Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: treason?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: treason? Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: treason? - 3/3/2013 9:14:13 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

If Hitler himself is reincarnated as president then he must be stopped by whatever means available


All for it as long as the means to stop him used do not kill innocents,...what’s the matter with you...surely you are not that radical you cannot see the hypocrisy in his actions. Do you need to become a Hitler to stop one?

Lets step back and review the results of his actions. Did they change the view of the vast majority of Americans?... Did they alter the direction of the war?...Did they expose a Hitler in America?...Hell did the majority of Americans find any information revealed damning of American policy?

NO…he was wrong on all counts and only aided a real enemy to kill more Americans and broke his oath of enlistment.

Butch

< Message edited by kdsub -- 3/3/2013 9:41:21 PM >


_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to JeffBC)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: treason? - 3/3/2013 9:25:41 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
There is no Hitler…what crap… there is no hidden ruling class…what crap…there is no secret military agenda…what crap. There is only a country and citizen military trying to find ways to fight this unconventional war and making mistakes along the way.

I am all for pointing out the mistakes and I realize, by human nature, they are often hidden and whistle blowers are necessary. But the changes need to be made politically not by giving information to the enemy that allows them to kill our sons and daughters.

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: treason? - 3/3/2013 11:13:10 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
How can anyone who puts innocents in danger be a hero?

You really can't come up with an answer to that question. OK here... I'll give you the breadcrumbs.

Start with the assumption that the US is doing some bad, bad things in the world... including to it's own citizens.
In point of fact, go with the idea that the US is per-Nazi germany... poised on the cusp.
Now imagine someone saying "I need to expose this at ANY cost."

Granted, I know you don't agree with the starting premise. But if you did would the rest of the reasoning make sense to you then?


I find this argument "Manning put innocents in danger" shallow and trivial.

To best of my knowledge, there isn't a single documented case of any one, anywhere suffering hurt or injury because of Manning's actions (except Manning himself, who has been incarcerated under conditions that arguably amount to torture while awaiting court-martial). OTOH, several thousand Americans and hundreds, if not thousands, of Allied soldiers lost their lives, and many thousands more were severely injured as a result of the invasion of Iraq. Not to mention the hundreds of thousands of completely innocent Iraqi civilians killed or severely injured during the Iraq fisaco .....

As we all know, the invasion of Iraq was initiated on the basis of claims about alleged Iraqi WMDs that turned out to be totally false, and were totally false at the time they were made. With the benefit of hindsight, we can reasonably infer that, had there been a Bradley Manning around to alert the US public to the lies and very slanted "intelligence" (?) that Bush et al fed out to garner support for their insane invasion of Iraq, that entire fiasco might have been averted.

If Manning's prosecution for alleged 'treason' is being justified on the (dubious) basis that he allegedly endangered "innocents", then the very real crimes of Bush Cheney et al deserve immediate prosecution as they not only endangered innocents but actually caused the deaths of tens of thousands of innocents (and indeed all deaths subsequent to the invasion of Iraq.)

Get a bit of perspective people!

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 3/3/2013 11:18:20 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to JeffBC)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: treason? - 3/4/2013 3:00:42 AM   
SadistDave


Posts: 801
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave
History won't give a flying fuck about Bradly Manning.



Very unlikely. At the very least because, according to many, his actions helped to kick off the Arab Spring.


On the other hand, many people didn't give a shit about the Arab Spring when it was happening and care even less about it now. Kind of like the Occupy Movement, it will eventually become a teeny tiny footnote in history. The vast majority of protests that were set off by the Arab Spring changed nothing and therefore no one cares about the fact that the Arab Spring started protests in over 80 countries. It isn't worth wasting the effort to remember the details.

Here's something you can try in about 10 years. Just start asking random strangers about what the Arab Spring or Bradly Manning meant to them. I believe the most common responses your going to get will be "Oh, do you mean that thing in Saudi Arabia?" and "Bradly who?".

-SD-


_____________________________

To whom it may concern: Just because someone is in a position of authority they do not get to make up their own facts. In spite of what some people here (who shall remain nameless) want to claim, someone over the age of 18 is NOT a fucking minor!

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: treason? - 3/4/2013 5:36:03 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave

Here's something you can try in about 10 years. Just start asking random strangers about what the Arab Spring or Bradly Manning meant to them. I believe the most common responses your going to get will be "Oh, do you mean that thing in Saudi Arabia?" and "Bradly who?".



That would only be the case if everyone I were to ask lacked human DNA, Dave.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to SadistDave)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: treason? - 3/4/2013 7:33:02 AM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave
History won't give a flying fuck about Bradly Manning.



Very unlikely. At the very least because, according to many, his actions helped to kick off the Arab Spring.


If PenoforHer is correct in the theory that Manning helped kick of Arab Spring, the the most serious charge Manning Aiding the Enemy would be even hard to prove, if not impossible.
Again Manning is NOT charged with treason. For those of you he want Manning hanged, shot etc, here a bit news, Military policy holds that the Dishonorable Discharge is the worst punishment a soldier can recieve, even the death penalty is regarded a lesser punishment and since the last person that was excuted by the military happened in 1961 you all in for a big disappoint, the crimes those who were excuted committed were violent, like rape and murder.

< Message edited by Nosathro -- 3/4/2013 7:50:35 AM >

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: treason? - 3/4/2013 2:50:25 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Get a bit of perspective people!


You may address me tweak...no need to go through a third party...I don't bite.

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: treason? - 3/4/2013 2:50:58 PM   
egern


Posts: 537
Joined: 1/11/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave
History won't give a flying fuck about Bradly Manning.



Very unlikely. At the very least because, according to many, his actions helped to kick off the Arab Spring.


On the other hand, many people didn't give a shit about the Arab Spring when it was happening and care even less about it now. Kind of like the Occupy Movement, it will eventually become a teeny tiny footnote in history. The vast majority of protests that were set off by the Arab Spring changed nothing and therefore no one cares about the fact that the Arab Spring started protests in over 80 countries. It isn't worth wasting the effort to remember the details.

Here's something you can try in about 10 years. Just start asking random strangers about what the Arab Spring or Bradly Manning meant to them. I believe the most common responses your going to get will be "Oh, do you mean that thing in Saudi Arabia?" and "Bradly who?".

-SD-



Maybe it depends on where you ask.

(in reply to SadistDave)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: treason? - 3/4/2013 4:33:16 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5

It is not for a mixed up kid to decide to betray his oath and deliver classified docs to anyone. I don't care what his reasoning is.



Why do you assume that he is a "mixed up kid"?

(in reply to hlen5)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: treason? - 3/4/2013 4:39:59 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

"Manning admitted sending hundreds of thousands of Iraq and Afghanistan battlefield reports, State Department diplomatic cables, other classified records and two battlefield video clips to WikiLeaks in 2009 and 2010. WikiLeaks posted some of the material, embarrassing the U.S. and its allies.

He said he was disturbed by the conduct of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and the way American troops treated the populace. He said he did not believe the release of the information would harm the U.S."



: http://www.10news.com/news/u-s-world/bradley-manning-pleads-guilty-to-leaking-documents-to-wikileaks02282013#sthash.MuWJ7kFe.dpuf




That`s a bunch of shit.


The guy did a massive document drop with more info than he could have comprehend.


You know this because???

quote:

Our enemies are able to sift,decipher and sort through that info/intel..... comparing it with their`s/other enemy`s,etc. to our detriment.


Who fucking exactly is this "our enemies" you are so afraide will find out that our military commits war crimes?


quote:

With the right analysts,our troops,their positions,methods and tactics can very well be exposed.


You mean "our enemies" are sooooo stupid that they do not already know our positions,methods and tactics?


quote:

All the "abuses" he claimed to have wanted to expose were pretty much all in the news already.


So you are saying that he is being courtmartialed for leaking what everyone already knew?


quote:

And Jesus.......giving him a metal is what bin-laden would do.....



That is what we do for our heros.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: treason? - 3/4/2013 4:42:18 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

In my army training, I was told I following an order that is unlawful is a crime under the UCMJ. I asked the instructer what if I am told to put civilians in a pit and shoot them. The instructer stated it is military policy that you obey all order give to you. If you think it is unlawful, obey and afterwards report it.


Clearly you and I were in different branches of the military.

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: treason? - 3/4/2013 4:46:42 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

FR

Take the treasonous little punk to his trial, then hang him by the neck until he is dead. He had no idea what all he had,



How would you know this? Did you have a vision?


quote:

and all this "higher duty" shit is just a load of crap. There are plenty of people in this world who would embrace Pol Pot, if it meant an opportunity to get a cheap shot in at the US military.


This seems a bit more than a cheap shot...we are talking murder under color of authority.

quote:

Tell you what. We'll let him wear a dress to the gallows, if that will help the handwringers feel better about it, and I won't get too concerned about what specific convictions are read, before they drop him


Why the sexual inuendo? Have you no valid bitches against this guy you have to stoop to hi-school name calling?

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: treason? - 3/4/2013 4:49:13 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave

According to the law, Manning committed an act of treason.


You are mistaken

quote:



Anyone of the opinion that he was a hero is certainly entitled to believe that. It's a fine opinion even if it has no basis in fact. I'm pretty sure that if you rely on history to prove that your opinion is the correct assessment then you will be disappointed. History won't give a flying fuck about Bradly Manning.

-SD-


Only those who don't give a fuck about history will not give a fuck about bradly manning.

(in reply to SadistDave)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: treason? - 3/4/2013 4:50:55 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


Here is something to consider as well

Iva Toguri D'Aquino, who is frequently identified with "Tokyo Rose" convicted 1949. Subsequently pardoned by President Gerald Ford.


Perhaps that is because we now know that she was a spy for the allies.

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: treason? - 3/4/2013 4:57:50 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

But if you did would the rest of the reasoning make sense to you then?


No... there is no excuse in indiscriminately putting my innocent son or daughter in mortal danger

Your son or daughter is not innocent...they are involved in a war of agrandisement they are the aggressor they are not innocent.

quote:

I don't care if Hitler himself was reincarnated as President of the united States there was no excuse for treason and divulging information that put fellow citizens and soldiers, just as patriotic as he, in danger. There was and is a better way.

Butch

If we look at history we find your whining about "a better way" has been the whine of the willfully ignorant for thousands of years.
You seem to be all in favor of murdering innocent non combatants but it is a terrible thing that a u.s. soldier would have to defend themself while invading a soverign nation.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: treason? - 3/4/2013 5:11:45 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Anyone who doesn't believe what Pvt Manning did rises to the level of treason is themselves guilty of treason.

"God damn john jay and god damn anyone who wont god damn john jay."
It would appear that your moronic opinion is not exactly new in amerikan political discourse.

(in reply to RacerJim)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: treason? - 3/4/2013 5:14:00 PM   
wittynamehere


Posts: 759
Joined: 2/5/2010
Status: offline
"Anyone who doesn't believe what Pvt Manning did rises to the level of treason is themselves guilty of treason."
Wow, somebody actually said that, and wasn't kidding?
Yikes.

_____________________________

I almost never return to a thread, so if you saw my post and want me to hear your reply, please message it to me.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: treason? - 3/4/2013 5:47:43 PM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
To best of my knowledge, there isn't a single documented case of any one, anywhere suffering hurt or injury because of Manning's actions (except Manning himself, who has been incarcerated under conditions that arguably amount to torture while awaiting court-martial). OTOH, several thousand Americans and hundreds, if not thousands, of Allied soldiers lost their lives, and many thousands more were severely injured as a result of the invasion of Iraq. Not to mention the hundreds of thousands of completely innocent Iraqi civilians killed or severely injured during the Iraq fiasco .....

As we all know, the invasion of Iraq was initiated on the basis of claims about alleged Iraqi WMDs that turned out to be totally false, and were totally false at the time they were made. With the benefit of hindsight, we can reasonably infer that, had there been a Bradley Manning around to alert the US public to the lies and very slanted "intelligence" (?) that Bush et al fed out to garner support for their insane invasion of Iraq, that entire fiasco might have been averted.

If Manning's prosecution for alleged 'treason' is being justified on the (dubious) basis that he allegedly endangered "innocents", then the very real crimes of Bush Cheney et al deserve immediate prosecution as they not only endangered innocents but actually caused the deaths of tens of thousands of innocents (and indeed all deaths subsequent to the invasion of Iraq.)

Get a bit of perspective people!

I rather suspect that the 'peace initiatives' in Afghanistan and Iraq are far from fiasco's, but in fact are proceeding precisely as planned. These are wars of attrition.

I do seem to recall - though I may be mistaken - that there were people around to alert the US public to the lies and very slanted "intelligence", but that their voices were drowned by many more who pushed that disinformation. These days news and truths are made according to order.

< Message edited by Rule -- 3/4/2013 5:48:03 PM >


_____________________________

"I tend to pay attention when Rule speaks" - Aswad

"You are sweet, kind, and ever so smart, Rule. You ALWAYS stretch my mind and make me think further than I might have on my own" - Duskypearls

Si vis pacem, para bellum.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: treason? - 3/4/2013 5:52:00 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

These are wars of attrition.

The only thing they're attriting is the U.S. economy.

K.

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: treason? - 3/5/2013 12:56:38 AM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


Here is something to consider as well

Iva Toguri D'Aquino, who is frequently identified with "Tokyo Rose" convicted 1949. Subsequently pardoned by President Gerald Ford.


Perhaps that is because we now know that she was a spy for the allies.

Where did you get that idea?

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: treason? Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109