RE: Piers or Alex Jones... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


tazzygirl -> RE: Piers or Alex Jones... (1/11/2013 3:02:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

What the fuck are you yammering on about now???

when the guns that look like assault weapons ban fails once again to make a dent in crime what will you day to the proposition that all repeaters must be banned pay attention it whould have been obvious what I meant


No, damn, again, you have no reading comprehension skills whe n it comes to this topic.

quote:

in your own requote you will see that L said confiscation will come up when THIS BAN DOESN'T PUT AND END TO CRIME


Lucy said no such thing in my requote. Again, you spouting off ab out things, making up lies, to try and prove your point.




tazzygirl -> RE: Piers or Alex Jones... (1/11/2013 3:04:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it. - Attributed to T. Jefferson


Has anyone tried to ban all weapons?



It's implicit in the scheme.

You really are not up to this.


OHHHHHHHHHHH so because YOU believe it will happen... the it must happen... yet you have zero proof that it will happen... But then try and say I cannot possibly understand what you believe.. because you believe such and such is happening without one piece of proof.

Got it.

~chuckles




BamaD -> RE: Piers or Alex Jones... (1/11/2013 3:05:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

but if the government ever wanted to round them up they sure would know where to go and get em.


But, according to many, that is exactly what the government wants to do. So, whats stopping them?

ca and ny used registration of guns that look like assault weapons for exactly that purpose


Links.. Im way past taking your word for anything

the forbiddenknowledg.com
remember the rule about dening uncomfortable facts




tazzygirl -> RE: Piers or Alex Jones... (1/11/2013 3:06:38 PM)

wtf?

This webpage is not available

Learn to give proper links




BamaD -> RE: Piers or Alex Jones... (1/11/2013 3:07:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

What the fuck are you yammering on about now???

when the guns that look like assault weapons ban fails once again to make a dent in crime what will you day to the proposition that all repeaters must be banned pay attention it whould have been obvious what I meant


No, damn, again, you have no reading comprehension skills whe n it comes to this topic.

quote:

in your own requote you will see that L said confiscation will come up when THIS BAN DOESN'T PUT AND END TO CRIME


Lucy said no such thing in my requote. Again, you spouting off ab out things, making up lies, to try and prove your point.

typo that was supposed to be an I not an L so maybe you want to apologize for the lie crap




BamaD -> RE: Piers or Alex Jones... (1/11/2013 3:08:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

wtf?

This webpage is not available

Learn to give proper links

then type in Ca sks confiscation thats how I found it




Yachtie -> RE: Piers or Alex Jones... (1/11/2013 3:09:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it. - Attributed to T. Jefferson


Has anyone tried to ban all weapons?



It's implicit in the scheme.

You really are not up to this.


OHHHHHHHHHHH so because YOU believe it will happen... the it must happen... yet you have zero proof that it will happen... But then try and say I cannot possibly understand what you believe.. because you believe such and such is happening without one piece of proof.

Got it.

~chuckles



It's been stated and shown in threads here time and time again. It's an historical inevitability so long as the ideology is pressed forward. The problem is your inability to comprehend the historical significance.

You are not up to the task at hand.




BamaD -> RE: Piers or Alex Jones... (1/11/2013 3:09:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

wtf?

This webpage is not available

Learn to give proper links

not my fault if the page id that showed up was wrong
try decafe




tazzygirl -> RE: Piers or Alex Jones... (1/11/2013 3:39:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

What the fuck are you yammering on about now???

when the guns that look like assault weapons ban fails once again to make a dent in crime what will you day to the proposition that all repeaters must be banned pay attention it whould have been obvious what I meant


No, damn, again, you have no reading comprehension skills whe n it comes to this topic.

quote:

in your own requote you will see that L said confiscation will come up when THIS BAN DOESN'T PUT AND END TO CRIME


Lucy said no such thing in my requote. Again, you spouting off ab out things, making up lies, to try and prove your point.

typo that was supposed to be an I not an L so maybe you want to apologize for the lie crap


So I am supposed to apologize because YOU made a typo? And You stating it within a thread doesnt make it FACT... a FACT you have yet to prove.




tazzygirl -> RE: Piers or Alex Jones... (1/11/2013 3:41:47 PM)

quote:

It's been stated and shown in threads here time and time again. It's an historical inevitability so long as the ideology is pressed forward. The problem is your inability to comprehend the historical significance.

You are not up to the task at hand.


And yet you cannot show who is pressing the ideology of permanent gun bans forward. The only ones in power I see saying anything about permanent bans is those against it.





BamaD -> RE: Piers or Alex Jones... (1/11/2013 3:46:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

What the fuck are you yammering on about now???

when the guns that look like assault weapons ban fails once again to make a dent in crime what will you day to the proposition that all repeaters must be banned pay attention it whould have been obvious what I meant


No, damn, again, you have no reading comprehension skills whe n it comes to this topic.

quote:

in your own requote you will see that L said confiscation will come up when THIS BAN DOESN'T PUT AND END TO CRIME


Lucy said no such thing in my requote. Again, you spouting off ab out things, making up lies, to try and prove your point.

typo that was supposed to be an I not an L so maybe you want to apologize for the lie crap


So I am supposed to apologize because YOU made a typo? And You stating it within a thread doesnt make it FACT... a FACT you have yet to prove.

you used it as proof that I am a liar you can apologize for the mixup




Lucylastic -> RE: Piers or Alex Jones... (1/11/2013 3:50:36 PM)

WHO even said..violence will end?? EVER??? to suggest such a thing is ridiculous
Its specious to even attempt to suggest anyone has said such a thing, OR have such an expectation.
what a pathetic attempt to assert its a stance.

The country with the most lax gun control in the "first" world. Is the country with the largest gun deaths in the "first world.
Simple. To suggest that violent crime is an excuse to not do something about gun deaths is truly ignoring the truth.
As for the other comments.. Bama, you arenot being taken seriously by me, and your attempts to backpeddle by using obfuscation is being taken as just that, I will not respond.
Oh, and btw, if YOU ignore a typo.... and make it about me, dont expect tazzy to apologise, its YOU that did it and either didnt change it within the time limit, OH look you still can......
why not just do that? you have four minutes




BamaD -> RE: Piers or Alex Jones... (1/11/2013 3:51:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

It's been stated and shown in threads here time and time again. It's an historical inevitability so long as the ideology is pressed forward. The problem is your inability to comprehend the historical significance.

You are not up to the task at hand.


And yet you cannot show who is pressing the ideology of permanent gun bans forward. The only ones in power I see saying anything about permanent bans is those against it.



Then you havn't been paying attention
The infamous Holder statement about brainwashing the American people against guns
Obamas statement that gun bans don't violate individual rights
If you don't know about these your not informend on the subject
come back when you are




tazzygirl -> RE: Piers or Alex Jones... (1/11/2013 3:52:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

wtf?

This webpage is not available

Learn to give proper links

not my fault if the page id that showed up was wrong
try decafe


no, why dont you try copying and pasting a link instead of fucking it up by misspelling it.

This is where it leads once the e is added to the end of forbiddenknowledge.com

http://richardzacks.com/

Your proof is a book written about Roosevelt in NYC in the 1890's.

Amazingly enough, I dont see anything in there, or the reviews, mentioning guns.

quote:

ca and ny used registration of guns that look like assault weapons for exactly that purpose


That was your claim... one you havent backed up yet.




tazzygirl -> RE: Piers or Alex Jones... (1/11/2013 3:53:47 PM)

quote:

Then you havn't been paying attention
The infamous Holder statement about brainwashing the American people against guns
Obamas statement that gun bans don't violate individual rights
If you don't know about these your not informend on the subject
come back when you are


Links.. else you are pulling it out your ass again.




TheRyan7 -> RE: Piers or Alex Jones... (1/11/2013 3:54:51 PM)

Id rather listen to a snobby british accent than a paranoid schitzo anyday. Regardless of there stance on guns.




tazzygirl -> RE: Piers or Alex Jones... (1/11/2013 3:55:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

What the fuck are you yammering on about now???

when the guns that look like assault weapons ban fails once again to make a dent in crime what will you day to the proposition that all repeaters must be banned pay attention it whould have been obvious what I meant


No, damn, again, you have no reading comprehension skills whe n it comes to this topic.

quote:

in your own requote you will see that L said confiscation will come up when THIS BAN DOESN'T PUT AND END TO CRIME


Lucy said no such thing in my requote. Again, you spouting off ab out things, making up lies, to try and prove your point.

typo that was supposed to be an I not an L so maybe you want to apologize for the lie crap


So I am supposed to apologize because YOU made a typo? And You stating it within a thread doesnt make it FACT... a FACT you have yet to prove.

you used it as proof that I am a liar you can apologize for the mixup


Fact... that statement was made by you.. not "L" as you claimed.

Fact... you have yet to prove that statement... and you cant.

Two "errors" in your statements shows a pattern of making up lies.

But, do me a favor... hold your breath waiting for an apology from me that you clearly do not deserve. [;)]




Lucylastic -> RE: Piers or Alex Jones... (1/11/2013 3:56:12 PM)

Obamas stance on guns

http://2012.presidential-candidates.org/Obama/Gun-Control.php

2012 Democratic Presidential Nominee
Current President of the United States

Barack Obama



Obama position on Gun Control

The Second Amendment: Individual or Collective Right?

Obama agrees to an individual's right to bear arms, in principle, but does not take it as an absolute right and considers it as a negotiable subject.

“I think it’s important for us to recognize that we’ve got a tradition of handgun ownership and gun ownership generally. And a lot of law-abiding citizens use it for hunting, for sportsmanship, and for protecting their families. We also have a violence on the streets that is the result of illegal handgun usage. And so I think there is nothing wrong with a community saying we are going to take those illegal handguns off the streets. And cracking down on the various loopholes that exist in terms of background checks for children, the mentally ill. We can have reasonable, thoughtful gun control measure that I think respect the Second Amendment and people’s traditions.”
April 16, 2008, Democratic Primary Debate, National Constitution Center in Philadelphia


Legislations

“I have always believed that the Second Amendment protects the right of individuals to bear arms, but I also identify with the need for crime-ravaged communities to save their children from the violence that plagues our streets through common-sense, effective safety measures. The Supreme Court has now endorsed that view, and while it ruled that the D.C. gun ban went too far, Justice Scalia himself acknowledged that this right is not absolute and subject to reasonable regulations enacted by local communities to keep their streets safe”
Obama commenting on the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling of upholding an individual’s right to bear arms and revoking a handgun legislation in Washington, D.C
June 26, 2008, Associated Press


"As a general principle, I believe that the Constitution confers an individual right to bear arms. But just because you have an individual right does not mean that the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of that right."
April 16, 2008, Democratic Primary Debate, National Constitution Center in Philadelphia




BamaD -> RE: Piers or Alex Jones... (1/11/2013 3:56:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

WHO even said..violence will end?? EVER??? to suggest such a thing is ridiculous
Its specious to even attempt to suggest anyone has said such a thing, OR have such an expectation.
what a pathetic attempt to assert its a stance.

The country with the most lax gun control in the "first" world. Is the country with the largest gun deaths in the "first world.
Simple. To suggest that violent crime is an excuse to not do something about gun deaths is truly ignoring the truth.
As for the other comments.. Bama, you arenot being taken seriously by me, and your attempts to backpeddle by using obfuscation is being taken as just that, I will not respond.
Oh, and btw, if YOU ignore a typo.... and make it about me, dont expect tazzy to apologise, its YOU that did it and either didnt change it within the time limit, OH look you still can......
why not just do that? you have four minutes


One she and you are the only ones who care about thhe typo
Two what do you call demanding proof of a current demand to confiscate when I said I expected it down the road when like the first guns that look like assault weapons ban this one doesn't work




tazzygirl -> RE: Piers or Alex Jones... (1/11/2013 3:57:42 PM)

Yet, Lucy, I dont have the facts because I am not listening to raving lunatics ranting about the possibility of someone coming in the middle of the night demanding their guns. [8|]




Page: <<   < prev  13 14 [15] 16 17   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
5.078125E-02