fucktoyprincess -> RE: The White Female Vote in America (11/14/2012 4:23:26 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: JeffBC quote:
ORIGINAL: TreasureKY You appear to be assuming that those things that are of interest to you, are of enough interest to other woman that they override any other factors that might be used to make a decision. This. In my opinion ANY candidate who is "not me" is going to represent some mix of stuff I agree with and disagree with. This year I voted green because Jill Stein was the only candidate taking an occupy stance. I instructed Carol to vote democratic because as much as I believe the occupy issues are critical, for her being a female I felt that issues of personal sovereignty over her own body were even more critical. So there's a perfect example of picking thing A I disliked in order to get thing B I did like. I see no reason why someone like Treasure might make a similar stance. Sure there's some crazy anti-female rhetoric going on in the Republican party right now. But it's perfectly reasonable to say something like, "I'm choosing to place the nation's benefit over my own." Let us deal with fiscal responsibility first and then we'll worry about personal sovereignty. It's just a different set of priorities than mine. Again, please read the OP. I say, perhaps they voted this way due to some combination of the following (and then I go on to list many possibilities). I state, clearly, some combination. I also ask for others' opinions (because my list was also not exhaustive). My OP is also NOT limited to issues about personal sovereignty. Please, go back, and read it. In other words, I also agree with what you say. I was trying to isolate the specific reasons that were prioritized. And while I do agree that people can have different priorities personally, this does not mean, as a political matter, that any of the rest of us have to treat that set of priorities as being ideal. In other words, I can criticize someone else for the priorities they have. In addition, having certain sets of priorities also says something deeper about how much people value certain other things. And that means they are open to criticism or praise depending on other people's perspectives. We are all still free to evaluate someone else's priorities as misguided, wrong, not good for other people, selfish, against self-interest, etc. If someone routinely chooses to work over spending time with their family, does this mean because they chose this, and they are free to choose this, that others are not allowed to tell them their priorities are wrong? Some of you are confusing political freedom with freedom from criticism.
|
|
|
|