TheHeretic
Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007 From: California, USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML But I wonder how valid the need for a gun in the home for protection given that many more people are killed by those very same guns rather than by intruder guns. The phrasing of that statistic seems carefully worked, Vince. Specifically killed by a gun the intruder brings in. Not, beaten up and robbed in a home invasion. Not raped. Not even killed with a knife the intruder brings, or some item in the household, other than a gun. How much more likely is an old woman to be suffocated with her own pillow, than a pillow brought by the intruder? Getting to the question of the OP, yes, Steve. Guns are tools that make living things dead. For your city dweller, they can work very well on vicious dogs, as well as potentially killing people. They are such effective tools for making living things into dead things, that simply the presence of one can be a powerful deterrent to other humans. Merely the sound of the action on a pump shotgun can be all that is needed to send an intruder back out the way he came in. Crazed pit bulls in the city (sorry, JLF, but they are the "savage" breed du jour), and the snakes in my part of the world lack such sensibility. I don't hunt. My idea of sport shooting is taking the 12 gauge to an old TV set out in the desert. Now I can just use a shovel for the snakes (and do, more often than not), or I can physically defend my home with size and strength, righteous rage, and the bottom half of a pool cue, but both are riskier than having the right tool for the job.
_____________________________
If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced. That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.
|