TricklessMagic
Posts: 248
Joined: 9/14/2009
Status: offline
|
Our handout-for-nothing (welfare) system is broken. People who have legitimate need are often overlooked (folks with cancer who can't get SSDI or food stamps) in favor of those who pop out bastards whose futures are made up of only filling prisons or popping out more bastards. Thankfully our welfare system is so out-of-control and ineffective I never have to make a charitable donation ever again, to do so would only encourage the problems this country is already suffering. Now do I help those folks who are suffering from cancer, who have families, who prior to suffering cancer were hardworking productive people? Yes. But that's not charity so much as helping your fellow man/woman get back on their feet so they can take care of their family and not become a burden on the system. Do I do some pro bono representation to help women get child support or get injunctions against violence? Yes but again that goes back to helping to keep people from becoming a burden on the system.
Those whom are too old, sick, young, or mentally impaired to work I believe are entitled to some degree of welfare but that welfare should be narrowly tailored to government cheese, government meat, government milk, government produce, government OJ so as to meet basic nutrition needs, basic shelter, and basic medical needs (I'm not a doctor so I can't say what that is). We need to make it a crime to have children you can't afford to feed and clothe, and to not hand them over to the government to possibly be raised by superior people (that does not mean white people, just folks who make more money and have done something with their lives). For those women whom have more than two children, they shouldn't receive welfare for any more children than two children unless they submit themselves to sterilization (give them the choice). Fathers who sire more than two children they cannot afford should be required to engage in similar options (can't afford your kids, you get a vasectomy). Let those receiving welfare make up to one thousand dollars a month, any dollar earned over that per month while receiving welfare is forfeit to the government while receiving welfare. As long as their shelter, food, and health needs are met they won't legitimately need much else that $1,000 can't meet. Require those receiving welfare, who are physically fit to work and are older than 18 (being out of high school), to donate thirty hours a week of work to public service and construction projects leaving them with at least another thirty hours a week to work for that $1,000 a month. Public service and construction can be harvesting crops, tearing down dilapidated buildings, mine gold (we need a larger gold reserve anyways), build green energy producing facilities, build crop producing green energy structures in highly urban environments, urban improvement projects such as graffiti removal and unarmed neighborhood patrolling in force, work for companies that can hire them to perform unskilled labor (like Ford, GE, etc. etc. help break unions).
Basically get some return on the investment.
We need to make voluntary sterilization free to the public to help combat poverty.
We won't do any of that though. Oh well, I'll use the money I would have donated pre-Sandy Hook to keep buying guns and ammo like I did at Christmas time (that $1,000 went quick to guns and ammo).
|
RE: Welfare vs Charity - 
Profile
.gif){kind=avatar}
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread