Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Edict


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive >> RE: Edict Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Edict - 12/22/2012 11:01:17 AM   
Aderious511


Posts: 58
Joined: 5/11/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl
For the guys that stopped talking to me because I refused.....big whoop. I never had a shortage of suitors and ended up incredibly happy with an amazing guy.


You own a vagina. All you need to find a suitor is a pulse. You don't have the slightest, faintest, vaguest hint of a conception of what it's like to be a guy trying to meet attractive girls on sites like these. The odds are absolutely atrocious. You're far more likely to be struck by lightning than a guy is to find an 18-21 year old, attractive submissive girl who weighs under 130 lbs here.

If you had any intellectual curiosity, you'd make a male dom profile one of these days and starting messaging female subs, just to see what it's like to sit on the other side of the fence. But you won't do that, of course. You're perfectly happy with your lot in life, having been born with a vagina and thus being guaranteed reproductive success simply by virtue of your anatomy.

There is nothing that men won't do for the chance to obtain sex.

quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl
Someone that asked me to prove who I am before we'd even met....I wasn't interested. Basically, if you want to start off a relationship by saying I need to prove that I'm not a liar, you're not good relationship material anyway.


Right, right. I'm sure it would never occur to you or any other womyn to ask a guy, prior to dating, 1) whether he was married or in a relationship, 2) whether he had a criminal record, 3) whether he was employed, 4) whether he had misogynistic views towards wimmin, 5) whether he had children or wanted them, 6) whether he had his own place and car.

These things are obviously totally irrelevant. You should just assume the answers to all of them and jump right into the relationship. Funny though, on every single dating site I've ever been to, wimmin ask precisely these types of questions of men before they start dating them. So maybe your gender should take some of its own medicine. Maybe you should be out there railing against wimmin who dare to ask these questions of their potential male suitors.

You want a guy with a job, a house, who isn't cheating on his wife, etc...?
Great. We want a bitch who can make our dicks hard. So you ask us about our careers, and we'll ask you about your bodies. Both parties verify themselves to one another.

< Message edited by Aderious511 -- 12/22/2012 11:10:04 AM >

(in reply to OsideGirl)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Edict - 12/22/2012 11:06:00 AM   
OsideGirl


Posts: 14441
Joined: 7/1/2005
From: United States
Status: offline 		Actually, it's because I have different standards than you did. I never did put much credence in looks.

A good looking asshole is still an asshole.

_____________________________

Give a girl the right shoes and she will conquer the world. ~ Marilyn Monroe

The Accelerated Velocity of Terminological Inexactitude

(in reply to Aderious511)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Edict - 12/22/2012 11:08:43 AM   
Aderious511


Posts: 58
Joined: 5/11/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl
Actually, it's because I have different standards than you did. I never did put much credence in looks.


No one who practices the so-called BDSM "lifestyle" "puts much credence in looks", i.e., there are no conventionally attractive people practicing BDSM. That is what I have stated over and over and over again, nearly every time I post. It is so obvious that only the massively dense and deluded could fail to see it. Yet you take every opportunity to bash and denigrate those who haven't completely wasted themselves and given up on looking remotely attractive. Methinks -- nay, meknows -- you are a bitter, jealous and spiteful lot.

Attractiveness is largely objective, not subjective. And you, poor mischlings, know this all too well.

< Message edited by Aderious511 -- 12/22/2012 11:21:39 AM >

(in reply to OsideGirl)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Edict - 12/22/2012 11:19:07 AM   
Aderious511


Posts: 58
Joined: 5/11/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: littleone14
Are you serious? You're saying we're subs because we're fat? Because we hate our bodies? That has almost zero to do with it. Get over yourself!


1. Yes.
2. Yes.
3. Yes.
4. Then why is it that the average "femdomme" on this site is 15-30 lbs lighter and 3-5 points more attractive than her same-age sub counterpart? You can see this with your own eyes, on the front page, it's clear as fucking day. Especially among the younger crowd. The 18-25 year old femdommes here look like college cheerleader barbie dolls. The subs? Well...they look like sacks of shit. Rofl.
5. I'm over myself. Are you over you?

< Message edited by Aderious511 -- 12/22/2012 11:21:07 AM >

(in reply to littleone14)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Edict - 12/22/2012 11:24:27 AM   
Kaliko


Posts: 3381
Joined: 9/25/2010
Status: offline 		I was asked a number of times to chat on the phone prior to a first meet. That's fine. I do think that taking a picture while holding a piece of paper with the date on it is creepy as all fuck. I wouldn't date someone who asked me to do that, not because you need verification that I'm a woman, but because...Ew. That's too Silence-Of-The-Lambs-like for me.

I've even Skyped before a first meet, and that worked out really well. :)

I also don't think it's awful to want a full-body shot of a woman before you meet, if that's important to you. (As long as it's not done in that creepy way.) Upon the advice of someone a year or so ago, I took some body shots (clothed...um, mostly) to post on my profile. He specifically said pretty much what you did - that if I didn't do it, men will think I'm hiding my body for a reason. I'll tell you something, though...when it mattered (or rather, when he mattered), I took it upon myself to be sure he knew what I looked like before our first meet. Even though it might not be important to me, it might be important to him.

So no, I don't think either of those things is so far-fetched to require before first meeting. It might also depend on how much effort is going into your first meet. Are you just meeting for a coffee a block away? Don't worry so much about it. Are you driving an hour and going to dinner? Then I don't blame you for wanting to confirm that A. she's a woman and that B. you're actually physically attracted to her.

(in reply to Dirk1986)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Edict - 12/22/2012 11:31:19 AM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aderious511

quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl
For the guys that stopped talking to me because I refused.....big whoop. I never had a shortage of suitors and ended up incredibly happy with an amazing guy.


You own a vagina. All you need to find a suitor is a pulse. You don't have the slightest, faintest, vaguest hint of a conception of what it's like to be a guy trying to meet attractive girls on sites like these. The odds are absolutely atrocious. You're far more likely to be struck by lightning than a guy is to find an 18-21 year old, attractive submissive girl who weighs under 130 lbs here.

If you had any intellectual curiosity, you'd make a male dom profile one of these days and starting messaging female subs, just to see what it's like to sit on the other side of the fence. But you won't do that, of course. You're perfectly happy with your lot in life, having been born with a vagina and thus being guaranteed reproductive success simply by virtue of your anatomy.

There is nothing that men won't do for the chance to obtain sex.

quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl
Someone that asked me to prove who I am before we'd even met....I wasn't interested. Basically, if you want to start off a relationship by saying I need to prove that I'm not a liar, you're not good relationship material anyway.


Right, right. I'm sure it would never occur to you or any other womyn to ask a guy, prior to dating, 1) whether he was married or in a relationship, 2) whether he had a criminal record, 3) whether he was employed, 4) whether he had misogynistic views towards wimmin, 5) whether he had children or wanted them, 6) whether he had his own place and car.

These things are obviously totally irrelevant. You should just assume the answers to all of them and jump right into the relationship. Funny though, on every single dating site I've ever been to, wimmin ask precisely these types of questions of men before they start dating them. So maybe your gender should take some of its own medicine. Maybe you should be out there railing against wimmin who dare to ask these questions of their potential male suitors.

You want a guy with a job, a house, who isn't cheating on his wife, etc...?
Great. We want a bitch who can make our dicks hard. So you ask us about our careers, and we'll ask you about your bodies. Both parties verify themselves to one another.


Yanno dude, if you're so fucking great why in the HELL are you playing around online, trying to hook up with women???

With the age range you are looking in, get thee to the nearest college town. Seriously.


_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to Aderious511)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Edict - 12/22/2012 11:36:01 AM   
Aderious511


Posts: 58
Joined: 5/11/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kaliko
I was asked a number of times to chat on the phone prior to a first meet. That's fine. I do think that taking a picture while holding a piece of paper with the date on it is creepy as all fuck. I wouldn't date someone who asked me to do that, not because you need verification that I'm a woman, but because...Ew. That's too Silence-Of-The-Lambs-like for me.


LOL. What a hilarious attitude to have. That will take you far in life. "Verifying myself is Silence of the Lambs! What is this guy, a serial killer? How dare he ask me to prove that I'm real on a site where 90% of the attractive female sub profiles are made by fat homosexual men?"

There are entire sites where doing something like that is a prerequisite to becoming a member. And -- surprise, surprise -- on those sites, the profiles are 99% legit, as opposed to being 99% fake on here. But you guys obviously love the bullshit on here. You wouldn't have it any other way. Apparently all of the fakes are "obvious" to spot. You must have advanced level telepathy. Last time I checked, it was dirt easy to go on any random social site, steal pics of anyone you'd like, and then write a profile based on those pics. The internet is notorious as being home to liars, fakers, scammers, and other rogues. But you guys are too smart to fall for any of it, apparently.

It's impossible for middle-aged men to pose as attractive young women online. That's why there's a story about it happening every few months in the news, going all the way back to the earliest chat rooms in the 90's. Because it's so hard to do, right?

I sure hope you're letting all your teenage kids go online unsupervised and talk to whomever they want. Wouldn't want to be hypocrites, would we? After all, teens have no interest in talking to old men. Since old men clearly would never pose as young people, there's no reason to think your teens would ever have contact with these people online.

Amirite?

< Message edited by Aderious511 -- 12/22/2012 11:41:11 AM >

(in reply to Kaliko)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Edict - 12/22/2012 11:40:33 AM   
JeffBC


Posts: 5799
Joined: 2/12/2012
From: Canada
Status: offline 		So basically you want to figure out if the person you are talking to is:

a) Actually female (the voice would help with this)
b) Actually cute (the video would help with this)
c) Wants to "make this all go now"

The answer is obvious. Why not simply go ahead and be honest, calm, and dominant? You state clearly what you want in unambiguous terms and you state that you're only looking for partners who are of a similar mindset to you. Then you'll find people who, just like you, will wish to move to at least a non-sexual skype video chat promptly.

If I was looking to add a 3rd I'd be pushing for a real life meet pretty much instantly. Any woman who could not "take the risk" of getting a cup of coffee with a potentially interesting stranger at Starbucks just plain isn't a good match for me on any number of levels. I'd be using sites like this as a phone book only. My actual interest is in real life and I assume theirs would be also.

That being said there's the other obvious reason why she might not want to meet with me -- she didn't find me potentially interesting. It's on me to "be interesting" and whatever I have provided her before I ask to meet has to be sufficient to that task. I can pretty much guarantee that my initial messages wouldn't look even remotely "scammer-like" nor do I come off as a predator but I still have to be interesting. I have to assume you're doing more than "Hey baby, let's skype." What are you doing and how's it working?


_____________________________

I'm a lover of "what is", not because I'm a spiritual person, but because it hurts when I argue with reality. -- Bryon Katie
"You're humbly arrogant" -- sunshinemiss
officially a member of the K Crowd

(in reply to Dirk1986)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Edict - 12/22/2012 11:41:35 AM   
Kaliko


Posts: 3381
Joined: 9/25/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aderious511

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kaliko
I was asked a number of times to chat on the phone prior to a first meet. That's fine. I do think that taking a picture while holding a piece of paper with the date on it is creepy as all fuck. I wouldn't date someone who asked me to do that, not because you need verification that I'm a woman, but because...Ew. That's too Silence-Of-The-Lambs-like for me.


LOL. What a hilarious attitude to have. That will take you far in life. "Verifying myself is Silence of the Lambs! What is this guy, a serial killer? How dare he ask me to prove that I'm real on a site where 90% of the attractive female sub profiles are made by fat homosexual men?"

There are entire sites where doing something like that is a prerequisite to becoming a member. And -- surprise, surprise -- on those sites, the profiles are 99% legit, as opposed to being 99% fake on here. But you guys obviously love the bullshit on here. You wouldn't have it any other way. Apparently all of the fakes are "obvious" to spot. You must have advanced level telepathy. Last time I checked, it was dirt easy to go on any random social site, steal pics of anyone you'd like, and then write a profile based on those pics. The internet is notorious as being home to liars, fakers, scammers, and other rogues. But you guys are too smart to fall for any of it, apparently.

It's impossible for middle-aged men to pose as attractive young women online. That's why there's a story about it happening every few months in the news, going all the way back to the earliest chat rooms in the 90's. Because it's so hard to do, right?

I sure hope you're letting all your teenage kids go online unsupervised. Wouldn't want to be hypocrites, would we? After all, teens have no interest in talking to old men. Since old men clearly would never pose as young people, there's no reason to think your teens would ever have contact with these people online.

Amirite?


Uh...do you want to re-read my post? I was agreeing with you. Much to my chagrin.

(in reply to Aderious511)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Edict - 12/22/2012 11:43:39 AM   
Aderious511


Posts: 58
Joined: 5/11/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC
If I was looking to add a 3rd I'd be pushing for a real life meet pretty much instantly. Any woman who could not "take the risk" of getting a cup of coffee with a potentially interesting stranger at Starbucks just plain isn't a good match for me on any number of levels. I'd be using sites like this as a phone book only. My actual interest is in real life and I assume theirs would be also.


Bravo for a bit of common sense. A rare sight on these forums. I have a journal entry very much like what you just wrote.

Social sites and porn/erotic fantasy sites should never be mixed. One is for meeting, the other is for masturbating (or talking, which is the female equivalent of jerking off).

< Message edited by Aderious511 -- 12/22/2012 11:48:34 AM >

(in reply to JeffBC)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Edict - 12/22/2012 11:43:46 AM   
JeffBC


Posts: 5799
Joined: 2/12/2012
From: Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kaliko
Uh...do you want to re-read my post? I was agreeing with you. Much to my chagrin.

LOLOL. Don't you just hate it when that happens?


_____________________________

I'm a lover of "what is", not because I'm a spiritual person, but because it hurts when I argue with reality. -- Bryon Katie
"You're humbly arrogant" -- sunshinemiss
officially a member of the K Crowd

(in reply to Kaliko)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Edict - 12/22/2012 11:45:13 AM   
Aderious511


Posts: 58
Joined: 5/11/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kaliko
Uh...do you want to re-read my post? I was agreeing with you. Much to my chagrin.


I didn't read past the first paragraph, admittedly. Now that I have, I don't take back anything I wrote. I would simply direct it at others on this site rather than you.

(in reply to Kaliko)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Edict - 12/22/2012 11:51:22 AM   
AthenaSurrenders


Posts: 3582
Joined: 3/15/2012
Status: offline 		I've said this before but it bears repeating: all these hideous cretins you so despise are out there having fulfilling, successful kinky relationships and sex. You're not finding what you seek, despite having the advantage of your low body-fat percentage. You must be pretty crappy in other aspects then, if you're still not doing as well as all the ugly people round here.

_____________________________

Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?

(in reply to Aderious511)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Edict - 12/22/2012 11:56:02 AM   
Aderious511


Posts: 58
Joined: 5/11/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AthenaSurrenders

I've said this before but it bears repeating: all these hideous cretins you so despise are out there having fulfilling, successful kinky relationships and sex.


You've said it before and I refuted it before. You were wrong then and you are still wrong now. Nothing has changed. I made a journal entry to deal with this faulty line of reasoning. I strongly suggest you read it and commit its points to heart.

The answer is: "No they're not." I have spoken to numerous other Doms and couples here. The Doms tell me, almost without exception, that they have had absolutely no luck on here. They are sitting in exactly the same boat as me, despite being all over the map in terms of age, race, background, appearance, experience, etc... The couples tell me, almost without exception, that they did NOT meet on this POS site, but elsewhere (95% of the time real life). The sub girls tell me, almost without exception, that they have never met anyone off this site and don't intend to. Even "dommes" complain that all of the young female subs on this site are flakes and it's impossible to meet them in real life.

So quit spouting your BS. It's wrong. Patently false. You are lying.

quote:

ORIGINAL: AthenaSurrenders
You're not finding what you seek,


Answer this before proceeding: How do you know? How do you know I'm not finding what I seek? What do you know about me? Do you know my name? My occupation? My address? My job? My relationship status? If so, post them here, I give you full consent to do so.

What do you know about me and where do you get off thinking that you can make baseless assumptions about my personal life?

No, really: Answer the question.

< Message edited by Aderious511 -- 12/22/2012 12:04:55 PM >

(in reply to AthenaSurrenders)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Edict - 12/22/2012 11:57:42 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aderious511

No they're not. I have spoken to numerous other Doms and couples here.

I've had good luck here. Maybe you just talk to losers.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to Aderious511)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Edict - 12/22/2012 11:59:36 AM   
Aderious511


Posts: 58
Joined: 5/11/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
I've had good luck here. Maybe you just talk to losers.


Then post a photo or any evidence whatsoever of the last female entity you met on this site who was under 30 years old and weighed less than 160 lbs. Because I can post multiple photos of girls I've not only met, but fucked, who fit that description.

The photo does not have to be explicit. It can be as tame as you want. I'll wait.

< Message edited by Aderious511 -- 12/22/2012 12:02:09 PM >

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Edict - 12/22/2012 12:03:31 PM   
AthenaSurrenders


Posts: 3582
Joined: 3/15/2012
Status: offline 		My assumption is based on the fact that I can't imagine anyone would be so sad or bored as to spend so much time arguing on a site which they think is useless, interacting with people they hold in contempt, if they had a satisfying relationship/play-partner. I would guess that people who were already getting their needs met wouldn't bother with such a pointless endeavor. But, you're right, I don't know your personal details (Dan?) and so maybe I'm wrong, and you are that sad.

_____________________________

Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?

(in reply to Aderious511)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Edict - 12/22/2012 12:04:33 PM   
VideoAdminTheta


Posts: 3967
Joined: 10/24/2009
Status: offline 		I will hope that the picture challenge won't be taken seriously and actually done. I don't believe this thread was about the appearance of members and the topic may be drifting a bit further than it should. Maybe everyone could get back to addressing what the OP is asking and not turning the thread into something it wasn't meant to be. Please.

Thank you

(in reply to Aderious511)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Edict - 12/22/2012 12:05:22 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aderious511

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
I've had good luck here. Maybe you just talk to losers.


Then post a photo or any evidence whatsoever of the last female entity you met on this site who was under 30 years old and weighed less than 160 lbs. Because I can post multiple photos of girls I've not only met, but fucked, who fit that description.

The photo does not have to be explicit. It can be as tame as you want. I'll wait.

Do you have permission to post pictures of partners on here or are you a glutton for lawsuits?

Seriously, that's about the STUPIDEST fucking thing Ive heard lately.

As for posting, how would you be sure I don't just pick up candid pics out of an album?


_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to Aderious511)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Edict - 12/22/2012 12:11:41 PM   
Aderious511


Posts: 58
Joined: 5/11/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AthenaSurrenders
My assumption is based on the fact that I can't imagine anyone would be so sad or bored as to spend so much time arguing on a site which they think is useless, interacting with people they hold in contempt, if they had a satisfying relationship/play-partner. I would guess that people who were already getting their needs met wouldn't bother with such a pointless endeavor. But, you're right, I don't know your personal details (Dan?) and so maybe I'm wrong, and you are that sad.


You are entirely wrong in your personal assumptions about me, and I come here because I like debating. I do not spend excess amounts of time here. I post here once or twice a month, for a couple hours at a time, and that's it. How much time do you waste on the telly? I don't watch TV. I don't follow pro sports. I don't drink alcohol. I don't hang out at bars or nightclubs, chit-chatting about meaningless bullshit with semi-coherent, inebriated people. On the whole, I reckon I waste FAR LESS of my time than the vast majority of my peers, including -- most likely -- you.

< Message edited by Aderious511 -- 12/22/2012 12:12:40 PM >

(in reply to AthenaSurrenders)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive >> RE: Edict Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.105