Zonie63 -> RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism (3/7/2013 10:37:42 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote:
ORIGINAL: Zonie63 quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML And how is yours a cogent answer to my statement? An armed rebellion against the Nation forfeits citizenship. I think they're just against the government, not the nation as a whole. Wasn't it Talleyrand who said that "treason is only a matter of dates"? Is a nation not defined by its government? Ideally, that would be the case, but in practice, not always. quote:
To take up arms against your government, are you not also taking up arms against the nation? It would depend on whether you define "the nation" as being just the government (or just a single political party/faction) - or the people as a whole. quote:
Our founding fathers knew they were committing treason against England when they took up arms. What would be different about a 'patriot group' taking up arms today? Sure, they knew the risks they were taking and the consequences of getting caught, but the founding fathers also considered that America was a separate nation by that point. So, they weren't taking up arms against their "nation," since their nation was no longer England. "Nation" can be defined and interpreted in different ways. I've heard some Europeans tell me that America is not really a nation at all, not like European nations are. I don't agree with that view, but I suppose it depends on how one perceives and defines the concept. My only point was that armed rebellion against the government is just that - armed rebellion against the government. It's not against "the nation," since that would imply the people as a whole. Other than that, these aforementioned groups may be criminals, terrorists, insurrectionists (if/when they ever do anything), but I don't think their nationality would suddenly change, even under those circumstances. They'd still be Americans.
|
|
|
|