quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Again... why do you need..........

It's late and I don't want to get into it all right now but the second amendment and paramilitary arms protect us from crooked politicians.

Give me a moment ...

I'm still trying to recover, that was quite a laugh.

I've never owned a gun, but if all it took was the populace having enough AK-47s to prevent the invasions that nobody wanted, and the bank bailouts, then I'm a discount AK-47 dealer- yesterday.

Anyway, I appreciate your saying that Clinton's indiscretion was not worthy of impeachment. I'll say to Aswad; it was ridiculous for Clinton to be dragged in front of the Congress (the US freakin' Congress) to have to answer to such a personal and trivial matter in the first place. No waste of a session of the law-making body of the US for that silly crap, then no lies.

Anyway, lovmuffin; I think Nixon deserved to be impeached (by the House), but not convicted by the Senate, which would have happened, which is why he resigned before impeachment. The Republican hierarchy never liked Nixon, which is why they let him hang. He just did not have a good personality and people did not like being around him, and he had his own way, which the hierarchy didn't like at all. But the rank-and-file Republican voters of the day wanted Nixon, not whoever else the Republicans had in mind. That always pissed them off.

I don't envy anybody who had to deal with Kissinger.

In other words Edwynn the intent behind the 2nd amendment when it was written was for citizens to have the means to overthrow a tyrannical government. I simply was stating that in other words.

Are you still operating under the impression that this is possible ?

quote:

ORIGINAL: searching4mysir

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I dont believe anyone needs to own an automatic weapon. Bambi isnt that hard to bring down.

I dont believe anyone needs to own a semi-automatic weapon... same reason.

I dont believe anyone should ever be allowed to sell a gun from their trunk/home/garage/business without having to do a background check.

I believe the gun show loop holes should be closed.

I dont buy into the excuse that because someone will find a way around the system, the system doesnt need fixing.

The 2nd amendment isn't about hunting.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

So far the restrictive legislation on gun rights that is law of this land is republican in nature, so nothing else in the hysterical rant would follow, fella.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: searching4mysir

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I dont believe anyone needs to own an automatic weapon. Bambi isnt that hard to bring down.

I dont believe anyone needs to own a semi-automatic weapon... same reason.

I dont believe anyone should ever be allowed to sell a gun from their trunk/home/garage/business without having to do a background check.

I believe the gun show loop holes should be closed.

I dont buy into the excuse that because someone will find a way around the system, the system doesnt need fixing.

The 2nd amendment isn't about hunting.

Its no longer about a well armed militia either.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I dont believe anyone needs to own an automatic weapon. Bambi isnt that hard to bring down.

The 2nd amendment isn't about hunting and automatic weapons a severely restricted.


I dont believe anyone needs to own a semi-automatic weapon... same reason.


The 2nd amendment isn't about hunting. Semi autos have been around for over 100 years. They'll be around for 100 more.

I dont believe anyone should ever be allowed to sell a gun from their trunk/home/garage/business without having to do a background check.


Good luck with that one.

I believe the gun show loop holes should be closed.

I dont buy into the excuse that because someone will find a way around the system, the system doesnt need fixing.


If people are finding a way around the system then it's not really fixed.

quote:

If people are finding a way around the system then it's not really fixed.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

So far the restrictive legislation on gun rights that is law of this land is republican in nature, so nothing else in the hysterical rant would follow, fella.

How so ?

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

So far the restrictive legislation on gun rights that is law of this land is republican in nature, so nothing else in the hysterical rant would follow, fella.

How so ?

sort of shuffle around and see like.........Reagan, Brady and who was pushing the shit outta it.  Who authored it and so on.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

Absolutely it's possible. I doubt the government is going to send fighter jets in to mow down neighborhoods or bomb us out with tanks. As long as we retain the right to bear arms then it's not likely we will ever need it for it's intended purpose. One would also has to assume military and police personnel would be willing to mow down citizens.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

So far the restrictive legislation on gun rights that is law of this land is republican in nature, so nothing else in the hysterical rant would follow, fella.

How so ?

sort of shuffle around and see like.........Reagan, Brady and who was pushing the shit outta it.  Who authored it and so on.

Sorta spell it out why don'tcha

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

In other words Edwynn the intent behind the 2nd amendment when it was written was for citizens to have the means to overthrow a tyrannical government.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I dont believe anyone needs to own an automatic weapon. Bambi isnt that hard to bring down.

I dont believe anyone needs to own a semi-automatic weapon... same reason.

I dont believe anyone should ever be allowed to sell a gun from their trunk/home/garage/business without having to do a background check.

I believe the gun show loop holes should be closed.

I dont buy into the excuse that because someone will find a way around the system, the system doesnt need fixing.

quote:

ORIGINAL: searching4mysir

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I dont believe anyone needs to own an automatic weapon. Bambi isnt that hard to bring down.

I dont believe anyone needs to own a semi-automatic weapon... same reason.

I dont believe anyone should ever be allowed to sell a gun from their trunk/home/garage/business without having to do a background check.

I believe the gun show loop holes should be closed.

I dont buy into the excuse that because someone will find a way around the system, the system doesnt need fixing.

The 2nd amendment isn't about hunting.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

At the time it was written, you do realize that the government did not provide guns for the defense of this country? That each man had to provide his own gun if he was called into service?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

In other words Edwynn the intent behind the 2nd amendment when it was written was for citizens to have the means to overthrow a tyrannical government.

At the moment, Zomney is the only candidate to overthrow a tyrannical government, mostly by bankrupting it.

I fail to see where "assault weapons" enter the picture.

IWYW,
— Aswad.

quote:

ORIGINAL: searching4mysir

quote:


Its no longer about a well armed militia either.

quote:


Of course it is. It is about citizens being able to overthrow their government if necessary. That is a form of self-defense.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

I don't understand the meaning of your post. If Zomney has bankrupted the government then I can see why assault weapons wouldn't enter into it but how are you coming up with the first line ?