RE: The decline of collarme (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message

LaTigresse -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 12:20:30 PM)

Of course we agree. We make the choice to be here or not. Still doesn't mean that the rules aren't loopy and full of holes, for loopy people to play with.

One would hope that the ones toying with said rules have some degree of common sense and intelligence. That is not always the case. No one has yet said that there is a rule that states we cannot point out that lack there of.



tazzygirl -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 12:22:32 PM)

I actually like the idea of putting all the various rules posted by mods over the years into one place.... even if its just a list of links.



Hillwilliam -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 12:24:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I actually like the idea of putting all the various rules posted by mods over the years into one place.... even if its just a list of links.

That's an awesome idea.

Post em and follow em.



tazzygirl -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 12:24:39 PM)

quote:

Does that give some self appointed hall monitor the authority to make up the rules to suit themselves?


No, I would suppose it gives it to the owners and Alpha.

quote:

Where will it end?
Is nappy, graham crackers and milk scheduled for 3PM today?


Well, its almost 330 here.... and you are a bit cranky... are you late for your nap?

quote:

As I said earlier, if you're cruising down the interstate on a nice sunny traffic free day at 65 MPH in a 65 MPH zone, what do you do if a trooper stops you and writes a ticket saying "I don't care what the limit is, you shouldn't be doing 65 here. I want people to do 50. Your court date is wednesday at 9AM. Have a nice day."?


So you get a warning letter and equate that to a ticket?



Moonhead -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 12:26:40 PM)

I think he's making a point about displays of abused authority rather than a direct analogy.



LaTigresse -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 12:26:51 PM)

ACTually...........I would equate a warning letter about vague non existent rules..........to harassment.



Hillwilliam -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 12:28:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

As I said earlier, if you're cruising down the interstate on a nice sunny traffic free day at 65 MPH in a 65 MPH zone, what do you do if a trooper stops you and writes a ticket saying "I don't care what the limit is, you shouldn't be doing 65 here. I want people to do 50. Your court date is wednesday at 9AM. Have a nice day."?


So you get a warning letter and equate that to a ticket?

Don't act so damn obtuse. You're amazingly intelligent. Don't act like you aren't. It's an analogy. Answer the question if you please.

A person in authority acts in a way that not only oversteps their authority but ignores the existing written statutes. what do you do?



tazzygirl -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 12:29:58 PM)

I see it as a written notification to you, personally, that this is against the rules. Im really curious as to how that could upset you.

You wanted notification, they are giving notification before taking any action, yes?



Hillwilliam -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 12:35:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I see it as a written notification to you, personally, that this is against the rules. Im really curious as to how that could upset you.

You wanted notification, they are giving notification before taking any action, yes?

It is NOT against the rules though. N-O-T. What part of NOT is incomprehensible. Acting obtuse doesn't become you.

I therefore see it as either:

A: Ignorance
or
B: Harassment

Do you get upset when people in authority harass you?
Do you get upset when people in authority are ignorant and it affects you negatively?



Moonhead -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 12:35:11 PM)

Okay, it was a direct analogy, then.
Arse.



tazzygirl -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 12:38:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I see it as a written notification to you, personally, that this is against the rules. Im really curious as to how that could upset you.

You wanted notification, they are giving notification before taking any action, yes?

It is NOT against the rules though. N-O-T. What part of NOT is incomprehensible. Acting obtuse doesn't become you.

I therefore see it as either:

A: Ignorance
or
B: Harassment

Do you get upset when people in authority harass you?
Do you get upset when people in authority are ignorant and it affects you negatively?


And if you agree to a TOS that clearly states its listed rules are not all inclusive... what does that mean to you?



Politesub53 -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 12:40:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Nonsense: nobody eats faggots that regularly, even oop norf:
[img]http://thereturnofwolfgangpuck.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/faggots.jpg[/img]



I think you will find they are being eaten more and more, even down sarf, since Cameron got in.

That`ll teach me to vote for the bugger .



LaTigresse -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 12:41:12 PM)

That means to ME, that someone did a bang up job of covering ass so putzes can abuse the powers they've been given.



Hillwilliam -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 12:41:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I see it as a written notification to you, personally, that this is against the rules. Im really curious as to how that could upset you.

You wanted notification, they are giving notification before taking any action, yes?

It is NOT against the rules though. N-O-T. What part of NOT is incomprehensible. Acting obtuse doesn't become you.

I therefore see it as either:

A: Ignorance
or
B: Harassment

Do you get upset when people in authority harass you?
Do you get upset when people in authority are ignorant and it affects you negatively?


And if you agree to a TOS that clearly states its listed rules are not all inclusive... what does that mean to you?

That means there is room for interpretation. There is a difference between grey areas and totally making shit up claiming it is part of TOS.

Im still waiting for a straight yes/no answer to these questions.

Do you get upset when people in authority harass you?
Do you get upset when people in authority are ignorant and it affects you negatively?

yes or no. It's not complicated.



needlesandpins -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 12:42:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I see it as a written notification to you, personally, that this is against the rules. Im really curious as to how that could upset you.

You wanted notification, they are giving notification before taking any action, yes?


why don't you just answer his question instead of being evasive? deliberately avoiding what he's saying, and messing about with the context of it is not showing you in good light.

there are rules. we do agree to them as written. we do not agree to have them made up on the spur of the moment to suit the mod in question. nore can they say that an action is one thing to suit themselves when in actual fact it's something else.

deliberately baiting comes to mind.

needles



tazzygirl -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 12:42:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

That means to ME, that someone did a bang up job of covering ass so putzes can abuse the powers they've been given.


That I cannot argue with... lawyers are good at that.



tazzygirl -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 12:44:02 PM)

quote:

Do you get upset when people in authority harass you?
Do you get upset when people in authority are ignorant and it affects you negatively?


There is no yes or no here. What you view as harassment/ignorance, in this case, I do not.



tazzygirl -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 12:45:10 PM)

quote:

why don't you just answer his question instead of being evasive? deliberately avoiding what he's saying, and messing about with the context of it is not showing you in good light.


Ohhhhhhhhhhh so NOW you want to address me.... lol



needlesandpins -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 12:50:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I see it as a written notification to you, personally, that this is against the rules. Im really curious as to how that could upset you.

You wanted notification, they are giving notification before taking any action, yes?

It is NOT against the rules though. N-O-T. What part of NOT is incomprehensible. Acting obtuse doesn't become you.

I therefore see it as either:

A: Ignorance
or
B: Harassment

Do you get upset when people in authority harass you? YES
Do you get upset when people in authority are ignorant and it affects you negatively?


And if you agree to a TOS that clearly states its listed rules are not all inclusive... what does that mean to you?

That means there is room for interpretation. There is a difference between grey areas and totally making shit up claiming it is part of TOS.

Im still waiting for a straight yes/no answer to these questions.

Do you get upset when people in authority harass you? YES
Do you get upset when people in authority are ignorant and it affects you negatively? YES


yes or no. It's not complicated.


see? some of us can do it.

needles



doctorgrey -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 12:53:54 PM)

What's a Graham Cracker?

DrG



Page: <<   < prev  28 29 [30] 31 32   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
5.078125E-02