tazzygirl
Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
They don't have to be art critics. If they see a pic of a person in a photo, even if it's not the profile person they can let it go until someone reports it - just like they do now. If it isn't, and its an obvious pic not of the person, it initially gets kicked out unless the person appeals the decision. Define obvious? If its a man's profile, and he posts a woman's pic, how do they know that isnt his slave, or his mistress, and he has either rexpressed permission by ownership, or orders, to place that photo? quote:
As far as I'm concerned, unless you happen to have a personal piece of Warhol's art that he personally painted just for you, all of his works are commercial, up for public viewing, and certainly should not be used as a photo on a profile. That isnt the definition of commercial artwork. quote:
Maybe we are confusing what you call 'commercial' and what I interpret the word commercial to be? To me, anything on public display, anywhere, makes it commercial. Why? Because it is being used to draw in money from other external sources even if not from the sale of the art itself. I gave you the definition. commercial art noun graphic art created specifically for commercial uses, especially for advertising, illustrations in magazines or books, or the like. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/commercial+art Not all of Warhol's work is commercial artwork.
_____________________________
Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt. RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11 Duchess of Dissent 1 Dont judge me because I sin differently than you. If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.
|