Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control Over Women in the USA


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control Over Women in the USA Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control O... - 3/12/2013 6:22:54 PM   
breagha


Posts: 380
Joined: 7/29/2012
Status: offline 		from what i gather from the links she attempted suicide 8 days before a c section. was the c section because of the suicide attempt? she was at 33 weeks. her daughter lived for 4 days.

i would be interested in finding something about why the c section was performed. as well as if there were complications because the baby was born 6 weeks early. of course the rat poison could ( and probably did in some way ) have done damage to the unborn baby but it seems to me that the damage done would have caused her to die in the womb as opposed to four days after she was born.

i'm very curious about finding further facts to many aspects of this story. my search begins...

ETA:
quote:

She was hospitalized and doctors detected little wrong with the fetus' health for the first few days.


i'm still looking to see if sometime withing that 8 day window they did detect something wrong...

< Message edited by breagha -- 3/12/2013 6:39:13 PM >

_____________________________

"Consumed with memories that preceded today; given a chance to bereave life that's slipping away"

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control O... - 3/12/2013 7:47:04 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		from what i gather from the links she attempted suicide 8 days before a c section. was the c section because of the suicide attempt? she was at 33 weeks. her daughter lived for 4 days.

Depending on how much she consumed, it could take that long before problems began. She ate the poison, not drank it, which means it takes longer to absorb, then it has to go through her system, into the fetus. They would also be waiting to give the meds to help mature the lungs time to work.

The baby died from cerebral hemorrhaging. Which is what anti-coagulant rat poisoning causes.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to breagha)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control O... - 3/12/2013 8:22:37 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline 		nice way to blame her for a medical error.

Had they left it alone and fed her coagulants waited 6 weeks the baby would have have been fine.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control O... - 3/12/2013 9:51:31 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		LOL

Do me a favor, when you get some medical knowledge to understand even half of the mistakes you just made in your one post, come back and let me know. Ok?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control O... - 3/12/2013 10:10:29 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline 		LMAO

Do us all a favor and when you get some real world EXPERIENCE come back and try again.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control O... - 3/12/2013 10:16:49 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		Darlin.... Labor and Delivery IS my real world experience

Try again

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control O... - 3/13/2013 1:41:08 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline 		"[Women] are no longer allowed to be mentally ill or suffering while pregnant, even though the hormones can render you both and you have no control over that."
http://www.politicususa.com/biology-triggers-state-surveillance-control-humans.html

I am deeply troubled by this extract from the OP. While its precise meaning is unclear, it seems to be saying that mental illness or suffering while pregnant is not a legal defence under the feticide laws. Is this a correct interpretation?

If it is a correct interpretation, my reaction is that it is preposterous. More so as in this case Shuai's suicide attempt tells me that the balance of her mind was clearly unstable. Given the circumstances - Shuai was pregnant and abandoned callously by the father of her child - it is clear that Shuai was not in a position to make balanced and responsible decisions at the time in question.

Could someone please tell me I am mistaken in this interpretation?

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 3/13/2013 1:44:29 AM >

_____________________________



(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control O... - 3/13/2013 1:50:44 AM   
LillyBoPeep


Posts: 6873
Joined: 12/29/2010
Status: offline 		http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/24/new-mexico-abortion-bill_n_2541894.html
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/01/24/new-mexico-abortion-evidence-tampering/1862767/

here are a couple of articles with regards to the "fetus as evidence of crime" stuff. it's a real thing, from new mexico.

_____________________________

Midwestern Girl

"Obey your Master." Metallica


(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control O... - 3/13/2013 2:32:30 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
"[Women] are no longer allowed to be mentally ill or suffering while pregnant, even though the hormones can render you both and you have no control over that."
http://www.politicususa.com/biology-triggers-state-surveillance-control-humans.html
I am deeply troubled by this extract from the OP. While its precise meaning is unclear, it seems to be saying that mental illness or suffering while pregnant is not a legal defence under the feticide laws. Is this a correct interpretation?
If it is a correct interpretation, my reaction is that it is preposterous. More so as in this case Shuai's suicide attempt tells me that the balance of her mind was clearly unstable. Given the circumstances - Shuai was pregnant and abandoned callously by the father of her child - it is clear that Shuai was not in a position to make balanced and responsible decisions at the time in question.
Could someone please tell me I am mistaken in this interpretation?


Hell, she could be in for an awful lot of therapy regardless of the outcome of her trial.

But, there was no proof offered by the author, and there were an awful lot of opinions in the article. She brought up South Carolina being one of the first to pass fetal safety laws but only having charged one man while arrested over 300 women. Now, that's incredulous on first blush, but there is no link, and no proof that the 300+ women weren't guilty and no mention of the outcome of the SC guy's charges.

Further:
    quote:

    The personhood police don’t care if a man kills a preborn while violently attacking the female carrier, but if a woman causes harm by accident, they lock her up. Any questions about intent? You are a uterus, and it sucks to be you in America.


Scott Peterson, anyone?

If the opinions presented by the author are true, it is an abuse of the law. But, I think the truth lies somewhere between what she has presented and reality.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control O... - 3/13/2013 5:40:17 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

She was trying to kill herself, not the kid, tazzy.

Well if she thought the kid would be okay, there's a fucking Darwin award in her future.

K.

It's unlikely she gave a flying fuck about the kid one way or the other. That's as much of a stretch as tazzy's point.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control O... - 3/13/2013 6:24:51 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline 		Thanks for the links LillyBoPeep.

This legislation is grotesque:
Here's what H.B. 206 says:

"A. Tampering with evidence consists of destroying, changing, hiding, placing or fabricating any physical evidence with intent to prevent the apprehension, prosecution or conviction of any person or to throw suspicion of the commission of a crime upon another.
B. Tampering with evidence shall include procuring or facilitating an abortion, or compelling or coercing another to obtain an abortion, of a fetus that is the result of criminal sexual penetration or incest with the intent to destroy evidence of the crime."
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/01/24/new-mexico-abortion-evidence-tampering/1862767/

So having an abortion after being raped or subjected to incest would now count as "tampering with evidence" - a criminal offence !!!

Is there no depth too low for these lunatics ?


_____________________________



(in reply to LillyBoPeep)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control O... - 3/13/2013 6:27:30 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

thats why she was charged with fetuside...not infanticide
it hadnt been born UNTIL she was cut open when she tried to "kill herself"


Which doesn't change the fact that it wasn't a fetus that died.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control O... - 3/13/2013 6:29:35 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		apparently it is in the eyes of the law
thats why she was charged with fetuscide...not infanticide

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control O... - 3/13/2013 7:10:38 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
Thanks for the links LillyBoPeep.
This legislation is grotesque:
Here's what H.B. 206 says:
"A. Tampering with evidence consists of destroying, changing, hiding, placing or fabricating any physical evidence with intent to prevent the apprehension, prosecution or conviction of any person or to throw suspicion of the commission of a crime upon another.
B. Tampering with evidence shall include procuring or facilitating an abortion, or compelling or coercing another to obtain an abortion, of a fetus that is the result of criminal sexual penetration or incest with the intent to destroy evidence of the crime."
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/01/24/new-mexico-abortion-evidence-tampering/1862767/
So having an abortion after being raped or subjected to incest would now count as "tampering with evidence" - a criminal offence !!!
Is there no depth too low for these lunatics ?


A. Stipulates what actions are considered "tampering" when done "with intent to prevent the apprehension, prosecution or conviction of any person or to throw suspicion of the commission of a crime upon another." B includes "ith the intent to destroy evidence of the crime." The intent behind the action is required in determining the applicability of the definition.

Could it be abused and used to arrest women getting abortions from rape/incest? Yes, it could. Would it stand up in a court of law? I'm going to guess that it wouldn't, since the intent isn't there and Prosecution would have to prove that it was.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control O... - 3/13/2013 7:11:33 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

apparently it is in the eyes of the law
thats why she was charged with fetuscide...not infanticide


I am not familiar with the legal aspects of why they charged her with that. Perhaps because it was a fetus when she took the poison. But that still doesn't change the fact that it wasn't a fetus that died, it was a newborn.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control O... - 3/13/2013 7:12:13 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		The language isnt murky, it is crystal clear that is the intent.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control O... - 3/13/2013 7:14:56 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
apparently it is in the eyes of the law
thats why she was charged with fetuscide...not infanticide


I'm going to guess it wasn't considered "infanticide" because the actions occurred before the infant was born. Thus, it was still a fetus. That it died after it was birthed wouldn't necessarily change that, unless there were actions taken post-birth.

If a person commits a crime when he/she is a minor and doesn't go to trial until after becoming an "adult," the person isn't charged as an adult since the crime was committed while the person was a minor (individual cases may vary and depend on the specifics of the situation).


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control O... - 3/13/2013 7:17:53 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
The language isnt murky, it is crystal clear that is the intent.


Which intent? The intent of the law, or the intent of the action that is being considered tampering?


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control O... - 3/13/2013 7:22:40 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		Both, you get raped you cant abort, its evidence tampering.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control O... - 3/13/2013 7:28:35 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
IF the experts could say the rat poisoning killed the child, then I would say... hang her.

But, from what I have read, they cannot determine cause.

She was trying to kill herself, not the kid, tazzy. What sort of ridiculous stretch is that?
For heaven's sake, if she was just trying to get shot of the pregnancy, gin's a lot less likely to cause her harm than rat poison.


Moon, problem is that at 8 months pregnant, she was well aware of the child inside of her. And I simply cannot condone someone ending that life because they wanted to end their own.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Pregnancy Triggers State Surveillance and Control Over Women in the USA Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109