RE: Stand you rground ..again in FL (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


tazzygirl -> RE: Stand you rground ..again in FL (11/28/2012 1:42:21 PM)

http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/29/us/stand-your-ground/index.html

This is one who was killed in a Taco Bell parking lot by a man in a vehicle. Just saying we dont know all the details yet.




jlf1961 -> RE: Stand you rground ..again in FL (11/28/2012 1:55:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: stellauk

And gun ownership isn't an issue here?

How many people does someone have to shoot for it to become an issue?


There are countries with strict gun laws, and criminals still have guns, and gun related crimes still happen.

I find it funny that people in other countries want to tell the United States what to do.

There is truth in the saying, if you outlaw guns only outlaws will have guns.

AND NOT EVERYONE THAT OWNS GUNS KILL PEOPLE. Most gun crime in the United States is committed with ILLEGALLY obtained guns.




JeffBC -> RE: Stand you rground ..again in FL (11/28/2012 2:00:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: muhly22222
As for why nobody's covering it, there's not really a major reason to. Yes, it is white-on-black crime, but the police are investigating, which was where the Trayvon Martin controversy got started: the police didn't investigate. It's the kind of crime that might make the local news all over the country, but isn't likely to go past that.

Well, I personally would like to track it if only because of the Trayvon Martin thing. But otherwise I agree. What made the news last time was the lack of appropriate law enforcement response. I had no opinion on whether the guy was guilty of murder or not but I sure as hell thought that when someone dies at the hands of another it's probably worth looking into.




Nelee -> RE: Stand you rground ..again in FL (11/28/2012 2:19:33 PM)

Not really anything new.
We die everyday. Our color alone is enough for someone to feel that their life is "threatened". It's the same reason that white women clutch their purses closer to them when I walk by, or why a group of teenagers would rather walk across the street, eyeing us warily than pass a friend and I on the sidewalk. It's the reason police brutality against POC is so commonplace and why we get killed for no reason or due to "accidents" during a "mistaken raid" everyday. Hell, some are killed by the same police officers we called for help.
Honestly, most of us are so accustomed to this type of thing that we don't even make a big deal about.

And race is mentioned because race matters. Being "color blind" is nothing but racist ideology dressed in apathetic clothing. But I suppose it's easier to turn a blind eye when you aren't a part of the group being systematically discriminated against.




JeffBC -> RE: Stand you rground ..again in FL (11/28/2012 2:43:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nelee
And race is mentioned because race matters. Being "color blind" is nothing but racist ideology dressed in apathetic clothing. But I suppose it's easier to turn a blind eye when you aren't a part of the group being systematically discriminated against.

You know you've mentioned this before but you were more even-handed in your previous post. You, of course, will do as you will. But personally I think it ill-suits ANY cause to denigrate those people who are already on-board. Driving away actual supporters is seldom wise. You can damned well bet that if I start to feel like I'm the enemy in black's eyes then I will treat them as the enemy also -- much like has happened with myself and feminism. Personally, I'd prefer to not be the enemy and not draw those particular battle lines.




MstSebastian -> RE: Stand you rground ..again in FL (11/28/2012 2:48:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nelee
And race is mentioned because race matters. Being "color blind" is nothing but racist ideology dressed in apathetic clothing. But I suppose it's easier to turn a blind eye when you aren't a part of the group being systematically discriminated against.

So, because I don't think someone's race matters in how I treat them, because I don't look at the race of people in a story and assume that it was motivation, I am a racist myself?

Is that your claim?




JeffBC -> RE: Stand you rground ..again in FL (11/28/2012 3:03:19 PM)

Not exactly MstSebastian. She clarified on a previous post. In my opinion she has an unfortunate tendency to conflate "color blind" at the interpersonal level with "blind to the issues of minorities in the culture". I cannot, myself, understand the wisdom of taking what should have been a positive label and perverting it in that way but it isn't my viewpoint. She kind of reminds me of the militant feminists. In her case.. "All white people are bad, even those who are on-side."




MstSebastian -> RE: Stand you rground ..again in FL (11/28/2012 3:10:36 PM)

Ah, okay. That makes sense...and, for the record, I'm with you on this one.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Stand you rground ..again in FL (11/28/2012 3:32:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
quote:

ORIGINAL: Level
Fr
As much as I'd like to shoot those that have the loud ass stereos......

I'd rather drive by them and simultaneously hit a really DEEP puddle because the little shits always have their windows down.
I've managed to do it twice.[8D]


Any asshat driving long the road should do....





stellauk -> RE: Stand you rground ..again in FL (11/28/2012 7:53:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

In case you hadn't noticed we're rather cavalier about human life in our culture Stella. So no, we're not all that concerned about the death toll. As I understand it the right to keep and bear arms was in the constitution to protect ourselves from our own government. Given our history that's not really all that surprising. Up to a few years ago I had thought that was an antiquated concept that could be safely retired. No longer.



quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

There are countries with strict gun laws, and criminals still have guns, and gun related crimes still happen.

I find it funny that people in other countries want to tell the United States what to do.

There is truth in the saying, if you outlaw guns only outlaws will have guns.

AND NOT EVERYONE THAT OWNS GUNS KILL PEOPLE. Most gun crime in the United States is committed with ILLEGALLY obtained guns.



I'm well aware of the differences in culture..

I also don't have an issue with the 2nd Amendment. I can take my trash out and not encounter various forms of wildlife such as raccoons, coyotes, etc. I just get the occasional odd look from a fox.

What I'm struggling with is how anyone could even entertain a self-defence claim given the circumstances of the case.




tazzygirl -> RE: Stand you rground ..again in FL (11/28/2012 7:57:31 PM)

I think many of us are struggling with that, stella.




jlf1961 -> RE: Stand you rground ..again in FL (11/28/2012 8:24:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: stellauk


quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

In case you hadn't noticed we're rather cavalier about human life in our culture Stella. So no, we're not all that concerned about the death toll. As I understand it the right to keep and bear arms was in the constitution to protect ourselves from our own government. Given our history that's not really all that surprising. Up to a few years ago I had thought that was an antiquated concept that could be safely retired. No longer.



quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

There are countries with strict gun laws, and criminals still have guns, and gun related crimes still happen.

I find it funny that people in other countries want to tell the United States what to do.

There is truth in the saying, if you outlaw guns only outlaws will have guns.

AND NOT EVERYONE THAT OWNS GUNS KILL PEOPLE. Most gun crime in the United States is committed with ILLEGALLY obtained guns.



I'm well aware of the differences in culture..

I also don't have an issue with the 2nd Amendment. I can take my trash out and not encounter various forms of wildlife such as raccoons, coyotes, etc. I just get the occasional odd look from a fox.

What I'm struggling with is how anyone could even entertain a self-defence claim given the circumstances of the case.



Your original statement implied that gun OWNERSHIP was the problem.

As far as self defense in this case, I doubt it. Unless the person killed had a gun as well and was threatening to use it.

As for myself, I own guns and have a concealed carry permit that I have kept up from when I was a manager at a high volume business. I have never had reason to draw my weapon, and most days I do not carry it. Only on long trips out of town.




Nelee -> RE: Stand you rground ..again in FL (11/28/2012 11:31:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

You know you've mentioned this before but you were more even-handed in your previous post. You, of course, will do as you will. But personally I think it ill-suits ANY cause to denigrate those people who are already on-board. Driving away actual supporters is seldom wise. You can damned well bet that if I start to feel like I'm the enemy in black's eyes then I will treat them as the enemy also -- much like has happened with myself and feminism. Personally, I'd prefer to not be the enemy and not draw those particular battle lines.


Have you ever heard the phrase, "If you don't speak out against it, you're a part of the problem?" That's basically what I'm saying.

If an inability to recognize the reality of a situation and take into consideration the faults of a society makes a few turn of their noses, they can do as they will. They aren't people that I would particularly call "allies", in that case. Color blindness usually implies that race is a "social construct", and uses that to say that the people who talk about race/ism are the ones who keep it alive (ie. "omg Why does everything have to be about race?!") Because, my race is my identity. It is literally what makes me, me. People who push to ignore the race differences in crimes like this are the main reasons that it continues to happen. If you really think in a "color blind" way, you WON'T recognize the racism that occurs to others daily (or that you could even be inflicting on other, because you simply don't recognize your trespass).

I'm not driving away "supporters" by pointing this out. I'm making you come to terms with how the real world is, at the sake of the "security" of your ignorance. But by the fourth sentence, I can kind of tell the person I'm dealing with, so I don't feel the need to waste anymore of my time trying to explain. You would just complain about how I'm some type of radical and how I'm threatening your position in life or something.


quote:

ORIGINAL: MstSebastian

So, because I don't think someone's race matters in how I treat them, because I don't look at the race of people in a story and assume that it was motivation, I am a racist myself?

Is that your claim?


No. My claim is, "If you don't speak out against it, you're a part of the problem." I'm saying that you're being an enabler, which in term is harming the people that you claim you are not hostile to. You say you aren't racist, but allow ideologies which would not criminalize racism to thrive. The actions and the words do not match up.


quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC
[...]she has an unfortunate tendency to conflate "color blind" at the interpersonal level with "blind to the issues of minorities in the culture".


Not quite. Read what I wrote above. And it's not an "unfortunate tendency", but if you wish to misuse words to try and manipulate your point, then continue as you were.

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

I cannot, myself, understand the wisdom of taking what should have been a positive label and perverting it in that way but it isn't my viewpoint. She kind of reminds me of the militant feminists. In her case.. "All white people are bad, even those who are on-side."


...But it's not a positive label, and that is what you don't seem to want to understand. Also, you're quite the hypocrite. I am perverting your "positive label", while you falsely summarizing my message as, "All white people are bad, even those who are on-side," is not?

Again, you show that you're unable to interpret my meaning. You're taking what I'm saying as personal attack on your position, rather than what it really is. Black people not trying to play King of the Mountain with you. Realizing that our problems are not the same as your own won't endanger your territory.




Kirata -> RE: Stand you rground ..again in FL (11/28/2012 11:39:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nelee

Because, my race is my identity. It is literally what makes me, me.

That's a pretty sad state of affairs. I can't imagine why you would think like that, or why the advice of someone who does should be treated as anything more than a curiosity.

K.




JeffBC -> RE: Stand you rground ..again in FL (11/28/2012 11:42:16 PM)

Yup, you win. Im not quite sure what you've won but there ya go anyway.




MstSebastian -> RE: Stand you rground ..again in FL (11/28/2012 11:50:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: stellauk

What I'm struggling with is how anyone could even entertain a self-defence claim given the circumstances of the case.

You mean the circumstances that you are hearing about third-hand through a very short newspaper article? Those circumstances?




MstSebastian -> RE: Stand you rground ..again in FL (11/28/2012 11:53:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nelee

No. My claim is, "If you don't speak out against it, you're a part of the problem." I'm saying that you're being an enabler, which in term is harming the people that you claim you are not hostile to. You say you aren't racist, but allow ideologies which would not criminalize racism to thrive. The actions and the words do not match up.


Oh, my. Sociology 101 rears its ugly head again. You seem to have determined quite a bit about me from just a quick read of a few short posts I've made on an internet forum. How astute of you.

So, tell me, what ideologies have I "allowed?"




Nelee -> RE: Stand you rground ..again in FL (11/29/2012 12:12:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nelee

Because, my race is my identity. It is literally what makes me, me.

That's a pretty sad state of affairs. I can't imagine why you would think like that, or why the advice of someone who does should be treated as anything more than a curiosity.

K.



When you're the default (ie. white), it's quite difficult to see yourself the same, I'm sure. But I'd imagine that if you were born in a different nation, in a different skin, where you actually have an identity and a culture. Where you actually have something that you can lose. You would be a very different person.
So, I guess I could say it's a sad state of affairs that you were born an a white male in America. Because you would be exactly the same as an Hispanic male in Chile, right?

If you stopped for a second to think outside of yourself, you might learn something.





quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

Yup, you win. Im not quite sure what you've won but there ya go anyway.


Well, when you make an ass of yourself, I suppose you have to go out with some "grace" to save face.






quote:

ORIGINAL: MstSebastian


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nelee

No. My claim is, "If you don't speak out against it, you're a part of the problem." I'm saying that you're being an enabler, which in term is harming the people that you claim you are not hostile to. You say you aren't racist, but allow ideologies which would not criminalize racism to thrive. The actions and the words do not match up.


Oh, my. Sociology 101 rears its ugly head again. You seem to have determined quite a bit about me from just a quick read of a few short posts I've made on an internet forum. How astute of you.

So, tell me, what ideologies have I "allowed?"


...You do realize that the word "you" can be used as a singular and plural indicator, right? I think I'm going to need you to go back to English 101 and learn to read deary, haha. Now, with that newfound knowledge, let's see if you can now decipher my response! I'll give you a hint: Read "you" as a general, plural subject, and you may understand it.

I don't know anything about you (other than your apparent ignorance shown in this thread). Why would I be personally referring to yourself? Hehe, silly.




Kirata -> RE: Stand you rground ..again in FL (11/29/2012 1:18:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nelee

When you're the default (ie. white), it's quite difficult to see yourself the same, I'm sure. But I'd imagine that if you were born in a different nation, in a different skin, where you actually have an identity and a culture...

I am surprised to learn that as a white I don't have an identity or a culture. What an educational place this is! I hope you'll tell us more about white people.

K.




Nelee -> RE: Stand you rground ..again in FL (11/29/2012 1:27:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nelee

When you're the default (ie. white), it's quite difficult to see yourself the same, I'm sure. But I'd imagine that if you were born in a different nation, in a different skin, where you actually have an identity and a culture...

I am surprised to learn that as a white I don't have an identity or a culture. What an educational place this is! I hope you'll tell us more about white people.

K.



Quoting things out of context sure does rally that inner rage, doesn't it? Try harder.

How about actually trying to argue? Or you can just appeal to pathos and hope you build up enough offense in another on looker that you find an ally to join your cause. Maybe that person will be better suited for doing what you cannot.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875