Powergamz1
Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011 Status: offline
|
Freedom from such fears, or freedom from being offended, or freedom from having to be tolerant of differences, are mores. When a society progresses beyond the point of legislating those negative 'rights' (always in favor of the upper classes), it is considered a good thing in some quarters. With such progress comes negative consequences. It is a 3 dimensional world. The question is how to balance, not how to return to the comfort of pre-Wellingon days. quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote:
ORIGINAL: subspaceseven "Individuals entering into society, must give up a share of liberty to preserve the rest. The magnitude of the sacrifice must depend as well on situation and circumstance, as on the object to be obtained." Most of the gun-convos I've ever seen have centred on what are called 'positive freedoms' - freedoms to do X or Y. This omits (deliberately or otherwise) 'negative freedoms' - freedom *from* X or Y. Me, a few days ago, at around midnight, I walked home through an unlit park in a town centre carrying roughly two hundred pounds of shopping. I had no fear of anyone pulling a gun on me. Such a fear is rare in the UK, natch.
_____________________________
"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy " About damn time...wooot!!' Me
|