meatcleaver
Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML As Hill said, we are talking about psychopathology here. There is ample evidence from anthropology that random killing within our species is not part of our basic nature. Are you serious? There are random killings everyday from a mainstream point of view, they probably won't be random to the perpetrator, it is all a matter of perception. How do you know Lanza's killings were random in his mind? Maybe he had a very good rationalisation in his head about why he should commit this act. Maybe he saw it as an act of vengence on the society he found oppressive? The fact is we will never know. quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML This was discussed in another thread, wasn't it, about soldiers who could not kill even under fire? You make a sweeping statement about human nature without any supporting evidence. Agression may be part of our make up but we socialize it. The notion that spree killing is common to human nature is absurd. Socialisation and context is important but there is the whole history of humanity that proves you wrong, people can find it quite easy to kill in the right circumstances. Given the culture Lanza came from where violence and revenge is glorified and violence is seen as a solution to most problems and given him being a young impressionable male of an age where a young mind has little problem mixing fantasy with reality, Lanza could quite easily see society giving him permission to be violent. There is no need for psychopathology to be involved here, socialisation and the susceptability of a yong mind to stress could be trigger enough.
< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 1/4/2013 9:04:11 AM >
_____________________________
There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.
|