RE: Collateral murder (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: Collateral murder (2/14/2013 4:20:21 AM)

[:D] [:D] [:D] [:D]




Politesub53 -> RE: Collateral murder (2/14/2013 4:20:28 AM)

No offence taken Butch. I fully get your point.

I`m not sure some of the crap spouted by neocons actually helps others understand American policy though. I also think some people, both inside and outside the US, wonder about a hidden agenda sometimes. If you take Afghanistan, it seems the US is doing its best to ensure its own man stays in power. The rigging of the 2009 election was shameful so it hardly appears to the average Afghan that the west is, as claimed, trying to bring democracy to the country. Even if we were I am unsure it would work as they have a history of using a totally different political system.

I have always supported the invasion of Afghanistan in pursuit of AQ, but they are long gone from the area. I was shocked though to see that money was put aside for the CIA to destabalise the Taliban a week prior to 9/11. Thats an example of what I mean by hidden agendas.




MrRodgers -> RE: Collateral murder (2/14/2013 7:16:41 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WantsOfTheFlesh

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
quote:

ORIGINAL: WantsOfTheFlesh
sure enough but a few ignorant cmers is a pretty small sample to be stretched to a majority 300 mill at least post 9/11.

Which doesnt change the premis that many Americans have the notion "If you are not with us, you are against us" and "New World order" to quote Bush Jnr and Snr respectively. While I agree it isnt the majority, its still a significant proportion.

yep some have that view but def not a majority after the anger over 9/11 settled. think the new world order stuff is post cold war crap bush sr spouted that tin foilers latched onto.

The so-called new world order is a work in progress and could still take a few generations to come to complete fruition. The Sr. Bush's contribution as pres. was cut short not by Clinton but the complete political anomaly known as Ross Perot.

With the appt. of Bush Jr. as pres. the playbook was back on.

Some say Russia, Europe and the US, way in that future, will need to team up against Asia. When the smoke clears we will have one world govt., one currency (did somebody say Aero ?) and simply divide the power of US military into three global areas...all under US command.

Indication of progress will be when the US stops funding Pakistan as both arson and fireman in Islam
Religion will be gone (destroyed if necessary) and the ethnics will not play but fulfill their role...slave or slave owner.

Drones, the killing, the 'war on terror' maneuvering is only the dance on the way to that happy ending.




Zonie63 -> RE: Collateral murder (2/14/2013 10:38:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Good point Zonie but all the time America sees no distinction between one Muslim and another, those in Muslims lands wont see things any differently.


I don't know if this is strictly true. Some Americans may not see any distinction between Muslims, although I think the government has tried to make it painfully clear that they're not going to war on Islam, they're just going against the extremist terrorists. Since America is on good terms with numerous Muslim governments, it seems pretty obviously that America does make distinctions between one Muslim and another.

quote:


Lets not forget when Muslims wanted to build a Mosque in NY, there was a massive outcry regards "Victory Mosques"... Despite the group involved being the polar opposite from the Waahibist movement AQ is influenced by.


There are at least two mosques in my city (probably more, although I can only think of two offhand). There are mosques in just about every city I'm aware of, including NY. I don't think very many Americans have a problem with Muslims building mosques. I think the problem in the case you mention was where in NYC they wanted to build it, very close to the World Trade Center site. That did seem to bother people who lived there locally, but outside of the NYC metro area, I don't think very many people made much of a fuss.

quote:


What an irony that many of those same individuals hailed as "Muhajideen" by the US when they were resisting Russia, are now listed as terrorists.

Many of those armed under Charlie Wilsons involvement have ended up in Baghram, Gitmo or are now dead. The average Afghan must indeed be wondering whats going on with US policy.


Well, when they were anti-Soviet, we considered them friends, using the old "enemy of my enemy" logic. It was an opportunity to stick it to the USSR, so we took it. The Afghans knew this too. They knew that US policy was decidedly anti-Soviet, so they were using us just as we were using them. After the Soviet pullout and the dissolution of the USSR, the Afghans didn't need us anymore. It happens sometimes, where former allies become enemies and former enemies become allies.

Of course, I think we all wonder about what's going on with US policy. I sometimes wonder if even the policymakers know what's going on. It seems to me that the underlying problem here is that the U.S. doesn't really have any kind of coherent foreign policy which is harmonious with our domestic policies and the fundamental principles upon which our country was founded. Our foreign policy seems more reactive and short-sighted than anything else. They don't seem to be planning ahead or coming up with any long-term grand strategies. They just seem to be flying by the seat of their pants, improvising as they go along.

I don't think it's that they don't care or that America has some sort of malice towards the rest of the world (although it could be true for some Americans). At the policy level, I think that a lot of policymakers face situations and global crises where they're just not sure what to do. There's no consistent overriding policy that they can fall back on. It's not like during the Cold War or even earlier when our policies were more neutral and isolationist. At least back in those days, there was greater consistency and clarity. But now, we just make it up as we go along, with the Cold War mindset still remaining prevalent.

I don't think there's any hidden agenda or ulterior motive. There could be, but I think that our government's actions are more the result of stupidity and incompetence. Even setting aside what America may be doing to other countries, our policymakers have been messing things up for America, too.





Zonie63 -> RE: Collateral murder (2/14/2013 10:53:05 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

No offence taken Butch. I fully get your point.

I`m not sure some of the crap spouted by neocons actually helps others understand American policy though. I also think some people, both inside and outside the US, wonder about a hidden agenda sometimes. If you take Afghanistan, it seems the US is doing its best to ensure its own man stays in power. The rigging of the 2009 election was shameful so it hardly appears to the average Afghan that the west is, as claimed, trying to bring democracy to the country. Even if we were I am unsure it would work as they have a history of using a totally different political system.

I have always supported the invasion of Afghanistan in pursuit of AQ, but they are long gone from the area. I was shocked though to see that money was put aside for the CIA to destabalise the Taliban a week prior to 9/11. Thats an example of what I mean by hidden agendas.


I'm not sure about any hidden agendas. It could be, but I think that would imply some sort of centralized conspiracy which seems unlikely (although anything is possible). I think the CIA does what it does because that's what they used to do during the Cold War. It seems more analogous to a supercomputer program that someone forgot to turn off (or upgrade). If there is a hidden agenda, then that would imply that someone competent is actually in charge of this mess.






WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: Collateral murder (2/14/2013 12:51:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
quote:

ORIGINAL: WantsOfTheFlesh
yep some have that view but def not a majority after the anger over 9/11 settled. think the new world order stuff is post cold war crap bush sr spouted that tin foilers latched onto.

The so-called new world order is a work in progress and could still take a few generations to come to complete fruition. The Sr. Bush's contribution as pres. was cut short not by Clinton but the complete political anomaly known as Ross Perot.

With the appt. of Bush Jr. as pres. the playbook was back on.

Some say Russia, Europe and the US, way in that future, will need to team up against Asia. When the smoke clears we will have one world govt., one currency (did somebody say Aero ?) and simply divide the power of US military into three global areas...all under US command.

Indication of progress will be when the US stops funding Pakistan as both arson and fireman in Islam
Religion will be gone (destroyed if necessary) and the ethnics will not play but fulfill their role...slave or slave owner.

Drones, the killing, the 'war on terror' maneuvering is only the dance on the way to that happy ending.

sorry that sounds like a whole lotta foiled opinions. there are loadsa conspiracy sites bout nwo but will read up bout it if ya can post up a link to a genuine impartial source.




WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: Collateral murder (2/14/2013 1:05:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
quote:

Lets not forget when Muslims wanted to build a Mosque in NY, there was a massive outcry regards "Victory Mosques"... Despite the group involved being the polar opposite from the Waahibist movement AQ is influenced by.

There are at least two mosques in my city (probably more, although I can only think of two offhand). There are mosques in just about every city I'm aware of, including NY. I don't think very many Americans have a problem with Muslims building mosques. I think the problem in the case you mention was where in NYC they wanted to build it, very close to the World Trade Center site. That did seem to bother people who lived there locally, but outside of the NYC metro area, I don't think very many people made much of a fuss.

yup the issue near ground zero was about sensitivity to those that died. there was no real islamic community for it ta service so the plan was thought to be suspicious. new york has plenty of mosques. no issue bout them plus numbers are growing http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/religion/story/2012-02-29/islamic-worship-growth-us/53298792/1




Tuub -> RE: Collateral murder (2/14/2013 2:53:05 PM)

After the fall of the SU, the US became terrorist nation no.1`

Simple as that, and now the world needs to act on it just like they did with the Nazi's!




kdsub -> RE: Collateral murder (2/14/2013 5:15:23 PM)

Hi sock




Zonie63 -> RE: Collateral murder (2/15/2013 4:35:55 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Tuub

After the fall of the SU, the US became terrorist nation no.1`
Simple as that, and now the world needs to act on it just like they did with the Nazi's!


I don't think we're terrorist nation number 1 (at least not since the 19th century), and the comparison to the Nazis is out of line and totally irrational.

For other Europeans posting here, I should point out that this is the kind of rhetoric which makes Europeans who criticize America look foolish, and this is why some Americans might be inclined to respond vitriolically to such criticisms.

Besides, "the world" didn't act on anything in regards to the Nazis. "The world" just sat around and waited for the Nazis to attack, appeasing them and making deals with them in the years leading up to it.

It might be interesting to see how "the world" might act against America. China has figured out how to deal with America, and they've prospered quite nicely in the process.




Tuub -> RE: Collateral murder (2/15/2013 4:56:39 AM)

And how is that, the US kills thousends of innocent muslims, just like the Nazi's did with Jews... only difference is that the US doesn't has gaschambers... but they've got their drones and guantanamo bay.

US supports terrorism like no other country does so yes it is terrorist nation no.1

The world is also waiting for the US to make its foolish mistake of war... possibly with Iran.






WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: Collateral murder (2/15/2013 5:08:54 AM)

think there was some crazy kid playin' with a donkey on here a while back sayin' the same thang.

Wonder do all eurastans thunk the same? [8|]




Tuub -> RE: Collateral murder (2/15/2013 5:28:02 AM)

Its simply true... facts can be found anywhere;)

Or do you know a countrie wich supports terrorism even more?




Kirata -> RE: Collateral murder (2/15/2013 5:32:46 AM)


~ FR ~

Is it safe to assume that certain posters on this thread are actively engaged in petitioning their governments to cease being accessories to these attacks by sharing intelligence with the U.S.?

K.




MrRodgers -> RE: Collateral murder (2/15/2013 5:50:49 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WantsOfTheFlesh

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
quote:

Lets not forget when Muslims wanted to build a Mosque in NY, there was a massive outcry regards "Victory Mosques"... Despite the group involved being the polar opposite from the Waahibist movement AQ is influenced by.

There are at least two mosques in my city (probably more, although I can only think of two offhand). There are mosques in just about every city I'm aware of, including NY. I don't think very many Americans have a problem with Muslims building mosques. I think the problem in the case you mention was where in NYC they wanted to build it, very close to the World Trade Center site. That did seem to bother people who lived there locally, but outside of the NYC metro area, I don't think very many people made much of a fuss.

yup the issue near ground zero was about sensitivity to those that died. there was no real islamic community for it ta service so the plan was thought to be suspicious. new york has plenty of mosques. no issue bout them plus numbers are growing http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/religion/story/2012-02-29/islamic-worship-growth-us/53298792/1

Anyone can easily understand, there is sort of a visceral reaction to Islam in all of it public presence enjoyed in the US and almost like no other western country...on both levels.

However, for those who question the continued attempt at religious freedom visceral or not...WTC had two mosques destroyed on 9/11. So the location argument should fall on deaf ears.

I wonder just whose decision it was to do that ? All I've seen in America's resistance is graffiti and the like. Resistance to the west on all levels, is all too often, criminal...violent.

What Nazism we see in America is exemplified much more in govt. and the media cowards and lemmings that are convinced and espouse...opposition is traitorous. The concept of loyal opposition is diluted, almost to disappearance.

That leaves a house divided against itself that we are informed...cannot stand. It will just take some time, just as it did in Rome. Just as in Rome, where from its early existence in relative times, offense was, (before 100 AD after 800 years) the best defense...America follows. It just took until WWI...only about 130 years.




MrRodgers -> RE: Collateral murder (2/15/2013 6:06:44 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WantsOfTheFlesh

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
quote:

ORIGINAL: WantsOfTheFlesh
yep some have that view but def not a majority after the anger over 9/11 settled. think the new world order stuff is post cold war crap bush sr spouted that tin foilers latched onto.

The so-called new world order is a work in progress and could still take a few generations to come to complete fruition. The Sr. Bush's contribution as pres. was cut short not by Clinton but the complete political anomaly known as Ross Perot.

With the appt. of Bush Jr. as pres. the playbook was back on.

Some say Russia, Europe and the US, way in that future, will need to team up against Asia. When the smoke clears we will have one world govt., one currency (did somebody say Aero ?) and simply divide the power of US military into three global areas...all under US command.

Indication of progress will be when the US stops funding Pakistan as both arson and fireman in Islam
Religion will be gone (destroyed if necessary) and the ethnics will not play but fulfill their role...slave or slave owner.

Drones, the killing, the 'war on terror' maneuvering is only the dance on the way to that happy ending.

sorry that sounds like a whole lotta foiled opinions. there are loadsa conspiracy sites bout nwo but will read up bout it if ya can post up a link to a genuine impartial source.

But one must understand...NWO is as I say...a work in progress. Thus, there is no specific link or smoking gun. It is a series of events and govt.'s reaction to them and the slow yet steady re-arrangement of political priorities.

Once govt. was to protect rights that were self-evident, inalienable, endowed by our creator. Now govt. has crossed that great Rubicon where now formed to decide for itself the threats and its protagonists in the new 'war on terror' just as in history...create an enemy and convince society it is being attacked.

Govt. so-endowed, and it takes some time for it to sink in...has civil and military Carte Blanche resulting in GITMO and the elimination of Habeas corpus. I don't think we've 'seen' anything yet. Us more chronically challenged will not see that fruition, but the young will spit on our graves for letting our democratic republic...vanish.




MrRodgers -> RE: Collateral murder (2/15/2013 7:11:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

No offence taken Butch. I fully get your point.

I`m not sure some of the crap spouted by neocons actually helps others understand American policy though. I also think some people, both inside and outside the US, wonder about a hidden agenda sometimes. If you take Afghanistan, it seems the US is doing its best to ensure its own man stays in power. The rigging of the 2009 election was shameful so it hardly appears to the average Afghan that the west is, as claimed, trying to bring democracy to the country. Even if we were I am unsure it would work as they have a history of using a totally different political system.

I have always supported the invasion of Afghanistan in pursuit of AQ, but they are long gone from the area. I was shocked though to see that money was put aside for the CIA to destabalise the Taliban a week prior to 9/11. Thats an example of what I mean by hidden agendas.


I'm not sure about any hidden agendas. It could be, but I think that would imply some sort of centralized conspiracy which seems unlikely (although anything is possible). I think the CIA does what it does because that's what they used to do during the Cold War. It seems more analogous to a supercomputer program that someone forgot to turn off (or upgrade). If there is a hidden agenda, then that would imply that someone competent is actually in charge of this mess.

A little refesher course. Al-Q... was never 'based' in Afghan. And you must know this.....

The Taliban however, was. Look kinkroids, OBL wanted to 'hit' the US. The Taliban did NOT !! The Taliban wanted bring down Islamic govts. in bed with the west.

OBL asked them if he could recruit from its members. The Taliban needing his money...agreed. OBL got 2. That's right cybersluts, TWO men is all OBL was able to recruit. That was the re-birth of what ?

Al-Quada...believe it or not, the term Al-Quada was brought out of mothballs by the CIA to give the world or 'put a face' on our attackers.

The real story: Here

An 'agency' created before history and brought back straight out of the CIA disinformation playbook. Got it ?

"Before Sept 11, 2001, you could hardly find a mention of Al-Qaeda in the US Media. But, immediately after the dramatic attacks both the electronic and print Media began to speak of this hitherto almost unknown entity with such deep knowledge and understanding as if their reporters had been tracking and covering it for years. A classic example of this publicity was the “Special Report” in Time, Nov 12, 2001, that was spread over more than two-thirds of the magazine, whose blazing cover title was, “INSIDE THE AL-QAEDA—Bin Laden’s Web of Terror.”

However:

"The report was mum on how Al-Qaeda had so smoothly overcome all the insurmountable odds and so utterly disabled the US national security agencies and authorities, and had hijacked four American airliners and smashed three of them into most high profile buildings in broad daylight. It gave no explanation how Time had gathered such encyclopedic knowledge of Al-Qaeda so soon after 9/11 ? The report was silent on many publicly known facts. It hid the fact that it was CIA that had picked up Osama and initiated him (through the Saudi Intelligence) into the anti-Soviet Afghan Jihad."


"Al-Qaeda had to be shown as having all the power and resources for committing the most terrible acts at the global level. Otherwise, how could it be a big and dreadful enough threat to the World or a worthy enough combatant for the world’s superpower to battle with?

The real mischief is, Al-Qaeda can actually be invested with the alleged great capabilities, because it is a Wing of Mossad! The vast capabilities attributed to Al-Qaeda are those of Mossad, which has worldwide tentacles and can deploy biological, chemical and nuclear weapons. Let the world’s masses, more so the Muslims, and among them especially the religious, comprehend this frightful reality."

"Al-Qaeda is Jewish Agency’s Child

The terror gangs that came to be known as Al-Qaeda were formed in the early 1930s by the Jewish Agency (JA) for a dreadful purpose. Established in 1929 in Jerusalem as an arm of WZO, the JA was to function as a ‘government-in- being’ for the future Zionist state. One of its tasks was to expel the Palestinians from Palestine and to compel the large numbers of Jews living in and around the Middle East to immigrate to Palestine to increase its Jewish population."


Americans are figuratively...lemmings being led as the power proxy for Israel and the world-wide banking/trading cartel..




BamaD -> RE: Collateral murder (2/15/2013 9:55:33 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

No offence taken Butch. I fully get your point.

I`m not sure some of the crap spouted by neocons actually helps others understand American policy though. I also think some people, both inside and outside the US, wonder about a hidden agenda sometimes. If you take Afghanistan, it seems the US is doing its best to ensure its own man stays in power. The rigging of the 2009 election was shameful so it hardly appears to the average Afghan that the west is, as claimed, trying to bring democracy to the country. Even if we were I am unsure it would work as they have a history of using a totally different political system.

I have always supported the invasion of Afghanistan in pursuit of AQ, but they are long gone from the area. I was shocked though to see that money was put aside for the CIA to destabalise the Taliban a week prior to 9/11. Thats an example of what I mean by hidden agendas.


I'm not sure about any hidden agendas. It could be, but I think that would imply some sort of centralized conspiracy which seems unlikely (although anything is possible). I think the CIA does what it does because that's what they used to do during the Cold War. It seems more analogous to a supercomputer program that someone forgot to turn off (or upgrade). If there is a hidden agenda, then that would imply that someone competent is actually in charge of this mess.

A little refesher course. Al-Q... was never 'based' in Afghan. And you must know this.....

The Taliban however, was. Look kinkroids, OBL wanted to 'hit' the US. The Taliban did NOT !! The Taliban wanted bring down Islamic govts. in bed with the west.

OBL asked them if he could recruit from its members. The Taliban needing his money...agreed. OBL got 2. That's right cybersluts, TWO men is all OBL was able to recruit. That was the re-birth of what ?

Al-Quada...believe it or not, the term Al-Quada was brought out of mothballs by the CIA to give the world or 'put a face' on our attackers.

The real story: Here

An 'agency' created before history and brought back straight out of the CIA disinformation playbook. Got it ?

"Before Sept 11, 2001, you could hardly find a mention of Al-Qaeda in the US Media. But, immediately after the dramatic attacks both the electronic and print Media began to speak of this hitherto almost unknown entity with such deep knowledge and understanding as if their reporters had been tracking and covering it for years. A classic example of this publicity was the “Special Report” in Time, Nov 12, 2001, that was spread over more than two-thirds of the magazine, whose blazing cover title was, “INSIDE THE AL-QAEDA—Bin Laden’s Web of Terror.”

However:

"The report was mum on how Al-Qaeda had so smoothly overcome all the insurmountable odds and so utterly disabled the US national security agencies and authorities, and had hijacked four American airliners and smashed three of them into most high profile buildings in broad daylight. It gave no explanation how Time had gathered such encyclopedic knowledge of Al-Qaeda so soon after 9/11 ? The report was silent on many publicly known facts. It hid the fact that it was CIA that had picked up Osama and initiated him (through the Saudi Intelligence) into the anti-Soviet Afghan Jihad."


"Al-Qaeda had to be shown as having all the power and resources for committing the most terrible acts at the global level. Otherwise, how could it be a big and dreadful enough threat to the World or a worthy enough combatant for the world’s superpower to battle with?

The real mischief is, Al-Qaeda can actually be invested with the alleged great capabilities, because it is a Wing of Mossad! The vast capabilities attributed to Al-Qaeda are those of Mossad, which has worldwide tentacles and can deploy biological, chemical and nuclear weapons. Let the world’s masses, more so the Muslims, and among them especially the religious, comprehend this frightful reality."

"Al-Qaeda is Jewish Agency’s Child

The terror gangs that came to be known as Al-Qaeda were formed in the early 1930s by the Jewish Agency (JA) for a dreadful purpose. Established in 1929 in Jerusalem as an arm of WZO, the JA was to function as a ‘government-in- being’ for the future Zionist state. One of its tasks was to expel the Palestinians from Palestine and to compel the large numbers of Jews living in and around the Middle East to immigrate to Palestine to increase its Jewish population."


Americans are figuratively...lemmings being led as the power proxy for Israel and the world-wide banking/trading cartel..

I don't remember if you were in that thread but you don't believe in the holocost do you?




WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: Collateral murder (2/15/2013 10:11:10 AM)

LOL look rogers I asked ya to quote an impartial source bout NWO. all ya did was quote a blog that carries articles like "JEWISH PERSECUTION: TOOL of the International Zionists’ Plan for World Dominion – Part One, Section Four", holocaust denial stuff & loadsa ZOG/israel running the US crap. do ya also read "Synagogues of Satan" on their blogroll? [8|]




WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: Collateral murder (2/15/2013 10:31:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
But one must understand...NWO is as I say...a work in progress. Thus, there is no specific link or smoking gun. It is a series of events and govt.'s reaction to them and the slow yet steady re-arrangement of political priorities.

Once govt. was to protect rights that were self-evident, inalienable, endowed by our creator. Now govt. has crossed that great Rubicon where now formed to decide for itself the threats and its protagonists in the new 'war on terror' just as in history...create an enemy and convince society it is being attacked.

Govt. so-endowed, and it takes some time for it to sink in...has civil and military Carte Blanche resulting in GITMO and the elimination of Habeas corpus. I don't think we've 'seen' anything yet. Us more chronically challenged will not see that fruition, but the young will spit on our graves for letting our democratic republic...vanish.

sorry man no cigar. if there was major political shifts ta suggest some sorta nwo scenario then least a few impartial sources would be discussin' it. not just fucked up foil blogs. i like ta hear different theories coz sometimes there may be some truth in them but the skepticism factor goes through the roof when the old paulite reliables are shoveling that shit.




Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875