RE: Armed "volunteers" in our schools (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


tazzygirl -> RE: Armed "volunteers" in our schools (12/17/2012 4:39:50 PM)

quote:

The bigger problem goes way beyond this one shooting. Shootings that are no less troubling are a regular occurance in some areas of our country, committed by people who should never have gotten their hands on a gun, but did, thanks to a thriving black market in firepower. The obvious solution to the wider problem of guns in the wrong hands, and its consequences, is to make illegal possession and/or sale a major law enforcement target. That would requires resources, however, and our government seems to feel that it is more important to stop people from getting high than to stop them from killing each other.


This has nothing to do with a black market

This has nothing to do with gang bangers

This has to do with a mentally ill person getting his hands on guns legally obtained and owned by someone he knows, and allows him access too.




Moonhead -> RE: Armed "volunteers" in our schools (12/17/2012 4:40:22 PM)

If we are getting the NRA excuses about why people need assault rifles, perhaps somebody could answer me this one: whatever for?
My understanding was that if you're hunting you need a shotgun or a bolt action rifle, and if you want a gun to keep in the house or the car (or on your person in a concealed carry state) for self defence, then a pistol is going to be good enough.
Why exactly do you need a submachine gun (let alone an assault rifle) unless you're planning a bank job or a spree killing?




SimplyMichael -> RE: Armed "volunteers" in our schools (12/17/2012 4:49:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

If we are getting the NRA excuses about why people need assault rifles, perhaps somebody could answer me this one: whatever for?
My understanding was that if you're hunting you need a shotgun or a bolt action rifle, and if you want a gun to keep in the house or the car (or on your person in a concealed carry state) for self defence, then a pistol is going to be good enough.
Why exactly do you need a submachine gun (let alone an assault rifle) unless you're planning a bank job or a spree killing?


The 2nd amendment is about civilians owning superior weapons than the government as a guatantee of our freedom.

If someone is shooting at me, i hope the have a submachinegun or an assualt weapon, less deadly and accurate than a hunting rifle.




Raptorsc -> RE: Armed "volunteers" in our schools (12/17/2012 4:51:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

If we are getting the NRA excuses about why people need assault rifles, perhaps somebody could answer me this one: whatever for?
My understanding was that if you're hunting you need a shotgun or a bolt action rifle, and if you want a gun to keep in the house or the car (or on your person in a concealed carry state) for self defence, then a pistol is going to be good enough.
Why exactly do you need a submachine gun (let alone an assault rifle) unless you're planning a bank job or a spree killing?


Well thats why the argument over the definition of an assault weapon flared up, an ar15 is used as a hunting, sporting, target shooting platform. as far as i am aware none of the recent shooting used an "automatic weapon" all weapons used are legaly obtainable for use in home defense and / or hunting.

the last "maching gun" shootout i am aware of, was the two robbers vs all those cops in california all those years back. california has crazy strict gun laws and they had guys out there stealing tanks... so that just shows you how obediant crazys are to "laws"




Moonhead -> RE: Armed "volunteers" in our schools (12/17/2012 4:51:01 PM)

Not actually the question I asked, or anything to do with it.




DomKen -> RE: Armed "volunteers" in our schools (12/17/2012 4:53:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

I admit that I am mystified by the assault rifle discussion.

Weren't those children and teachers shot with some kind of pistols?

No. they were shot with a Bushmaster AR-15




slvemike4u -> RE: Armed "volunteers" in our schools (12/17/2012 4:55:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: deathtothepixies


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Liar
quote:

The AR-15 was eventually adopted by the United States military under the designation M16


What's not clear to you here? The AR-15 was and is a civilian weapon that the military adapted by adding automatic fire capability. Your claim to the contrary and your claim that "AR-15" is just a civilian designation for the M16 assault rifle are both pure bullshit.

K.



what the fuck is wrong with you people??

All those dead children and the best you can do is argue over what or what isn't a true assault rifle?

I think unwittingly you have uncovered the true nature of Americas problem.

It doesn't matter you morons, the only thing that matters is stopping another atrocity from happening

Amen,afuckingmen.
But this is the deflection bullshit we are required to put up with here.
We must argue semantics with idiots before we can get to the root of the gun problem.....namely too many guns in too many dangerous hands.




Just0Plain0Mike -> RE: Armed "volunteers" in our schools (12/17/2012 4:56:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

I admit that I am mystified by the assault rifle discussion.

Weren't those children and teachers shot with some kind of pistols?

No. they were shot with a Bushmaster AR-15


Is that now official? Last I heard he had stolen an AR from his mother, but it wasn't found in the school. That the weapons he entered the school with were pistols. A SIG and a Glock.




deathtothepixies -> RE: Armed "volunteers" in our schools (12/17/2012 4:57:23 PM)

the best you could hope for when the 2nd was written was a musket, a fucking musket.
Weapons have evolved a little from there yet the 2nd still stands as this immovable object that has to be protected at all costs otherwise one of your "freedoms" is removed.

Every law is about removing a freedom, why is the 2nd so damn special?




SimplyMichael -> RE: Armed "volunteers" in our schools (12/17/2012 4:58:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Not actually the question I asked, or anything to do with it.


I did...but the other two reasons is history and omfg they are fun to shoot.

As a left wing commie who has shaken Mikhail Kalishnikov's hand, held prototypes of Armalights and can ahow you where stoner stole ever bad design for the POS ar...i really do like the history they represebt.




DomKen -> RE: Armed "volunteers" in our schools (12/17/2012 5:00:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Just0Plain0Mike


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

I admit that I am mystified by the assault rifle discussion.

Weren't those children and teachers shot with some kind of pistols?

No. they were shot with a Bushmaster AR-15


Is that now official? Last I heard he had stolen an AR from his mother, but it wasn't found in the school. That the weapons he entered the school with were pistols. A SIG and a Glock.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/17/us/lanza-used-a-popular-ar-15-style-rifle-in-newtown.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&




SimplyMichael -> RE: Armed "volunteers" in our schools (12/17/2012 5:01:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: deathtothepixies

the best you could hope for when the 2nd was written was a musket, a fucking musket.
Weapons have evolved a little from there yet the 2nd still stands as this immovable object that has to be protected at all costs otherwise one of your "freedoms" is removed.

Every law is about removing a freedom, why is the 2nd so damn special?


No, that was the best the government had, many civilians had rifles, as in rifled bores, shhot father and with greater accuracy.

Now, do you want to use your same logic for the rest of the bill of rights? No protection for phones, internet, email, or privacy from electronic eavesdropping, etc?




Just0Plain0Mike -> RE: Armed "volunteers" in our schools (12/17/2012 5:03:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/17/us/lanza-used-a-popular-ar-15-style-rifle-in-newtown.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&


Thank you, I hadn't seen that.




Moonhead -> RE: Armed "volunteers" in our schools (12/17/2012 5:03:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Not actually the question I asked, or anything to do with it.


I did...but the other two reasons is history and omfg they are fun to shoot.

As a left wing commie who has shaken Mikhail Kalishnikov's hand, held prototypes of Armalights and can ahow you where stoner stole ever bad design for the POS ar...i really do like the history they represebt.

You didn't.
I asked why anybody needed an SMG or assault rifle unless they plan to indiscriminately kill a lot of people. Some blather about the second amendment has little or no bearing on that. The fun thing sounds a lot more germane, frankly.




Raptorsc -> RE: Armed "volunteers" in our schools (12/17/2012 5:06:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Not actually the question I asked, or anything to do with it.


you asked why do you need an assault rife, Im informing you "assault rifles" such as the ar15 are used as hunting, sporting, and target shooting guns. I answered your questing i thought, maybe im not understanding it




DomKen -> RE: Armed "volunteers" in our schools (12/17/2012 5:11:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raptorsc


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Not actually the question I asked, or anything to do with it.


you asked why do you need an assault rife, Im informing you "assault rifles" such as the ar15 are used as hunting, sporting, and target shooting guns. I answered your questing i thought, maybe im not understanding it

AR-15's are terrible hunting and target shooting weapons. They were designed to be less accurate than hunting rifles and earlier military rifles, shorter barrels amongst other features.

People buy AR's becuase they are either completely clueless or have rambo fantasies.

If you intend to hunt and do it well you get a decent 30 caliber rifle (.30-30 or 30-06 or .308) or a .22 RIM for small game. Both also work much better for target shooting than an AR.




slvemike4u -> RE: Armed "volunteers" in our schools (12/17/2012 5:13:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Raptorsc


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

If we are getting the NRA excuses about why people need assault rifles, perhaps somebody could answer me this one: whatever for?
My understanding was that if you're hunting you need a shotgun or a bolt action rifle, and if you want a gun to keep in the house or the car (or on your person in a concealed carry state) for self defence, then a pistol is going to be good enough.
Why exactly do you need a submachine gun (let alone an assault rifle) unless you're planning a bank job or a spree killing?


Well thats why the argument over the definition of an assault weapon flared up, an ar15 is used as a hunting, sporting, target shooting platform. as far as i am aware none of the recent shooting used an "automatic weapon" all weapons used are legaly obtainable for use in home defense and / or hunting.

the last "maching gun" shootout i am aware of, was the two robbers vs all those cops in california all those years back. california has crazy strict gun laws and they had guys out there stealing tanks... so that just shows you how obediant crazys are to "laws"

And that does not trouble you ?




slvemike4u -> RE: Armed "volunteers" in our schools (12/17/2012 5:15:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael


quote:

ORIGINAL: deathtothepixies

the best you could hope for when the 2nd was written was a musket, a fucking musket.
Weapons have evolved a little from there yet the 2nd still stands as this immovable object that has to be protected at all costs otherwise one of your "freedoms" is removed.

Every law is about removing a freedom, why is the 2nd so damn special?


No, that was the best the government had, many civilians had rifles, as in rifled bores, shhot father and with greater accuracy.

Now, do you want to use your same logic for the rest of the bill of rights? No protection for phones, internet, email, or privacy from electronic eavesdropping, etc?

Ask me that after some loon uses a cell phone,the internet or email to kill 20 children [8|]




SimplyMichael -> RE: Armed "volunteers" in our schools (12/17/2012 5:17:58 PM)

An early assualt rifle could have done this just as easy as a modern one. Cowboys had access to dangerously lethal mass killing machines like the Winchester 1892 with 15 round capacity...

You cant design a gun law to get rid of "bad" guns. Hell i am.more afraid of a boy scout who can ahhot his.little .22 well than a gang banger with an ak47.

That is the point.





Raptorsc -> RE: Armed "volunteers" in our schools (12/17/2012 5:18:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raptorsc


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Not actually the question I asked, or anything to do with it.


you asked why do you need an assault rife, Im informing you "assault rifles" such as the ar15 are used as hunting, sporting, and target shooting guns. I answered your questing i thought, maybe im not understanding it

AR-15's are terrible hunting and target shooting weapons. They were designed to be less accurate than hunting rifles and earlier military rifles, shorter barrels amongst other features.

People buy AR's becuase they are either completely clueless or have rambo fantasies.

If you intend to hunt and do it well you get a decent 30 caliber rifle (.30-30 or 30-06 or .308) or a .22 RIM for small game. Both also work much better for target shooting than an AR.


Terrible hunting rifles? Its about all anyone uses these days. most states wont let you use 30-06 or .308 because the rounds travel a hell of alot further and with more kenetic energy. I live in indiana and ar15s are mainly varment platforms, I dont know where you get that "they arent accurate" ca-ca from but most are good well out beyond 800 - 900 yards.

If you want to argue something bad about the 5.56 round argue that it was designed to tumble in the body and wound, not kill, because the prevalent thinking at the time of its inception was a wounded soldier took two soldiers to carry him off the battlefield thus taking three soldiers off the battlefield.




Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.09375