what is going on in the case of Isreal and Iran - http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-war-on-lebanon-and-the-battle-for-oil/2824

Naturally, since it is written by an award winning and widely published Canadian professor of economics it must be false, too.

But several of his points bear notice for they are unconverted

quote:

The triple alliance is also coupled with a 2005 NATO-Israeli military cooperation agreement under which Israel has become a de facto member of the Atlantic alliance. These military cooperation ties with NATO are viewed by the Israeli military as a means to “enhance Israel’s deterrence capability regarding potential enemies threatening it, mainly Iran and Syria.”


quote:

Diverting Central Asian oil and gas to the Eastern Mediterranean (under Israeli military protection), for re-export back to Asia, serves to undermine the inter-Asian energy market, which is based on the development of direct pipeline corridors linking Central Asia and Russia to South Asia, China and the Far East.

Ultimately, this design is intended to weaken Russia’s role in Central Asia and cut off China from Central Asian oil resources. It is also intended to isolate Iran.

Meanwhile, Israel has emerged as a new powerful player in the global energy market.


So Israel, which has no oil is a major oil player? And Iran, China and Russia stand in the way of this. While the declining Anglo-American oil multinationals are lined up to take their percentages of the oil flow.

And here is the US military map of the national borders rearrangement envisioned to properly implement this plan -

quote:

Note: The following map was prepared by Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters. It was published in the Armed Forces Journal in June 2006, Peters is a retired colonel of the U.S. National War Academy. (Map Copyright Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters 2006).

Although the map does not officially reflect Pentagon doctrine, it has been used in a training program at NATO’s Defense College for senior military officers. This map, as well as other similar maps, has most probably been used at the National War Academy as well as in military planning circles.





Iran is the thumb sticking into this pie.

(in reply to YN)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/28/2012 4:54:12 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

So Israel, which has no oil is a major oil player? And Iran, China and Russia stand in the way of this. While the declining Anglo-American oil multinationals are lined up to take their percentages of the oil flow.

Sorry. Lt.Col Ralph Peters was a crackpot neocon who supported the invasion of Iraq and then denied that a civil war was unfolding when most others were reporting on it. You really can't take Peters seriously.

Iran borders the Caspian oil fields to her north and has the longest coast line of all along the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has developed relations with the land locked Islamic Republics to Her East, and has just completed a deal to build a pipeline across Afghanistan. Additionally, she has a major oil off-loading port on her southern coast on the Arabian Sea next to Pakistan. Iran has hugely advantageous geopolitical positioning and any pipe dream that Israel will provide transport westward for ME oil is an illusion in Peter's head. He writes novels, yanno. Fiction, that is. Don't buy this book; wait for the movie. it will probably be more amusing.

http://www.stratfor.com/analysis/geography-iranian-power-robert-d-kaplan

(in reply to YN)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/28/2012 5:00:48 PM   
FMRFGOPGAL


Posts: 763
Joined: 9/1/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: YN

Here is a better explanation as to the background and as to what is going on in the case of Isreal and Iran - http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-war-on-lebanon-and-the-battle-for-oil/2824

Naturally, since it is written by an award winning and widely published Canadian professor of economics it must be false, too.

But several of his points bear notice for they are unconverted

quote:

The triple alliance is also coupled with a 2005 NATO-Israeli military cooperation agreement under which Israel has become a de facto member of the Atlantic alliance. These military cooperation ties with NATO are viewed by the Israeli military as a means to “enhance Israel’s deterrence capability regarding potential enemies threatening it, mainly Iran and Syria.”


quote:

Diverting Central Asian oil and gas to the Eastern Mediterranean (under Israeli military protection), for re-export back to Asia, serves to undermine the inter-Asian energy market, which is based on the development of direct pipeline corridors linking Central Asia and Russia to South Asia, China and the Far East.

Ultimately, this design is intended to weaken Russia’s role in Central Asia and cut off China from Central Asian oil resources. It is also intended to isolate Iran.

Meanwhile, Israel has emerged as a new powerful player in the global energy market.


So Israel, which has no oil is a major oil player? And Iran, China and Russia stand in the way of this. While the declining Anglo-American oil multinationals are lined up to take their percentages of the oil flow.

And here is the US military map of the national borders rearrangement envisioned to properly implement this plan -

quote:

Note: The following map was prepared by Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters. It was published in the Armed Forces Journal in June 2006, Peters is a retired colonel of the U.S. National War Academy. (Map Copyright Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters 2006).

Although the map does not officially reflect Pentagon doctrine, it has been used in a training program at NATO’s Defense College for senior military officers. This map, as well as other similar maps, has most probably been used at the National War Academy as well as in military planning circles.





Iran is the thumb sticking into this pie.



Hahahahahahahahaha... Utter rubbish. And Vincent is for the first time in my recent memory, right.

(in reply to YN)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/28/2012 5:03:38 PM   
YN


Posts: 699
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

So Israel, which has no oil is a major oil player? And Iran, China and Russia stand in the way of this. While the declining Anglo-American oil multinationals are lined up to take their percentages of the oil flow.

Sorry. Lt.Col Ralph Peters was a crackpot neocon who supported the invasion of Iraq and then denied that a civil war was unfolding when most others were reporting on it. You really can't take Peters seriously.

Iran borders the Caspian oil fields to her north and has the longest coast line of all along the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has developed relations with the land locked Islamic Republics to Her East, and has just completed a deal to build a pipeline across Afghanistan. Additionally, she has a major oil off-loading port on her southern coast on the Arabian Sea next to Pakistan. Iran has hugely advantageous geopolitical positioning and any pipe dream that Israel will provide transport westward for ME oil is an illusion in Peter's head. He writes novels, yanno. Fiction, that is. Don't buy this book; wait for the movie. it will probably be more amusing.

http://www.stratfor.com/analysis/geography-iranian-power-robert-d-kaplan



Yes, many "crackpot neo-cons" in England and the United States supported the invasion of Iraq. As many as support an attack on Iran.

And those Caspian oil fields are where Israel gets most of its oil today, now that robbing Columbia is off the table.

But you are correct in that Iran's eastward activities in terms of trade, oil pipelines, and transportation infrastructure are a direct challenge to the oil hegemony. If nuclear weapons were not an excuse, another would certainly be manufactured.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/28/2012 5:05:49 PM   
YN


Posts: 699
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FMRFGOPGAL


Hahahahahahahahaha... Utter rubbish. And Vincent is for the first time in my recent memory, right.



What part is rubbish?

(in reply to FMRFGOPGAL)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/28/2012 5:10:24 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

But you are correct in that Iran's eastward activities in terms of trade, oil pipelines, and transportation infrastructure are a direct challenge to the oil hegemony. If nuclear weapons were not an excuse, another would certainly be manufactured.

OTOH, don't you think the leverage Iran has in the ME will be off-set by the development of shale oil and gas in Canada and the US plus oil fields in Mexico and Brazil? Additionally, the melting ice in the Artctic will lead to new explorations that will relieve dependency on the ME. I think, but who knows. I suspect that the focus on the ME will eventually be a focus on yesterday's game board.

(in reply to YN)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/28/2012 5:12:05 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

Hahahahahahahahaha... Utter rubbish. And Vincent is for the first time in my recent memory, right.

LMAO!!! I will sleep well tonight, dear lady

(in reply to FMRFGOPGAL)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/28/2012 5:15:24 PM   
YN


Posts: 699
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

But you are correct in that Iran's eastward activities in terms of trade, oil pipelines, and transportation infrastructure are a direct challenge to the oil hegemony. If nuclear weapons were not an excuse, another would certainly be manufactured.

OTOH, don't you think the leverage Iran has in the ME will be off-set by the development of shale oil and gas in Canada and the US plus oil fields in Mexico and Brazil? Additionally, the melting ice in the Artctic will lead to new explorations that will relieve dependency on the ME. I think, but who knows. I suspect that the focus on the ME will eventually be a focus on yesterday's game board.


As far as the Americas are concerned you are correct. However as far as the Europeans (including the Russians) are concerned and the Chinese, this great game will be played, and it is necessary to use the United States military, as no European or Israeli force is powerful enough to prevail.

Thus fictions are needed, so as to get the United States involved.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/28/2012 5:40:40 PM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline
Bless us Brits eh?

Of course, international law doesn't apply to Israel, so it's a pretty moot point.

_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/28/2012 5:51:10 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:


They're a signatory, but they are FAR from "in good standing".


Have you got any credible evidence to back this claim up? Thus far, all we have seen from you is extravagant claims, no evidence or links.

There are numerous IAEA reports on the Iran question. If your claim has any validity, you ought to be able to find some support for your claims in one of those reports. As your claim is that Iran isn't keeping its obligations under the Non Proliferation Treaty, you will be able to identify specifically which of those obligations you believe Iran to be in breach of, with evidence to fully support your claims.

I look forward to seeing what you can produce - if you can produce any credible evidence at all.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 10/28/2012 6:23:23 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to FMRFGOPGAL)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/28/2012 6:22:59 PM   
YN


Posts: 699
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml

Bless us Brits eh?

Of course, international law doesn't apply to Israel, so it's a pretty moot point.


You lay out the grounds of the scenario, Israel who is outside the law, unilaterally attacks Iran, and then invokes its treatys with NATO and the United States when the retaliation inevitably occurs. Naturally the hapless English and United States must support their injured ally.

The commodity price of oil rises greatly worldwide though only the oil flowing from the Persian Gulf is really affected in terms of production costs, but the multi national oil fields in various other places sell their product at the inflated prices. The oil from the Gulf now goes in large part to Asia, thus damaging the East Asia economies. The Anglo-American oil companies take the huge profits while the consumers in Europe and North America pay this hideous tax twice, first for the military intervention needed, and then at the pump.

(in reply to crazyml)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/28/2012 6:26:31 PM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline
Quite.

_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to YN)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078