Chesterfield91 -> RE: Male victimization in modern society. (1/6/2013 1:35:24 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Baroana So, when you speak of this widespread problem in society, what you really mean is that your brother had an incident. Now, let's pick apart this transaction, and we will assume it happened the way you say (i.e. the way he told you it happened). A girl kneed your brother in the balls for a laugh. How do we know it was for a laugh? Is that what she said? If so, then she's a sadist and a criminal, and your brother should have immediately reported her to the appropriate authorities. Did he do so, or did he react in kind with violence? He chose the latter. Are you starting to see then why the "epidemic" of violence against men by women, if there is one, might not be coming to light?* Your brother then instinctively reacted with a punch in the face??? If those are your brother's instincts, then he had better get some fucking new ones quick before he finds himself in prison for a long time. When someone attacks me my instict is to do what I can to protect myself, so I can believe it. He didn't punch her and then keep on punching her. She kneed him in the balls, and he reacted. He actually felt bad about it afterwards. She said it was for a laugh yes. I've seen this happen quite a few times actually, woman hits man, man defends himself, and the man is the bad guy. quote:
ORIGINAL: Baroana This is a good time to remember that we are discussing an isolated case here, and these events do not necessarily reflect the nature of men in general or women in general. In this specific case, though, your brother got thoroughly outsmarted by this girl. First, your brother make the completely dumb mistake of retaliating rather than reporting the attack on him. Secondly, by punching the girl in the face he picked the stupidest possible way to retaliate (the girl - unlike your brother - chose to inflict an injury that wouldn't leave a huge fucking black and blue mark as evidence for the world to see). Now what was your point again? Also, how old were these two parties at the time? ---- * As for an epidemic of violence against men by men, which is something I think you mentioned earlier ... well gee, kid, I know you are quite young and just joining us, but the fact that men are violent - to each other and to women - is hardly fucking news in this world. If you don't like it, then start an annual parade or 5k or whatever the hell you want to do. No one's stopping you. They were both 16 at the time. My point again was that much of the time female on male violence is unchallenged where male on female violence is not. I just responded to the idea that women are more likely to be victims of violent crime, they're not. Which is why I don't understand the whole "stop violence against women" thing. Why only women?
|
|
|
|