JeffBC
Posts: 5799
Joined: 2/12/2012 From: Canada Status: offline
|
Since oxymorons are, by definition, stupid and deceptive I'll pass on the whole CNC thing. But I'll try to give this a go anwyay. quote:
So, where are your boundaries when it comes to consensual non-consent? Do you equate removing consent for distress to be non-submissive? Carol and I don't do D/s by agreement and we don't do labels and we don't do consent. That sort of leaves us in the reality of the moment rather than the static roles of BDSM. So yes, if in some moment Carol thwarted my will in any way I'd have to read it as me failing to dom and her failing to sub. Such an event would be the end of the collar. Insofar as the original thread you derived this from I don't know what to make of it. I think that guy is mostly clueless. I could make obvious points about how the law might see his little play party but he and the cops can have that conversation. I'm more interested in why, exactly, he feels some random woman -- even one who's "submissive enough" like Carol and already someone's slave -- would extend that sort of trust to a relative stranger. He's basically asking for a casual TPE relationship. I wonder if he has even a remote clue why, exactly, someone like Carol would say "no boundaries" and mean it. Let's be serious. He is asking for carte-blanche except for a handful of listed limits agreed to before hand. Yeah right. Oh wait... she forgot to include "No insertion of objects larger than a basketball" Oh well... suck it up now bitch. We have to get this whole basketball scene done before the midgets show up. Oh wait.. you forgot to think about those also?
< Message edited by JeffBC -- 2/5/2013 9:17:40 PM >
_____________________________
I'm a lover of "what is", not because I'm a spiritual person, but because it hurts when I argue with reality. -- Bryon Katie "You're humbly arrogant" -- sunshinemiss officially a member of the K Crowd
|