xssve
Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
So, where are your boundaries when it comes to consensual non-consent? Do you equate removing consent for distress to be non-submissive? Concern for your own health and physical well being is not "non-submissive", it's prudent - if it's your psychological state you're concerned about it's something you might need to work through - and I say that because I think rape fantasy is more of a female thing than a male thing - in our fantasies, you all can't wait to jump on us - but it's more complicated for women, the cultural consensus is a very mixed bag, even vanilla wise, ranging from passive acceptance to outright rejection of male sexual aggression, the healthy medium that would be positive w/regards the female libido - just the average vanilla thing, dating mainly, is itself too far for a lot of people, i.e., the whole Sanda Fluke incident, so a rape fantasy for a woman may not be about rape at all, but merely a desire to express ones sexuality freely, without all the heavy moral baggage associated with it. These thoughts however, don't always pop into your head in the moment of course, it's probably mostly hormones and chutzpah, and it's not uncommon for a woman to get second thought about it right in the middle - women often get second thoughts about sex period right in the middle (it is a theoretically much more risky proposition for them in general) when the mind does catch up. Anyway, that might fuck up a scene, yes, but personally, I don't think having thoughts, emotions and feelings of your own makes you less submissive, it makes you human. It's a subject I think about on and off, rape actually comes form the Latin, raptio, from which we also derive rapture, it's basically flirting with the Dionysian limn, as opposed to more controlled Apollonian courtship ritual.
< Message edited by xssve -- 2/15/2013 7:44:07 AM >
_____________________________
Walking nightmare...
|