DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: kdsub I don't know DomKen...check my post to thompson... Pretty rich for my blood... Maybe I just picked the wrong contractor. I'll bet a lot of the cost is retrofitting existing homes. I'm surprised there are not more new homes built with solar and wind and earth assist heating. I know there are incentives with tax deduction but not enough to really help. Maybe big corps can afford the luxury of solar power but the vast majority of homeowners can’t. At least me anyway…how about you? Maybe we can get thompsons’ unit if he would give us some specs to see if it would power our homes. I'm not stubborn and i truly want to be wrong...just show me the money. Butch Save up and start small. From what I've read, the initial installation costs have to do with the electrical system, and not so much with the physical structural system. That might be something you can do yourself and have an electrician come in for the electrical hook up. It's entirely possible that you would be able to add to the system yourself after the initial install. If you really want to go solar, and don't have $27k to drop, don't drop $27k. Every $$ you drop into a system is another $$ closer you get to solar being your main supply. As you continue to earn your pay and your utility bills start showing a savings, more panels can be installed. There is nothing requiring you to set up a massive system right off the bat. If you were talking geothermal, then, yeah, that's not really something you can easily add to over the years. But, solar can be a patchwork job, adding as you go. Just make sure that you size the electrical system for the initial install to take into account the upgrades/additions. If your roof isn't brand new, you might want to start there, and work in any structural upgrades that might be necessary to handle the weight of a system added to your current structure. I don't know how old you are, but a new roof should last 20-40 years, and perhaps even longer when you consider that it'll be shielded, eventually, by solar panels. It may not be a concern of yours once it's done. Something else to look at: generation reimbursement from the utility. If you produce more than you use at any given time, you either need a battery bank to store it for use at lower production/higher use times, or you send it back to the grid, pulling from the grid when your demands are lower than your generation. I don't know if anything has changed, but years ago, power companies would only reimburse for generation costs, and not pay you for the distribution. So, your effective reimbursement may not be the effective rate you are paying. For instance, at the house I'm renovating (not living there... yet), my October cycle charge was $28.89 for 216 KWH. That breaks down to $0.13375/KWH. My power generation charge was only $11.80 ($0.54630/KWH). The rest, $17.09 ($0.07912/KWH) is distribution-related. If I were to have used 216 KWH from the grid over the course of the month, but over-generated 216 KWH during sunlight hours, sending the rest back to the grid, I'd only be reimbursed $11.80.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|