dcnovice
Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
Also I don't understand why an opinion in P & R always needs to be backed up by sources or linked to some article. If I wanted to parrot the same opinion as someone's article, editorial or blog, then why would I need to post in the first place? This isn't high school or college, but a message board on a kinky website. If I wanted to know what a large section of the media thinks on a given topic I'd set up a news feed on my computer. In my village on the banks of the Potomac, there's a popular saying often attributed to Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan: "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts." Or her own, of course. That often comes to mind as I skim P&R threads, for three reasons: (a) Facts impinge on P&R topics in a way that they may not elsewhere. If someone says, "I think the masterly thing to do in this situation is X," so be it. Ditto for "My favorite kind of pie is pecan." If someone says, on the other hand, "Unions destroyed the auto industry," I think one's entitled to say, "What's your basis for that assertion? What roles did management and the rise of imports play?" (b) Posters do sometimes confuse their own opinions with facts, as with "It's healthier for a child to grow up with opposite-sex parents than same-sex ones." Asking for a source is the P&R way of saying, "Is this actually true, or are you pulling it out of your hindquarters?" (c) People also draw "facts" from sources with highly varying degrees of credibility. Thus we had a fair bit of pre-election discussion, rooted in a poorly sources YouTube video, on "Obama phones," only to learn after folks did some digging that the program in question long predated the current administration.
_____________________________
No matter how cynical you become, it's never enough to keep up. JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE
|