Edwynn
Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008 Status: offline
|
While on the subject of abject academic dementia, whence the "critical' thinking" infestation? Would you consider that 'critical thinking' in any relevant sector of society has improved in that regard as result of this insidiously inane requirement, such as was completely lacking theretofore? Do you think that what society needs as for progression is a focus of young people at an ever earlier age to polish their ability to state opinions, in detriment to time spent on learning how to do useful and productive things? The "critical thinking" sham is actually just a side show in the (apparently quite successful) corporate influence into academia, which, not unlike sports, instills in the student a purpose of crusade, as long as 'critically' thought out. Even worse than sports, in my estimation. Nothing more than mind-numbing stultification of natural thought process, instead now requiring that such process be constrained to some predetermined track. If these people who purport to wish a good education for our society would apprise themselves of the advice of those who know what they're talking about have been advocating for decades, based on r/l experience rather than academic-conjecture-as-forced-march, they could start with getting a grasp on brain development, which learning to play a musical instrument AND (not 'or') learning a foreign language, at the earliest age, accomplishes. All the 'critical thinking' crap does is accommodate the prior corporate badgering of kids' minds subjected to thousands of hours of their mental, emotional, and psychological inculcation to that point. Don't ask them to 'critically think' it, please. Teach them how to reject it.
< Message edited by Edwynn -- 11/10/2012 2:05:53 AM >
|