Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy become criminal?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy become criminal? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
[Poll]

At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy become criminal?


When you merely think about the fantasy?
  16% (11)
When you do any act in favor of the fantasy?
  33% (23)
When you actually perform the fantasy?
  50% (34)


Total Votes : 68


(last vote on : 4/6/2013 3:17:30 PM)
(Poll will run till: -- )
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy be... - 3/12/2013 10:34:48 PM   
KrazyJester


Posts: 34
Joined: 7/25/2011
Status: offline
I stated that several times but it seemed to be overlooked by many.

< Message edited by KrazyJester -- 3/12/2013 10:36:13 PM >

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy be... - 3/12/2013 10:59:27 PM   
KrazyJester


Posts: 34
Joined: 7/25/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Darkfeather

Well, it seems that all of you know his mindset more than he did himself. So of course, join in with all the rest of those who vilified him, good lord. You know, it is a sad day when someone can with a straight face can say it is fine to convict a person purely on intent. Who on this planet can say with absolute honesty that they have never walked into a bank and thought, wow if only... Or jokingly said to a friend, I wish Bill was dead. Think back far enough and very few people in the span of their lifetimes can not string together what, capability, opportunity, and intent? Its all in how you present it isn't it. Intent is an easy thing to show because everyone has it at one time or another. And yes, I am of the opinion that you wait for guilt instead of convicting an innocent, even if it were directed at a member of my own family. Maybe because I have been on the receiving end of such accusations beforehand, that I can sympathize with someone who is tried and convicted without even doing said crime. For example, does a shady character, hovering around my 100k car, constitute a crime? No. does a shady character, looking in my said car's windows late at night constitute a crime? Hell no. But those here screaming for poor Gilberto's blood would have the person's head on a pike. Me, I would yes, wait until he actually, I don't know, committed a crime, until I said he was a criminal. Why, because I have been in that situation before, and wow, guess what, I was just looking for a stupid key that fell under the car, but wow, did the cop that came up on me have a pleasant attitude? To him, I was a black man standing next to a sports-car at night, you do the math...


So your defending a guys actions of almost committing murder because you where wrongfully profiled against by a bigot police officer? When you could easily justify your actions to a competent group of individuals. Where in his case involves threat or serious bodily harm to another person...... your losing me here in terms of logic.

(in reply to Darkfeather)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy be... - 3/12/2013 10:59:50 PM   
MalcolmNathaniel


Posts: 1394
Joined: 9/20/2010
Status: offline
Darkfeather, you might want to seriously consider a refresher course in civics and law.

You can't be convicted on suspicion. You most certainly can be convicted of intent to commit a crime. In every country, in every time period in history. Especially when it involves conspiracy to commit said acts.

(in reply to Darkfeather)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy be... - 3/12/2013 11:11:22 PM   
JustDragonflies


Posts: 50
Joined: 3/30/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Darkfeather

You know, it is a sad day when someone can with a straight face can say it is fine to convict a person purely on intent. Who on this planet can say with absolute honesty that they have never walked into a bank and thought, wow if only... Or jokingly said to a friend, I wish Bill was dead. Think back far enough and very few people in the span of their lifetimes can not string together what, capability, opportunity, and intent? Its all in how you present it isn't it. Intent is an easy thing to show because everyone has it at one time or another.

For example, does a shady character, hovering around my 100k car, constitute a crime? No. does a shady character, looking in my said car's windows late at night constitute a crime? Hell no. But those here screaming for poor Gilberto's blood would have the person's head on a pike. Me, I would yes, wait until he actually, I don't know, committed a crime, until I said he was a criminal. Why, because I have been in that situation before, and wow, guess what, I was just looking for a stupid key that fell under the car, but wow, did the cop that came up on me have a pleasant attitude? To him, I was a black man standing next to a sports-car at night, you do the math...


I think you might have a fundamental philosophical problem with conspiracy being against the law, since it doesn't require the action to have been conducted, intentionally or not. But the bottom line is that, as was explained to you and the thread readers by the helpful lawyer on page 1, to do the things he did, whether he would have actually gone through with it in the end IS in fact a crime.

Also, I'd like to point out that legally, a joke (about wishing someone dead) is not "intent". Thinking to one's self "Hmm. I'd like to be rich and have all the money in this bank. I wonder how hard it would be to rob it?" doesn't mean intent, and it certainly doesn't meet the requirement which was pointed out to the readers a few times, again on page 1, I believe, about taking action to further the intent. So even intent alone doesn't appear to be enough, you have to take action.

So. If I said jokingly that I wish that Bill was dead. That'd be one thing. If I said it seriously, that's another. It becomes more illegal the more actions I take to make Bill dead. When I have figured out the steps I'd need to take for Bill to die, it's getting perverse. But when I go out and stalk Bill's address, meet Bill to assess his potential for being killed and then talk about killing Bill with my partner.... I believe that I'd be meeting the legal requirements to be charged with conspiring to kill Bill, because I obviously am doing that. I may never actually kill him, but in this scenario, I've conspired to do so. And that's illegal, whether you agree with it or not. And if I get caught doing it... I'll be charged just like this guy.

And none of that has anything to do with racial profiling, I might add. If the car scenario occurred, regardless of race, if a clean cut looking off duty cop was found, say... with a bag to put stolen items in, a tool to break in and had internet searches on their computer about how to break into cars: then again, they're meeting those criteria of having furthered their ideas along to conspire to commit the crime, again... whether they commit the break-in, in the end is different crime entirely. If they're caught standing there with all that evidence, they'd have broken some laws already for just taking those actions alone.


To answer the OP's question, I think the point that someone is starting to take action toward their fantasy, if it's illegal, is when it becomes criminal. I read some of the testimony that indicated that he told others that it was all just a joke and he'd never actually go through with such deeds. But when you start to look people up and target individuals, whether they're ignorant of it or not, you're beginning to break some laws,and if you're caught may be punished for it. And probably that's the way it ought to be. It might have taken him 10 days or years to work up to taking further action, or he might never have done so. But, to me, it's important for people to understand that planning, and taking action to harm others isn't appropriate conduct in our society and may be punishable. Be that as it may, I believe that the punishment should fit the actual crime that did take place and if I had any authority over sentencing him it wouldn't be life imprisonment. It would be more like a couple years of house arrest, a decade of counseling and a lifetime of monitoring (because I doubt even a decade of counseling could prevent someone from wanting to kill and eat people if that's something that they're already deeply sexually attached to).




(in reply to Darkfeather)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy be... - 3/12/2013 11:40:24 PM   
Pyramus


Posts: 397
Joined: 5/14/2010
Status: offline
I've had slave auction fantasies since I was a kid; I have ball gags, blindfolds, and fur-lined leather cuffs; and, I've just now discussed this with all my friends on the net (you).

EDIT: I've even gone so far as to pick out the very women (see below).


Am I guilty yet?

< Message edited by Pyramus -- 3/12/2013 11:41:38 PM >

(in reply to JustDragonflies)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy be... - 3/12/2013 11:53:40 PM   
JustDragonflies


Posts: 50
Joined: 3/30/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pyramus

Am I guilty yet?


Did you locate them and start stalking them and fully plan out their capture?

Further, guilty or not... did you get caught and charged? :P

I think, as you're joking, you're guilty of nothing, though.

(in reply to Pyramus)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy be... - 3/13/2013 12:01:05 AM   
Darkfeather


Posts: 1142
Joined: 3/13/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JustDragonflies


quote:

ORIGINAL: Darkfeather

You know, it is a sad day when someone can with a straight face can say it is fine to convict a person purely on intent. Who on this planet can say with absolute honesty that they have never walked into a bank and thought, wow if only... Or jokingly said to a friend, I wish Bill was dead. Think back far enough and very few people in the span of their lifetimes can not string together what, capability, opportunity, and intent? Its all in how you present it isn't it. Intent is an easy thing to show because everyone has it at one time or another.

For example, does a shady character, hovering around my 100k car, constitute a crime? No. does a shady character, looking in my said car's windows late at night constitute a crime? Hell no. But those here screaming for poor Gilberto's blood would have the person's head on a pike. Me, I would yes, wait until he actually, I don't know, committed a crime, until I said he was a criminal. Why, because I have been in that situation before, and wow, guess what, I was just looking for a stupid key that fell under the car, but wow, did the cop that came up on me have a pleasant attitude? To him, I was a black man standing next to a sports-car at night, you do the math...


I think you might have a fundamental philosophical problem with conspiracy being against the law, since it doesn't require the action to have been conducted, intentionally or not. But the bottom line is that, as was explained to you and the thread readers by the helpful lawyer on page 1, to do the things he did, whether he would have actually gone through with it in the end IS in fact a crime.

Also, I'd like to point out that legally, a joke (about wishing someone dead) is not "intent". Thinking to one's self "Hmm. I'd like to be rich and have all the money in this bank. I wonder how hard it would be to rob it?" doesn't mean intent, and it certainly doesn't meet the requirement which was pointed out to the readers a few times, again on page 1, I believe, about taking action to further the intent. So even intent alone doesn't appear to be enough, you have to take action.

So. If I said jokingly that I wish that Bill was dead. That'd be one thing. If I said it seriously, that's another. It becomes more illegal the more actions I take to make Bill dead. When I have figured out the steps I'd need to take for Bill to die, it's getting perverse. But when I go out and stalk Bill's address, meet Bill to assess his potential for being killed and then talk about killing Bill with my partner.... I believe that I'd be meeting the legal requirements to be charged with conspiring to kill Bill, because I obviously am doing that. I may never actually kill him, but in this scenario, I've conspired to do so. And that's illegal, whether you agree with it or not. And if I get caught doing it... I'll be charged just like this guy.

And none of that has anything to do with racial profiling, I might add. If the car scenario occurred, regardless of race, if a clean cut looking off duty cop was found, say... with a bag to put stolen items in, a tool to break in and had internet searches on their computer about how to break into cars: then again, they're meeting those criteria of having furthered their ideas along to conspire to commit the crime, again... whether they commit the break-in, in the end is different crime entirely. If they're caught standing there with all that evidence, they'd have broken some laws already for just taking those actions alone.


To answer the OP's question, I think the point that someone is starting to take action toward their fantasy, if it's illegal, is when it becomes criminal. I read some of the testimony that indicated that he told others that it was all just a joke and he'd never actually go through with such deeds. But when you start to look people up and target individuals, whether they're ignorant of it or not, you're beginning to break some laws,and if you're caught may be punished for it. And probably that's the way it ought to be. It might have taken him 10 days or years to work up to taking further action, or he might never have done so. But, to me, it's important for people to understand that planning, and taking action to harm others isn't appropriate conduct in our society and may be punishable. Be that as it may, I believe that the punishment should fit the actual crime that did take place and if I had any authority over sentencing him it wouldn't be life imprisonment. It would be more like a couple years of house arrest, a decade of counseling and a lifetime of monitoring (because I doubt even a decade of counseling could prevent someone from wanting to kill and eat people if that's something that they're already deeply sexually attached to).






My point is not whether it is legal, but is it right, sheesh. Everyone is more than happy to say conspiracy, intent, etc. But my point is is it right to convict someone purely on intent. And yes my example is just like his. No it was not a bigoted cop. It was just a case of spectators inside the supermarket, who happened to see me near the car in question, mis-judged my INTENT. They believed me to be a car robber, and called the police. The police in turn, came with the notion that I was there to break into the car, and then saw a black man there. They also mis-judged my INTENT. Luckily I present a nice clean cut image, so it cleared up in time, but what if I had my bondage supplies in my car at the time? Rope, ball-gags, crops, etc... What if I had say polaroids of woman I had tied up, strictly with their consent mind you, also in my car at the time? Imagine the shitstorm that would have created with INTENT. I definitely would not be typing this from my house, I can tell you, unless I had gotten a really, really good lawyer. But I seem to be in the minority here, as others seem to be fine with the way things are now

(in reply to JustDragonflies)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy be... - 3/13/2013 12:35:00 AM   
KrazyJester


Posts: 34
Joined: 7/25/2011
Status: offline



[/quote]

My point is not whether it is legal, but is it right, sheesh. Everyone is more than happy to say conspiracy, intent, etc. But my point is is it right to convict someone purely on intent. And yes my example is just like his. No it was not a bigoted cop. It was just a case of spectators inside the supermarket, who happened to see me near the car in question, mis-judged my INTENT. They believed me to be a car robber, and called the police. The police in turn, came with the notion that I was there to break into the car, and then saw a black man there. They also mis-judged my INTENT. Luckily I present a nice clean cut image, so it cleared up in time, but what if I had my bondage supplies in my car at the time? Rope, ball-gags, crops, etc... What if I had say polaroids of woman I had tied up, strictly with their consent mind you, also in my car at the time? Imagine the shitstorm that would have created with INTENT. I definitely would not be typing this from my house, I can tell you, unless I had gotten a really, really good lawyer. But I seem to be in the minority here, as others seem to be fine with the way things are now
[/quote]

He was not convicted Purely on INTENT alone though, he had the capability by going on the federal database and looking up potential victims, he had opportunity by meeting with those potential victims and talking to those individuals, and intent to carry it out through talking with other people and planning with them. As well as trying to receive a bride from one of those people to bring them someone.

As for your situation, your intent was explained away just as you had said. But one persons perception, is an others reality. As far as you having bondage equipment in your car, that says nothing of your intent to do anything its just more physical evidence that can be explained away. With the new mainstream over 50% of people have participated in some form of bondage-ques behavior. In which, I doubt police are excluded from that percentage. And why would they be focusing on that if you just handed them your license and registration stating that the car is yours?

In my thinking it is 100 % right.

(in reply to Darkfeather)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy be... - 3/13/2013 12:43:51 AM   
JustDragonflies


Posts: 50
Joined: 3/30/2012
Status: offline
Darkfeather:

I don't think "right" is so clear cut. In this scenario, it seems right. He was abusing his power and he was starting to take actions. You keep highlighting intent and I keep highlighting actions. He was charged with a crime because his intentions were translating into actions, legal and illegal, in the real world, not in his fantasy world.

Also, if you're unaware, you should know that yes... plenty of BDSM activities are illegal in some places and consent is irrelevant, so yes, if such evidence is found, you could be in trouble depending on who has authority in charging you for crimes and what their motives are.


(in reply to Darkfeather)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy be... - 3/13/2013 1:28:54 AM   
Darkfeather


Posts: 1142
Joined: 3/13/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KrazyJester
My point is not whether it is legal, but is it right, sheesh. Everyone is more than happy to say conspiracy, intent, etc. But my point is is it right to convict someone purely on intent. And yes my example is just like his. No it was not a bigoted cop. It was just a case of spectators inside the supermarket, who happened to see me near the car in question, mis-judged my INTENT. They believed me to be a car robber, and called the police. The police in turn, came with the notion that I was there to break into the car, and then saw a black man there. They also mis-judged my INTENT. Luckily I present a nice clean cut image, so it cleared up in time, but what if I had my bondage supplies in my car at the time? Rope, ball-gags, crops, etc... What if I had say polaroids of woman I had tied up, strictly with their consent mind you, also in my car at the time? Imagine the shitstorm that would have created with INTENT. I definitely would not be typing this from my house, I can tell you, unless I had gotten a really, really good lawyer. But I seem to be in the minority here, as others seem to be fine with the way things are now


He was not convicted Purely on INTENT alone though, he had the capability by going on the federal database and looking up potential victims, he had opportunity by meeting with those potential victims and talking to those individuals, and intent to carry it out through talking with other people and planning with them. As well as trying to receive a bride from one of those people to bring them someone.

As for your situation, your intent was explained away just as you had said. But one persons perception, is an others reality. As far as you having bondage equipment in your car, that says nothing of your intent to do anything its just more physical evidence that can be explained away. With the new mainstream over 50% of people have participated in some form of bondage-ques behavior. In which, I doubt police are excluded from that percentage. And why would they be focusing on that if you just handed them your license and registration stating that the car is yours?

In my thinking it is 100 % right.


And you are clearly missing the point. You know how this whole case came to light? Not because one of his "victims" came crying to the FBI, screaming attempted kidnapping, not because his co-conspirators failed in their attempts... No, his wife found pictures, pictures mind you, on his computer and ran from the house calling the cops. That is how he got caught. Not red handed in the act, no stalking in the back yard of some nubile young female. He got caught with kink, and it exploded from there. So sometimes, you cannot just explain things away. INTENT snowballs. This is human nature, fear begets fear. I guarantee if my local police see a bag of rope and ball-gags, and me a 43 year old black man, they will not smile and say "have a nice day". They will however say "can you please come down to the station for some questions". That is our society, impressions form INTENT. I have lived with it my whole life, and hell if you can convince me that kind of thinking is right, cause it isn't.

< Message edited by Darkfeather -- 3/13/2013 1:32:44 AM >

(in reply to KrazyJester)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy be... - 3/13/2013 1:45:48 AM   
Darkfeather


Posts: 1142
Joined: 3/13/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JustDragonflies

Darkfeather:

I don't think "right" is so clear cut. In this scenario, it seems right. He was abusing his power and he was starting to take actions. You keep highlighting intent and I keep highlighting actions. He was charged with a crime because his intentions were translating into actions, legal and illegal, in the real world, not in his fantasy world.

Also, if you're unaware, you should know that yes... plenty of BDSM activities are illegal in some places and consent is irrelevant, so yes, if such evidence is found, you could be in trouble depending on who has authority in charging you for crimes and what their motives are.




This is definitely a right or wrong scenario. Because did he actually act on his fantasy? No. Did he talk about it, yes. Did he engage in activities with like minded individuals, yes. Did he actually kidnap a female and eat her, no. Did he try to kidnap a female and eat her, no. Example, Mary wants to kill her husband Bill. She IMs a guy Mitch, talking about killing the poor guy. Is that a crime? Sure is, but is that right, no. Why, because she oh I dunno, might never actually go through with it. lets wait... Waiting, Mary plans out the whole thing, telling Mitch when poor Bill will be home, at work, asleep alone, etc. Is that a crime? Hell yes, but is that right? No, again because she might not actually go through with it, again. So gee, lets wait. Now Mary gets into the bank account and pulls 10k, giving it to Mitch. Now that shows she really wants poor Bill dead. Now you can say, she has intent. Lets put this into old Gilberto's situation... If say, he were caught in a beat up buick, with his three internet buddies and a bag full of duct tape, BBQ sauce, and baking tins, I would have no problem with him getting convicted. But that didn't happen. They stopped him long before it did. My point is, the right thing to do was to wait until he did get in that buick with the BBQ sauce, then arrest him, so it was clear as to what his INTENT was, instead of having to guess. Because that is what everyone is doing, guessing, unless we are now mind-readers

(in reply to JustDragonflies)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy be... - 3/13/2013 2:27:45 AM   
KrazyJester


Posts: 34
Joined: 7/25/2011
Status: offline
I get your point but again as stated previously, when that happens whos around to respond? The police that is tailing him? There is not enough man power for the police to be able to tail everyone who they think is going to do wrong, so they put this sort of thing in place to prevent it from happening at the root of the problem. Your absolutely right, fear begets fear. But his wife Feared for her own safety which led to people going further into what he was doing. People fear for their lives which leads them to a not guilty verdict when it comes to killing in self defense.

We can "What if" a situation until we are blue in the face, but that doesn't change to real problem, he took acts toward committing the crime. Even if it wasn't discovered until after his wife went screaming out of the house.

And i cant dis wade you from your opinion of a certain situation. I am stating what I think based on my back round. Changing your opinion of something is like trying to make the pope an atheist, not going to happen, because you have dealt with similar situations like that all your life. Especially when I might be just a kid in your eyes, see what i am saying? Your also right in saying that your local police might have a problem with a ball gag and rope, I forgot to factor in separate state legality issues, yes big oversight on my part. But that also depends on the person and what he has been subjected to.

(in reply to Darkfeather)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy be... - 3/13/2013 2:34:31 AM   
LillyBoPeep


Posts: 6873
Joined: 12/29/2010
Status: offline
I have a hard time feeling any sympathy for him (there's another thread down in politics) - i would consider using a police database to get information on one of his named potential victims as "acting in furtherance." =p but maybe that's why i'm not a lawyer? i dunno.



_____________________________

Midwestern Girl

"Obey your Master." Metallica


(in reply to KrazyJester)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy be... - 3/13/2013 4:03:12 AM   
Darkfeather


Posts: 1142
Joined: 3/13/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KrazyJester

I get your point but again as stated previously, when that happens whos around to respond? The police that is tailing him? There is not enough man power for the police to be able to tail everyone who they think is going to do wrong, so they put this sort of thing in place to prevent it from happening at the root of the problem. Your absolutely right, fear begets fear. But his wife Feared for her own safety which led to people going further into what he was doing. People fear for their lives which leads them to a not guilty verdict when it comes to killing in self defense.

We can "What if" a situation until we are blue in the face, but that doesn't change to real problem, he took acts toward committing the crime. Even if it wasn't discovered until after his wife went screaming out of the house.

And i cant dis wade you from your opinion of a certain situation. I am stating what I think based on my back round. Changing your opinion of something is like trying to make the pope an atheist, not going to happen, because you have dealt with similar situations like that all your life. Especially when I might be just a kid in your eyes, see what i am saying? Your also right in saying that your local police might have a problem with a ball gag and rope, I forgot to factor in separate state legality issues, yes big oversight on my part. But that also depends on the person and what he has been subjected to.


Ok, how about this? When said wife went screaming to the police, instead of locking the poor guy up and charging him with conspiracy, why not put him under surveillance?? No who is around to respond, no not enough man-hours. They are already on the guy. 24/7 police coverage of him so that if and when Gilberto and his cronies get in that buick with knives and rope, they can pull him over red handed caught in the act. I mean its not like they didn't know he wasn't suspect, his wife outright accused him (that little tidbit would be a whole new conversation entirely). To me, there is no "what if" situation there, they could have chosen to sit back and watch the situation play out or jump on it at the outset. They chose the latter.

(in reply to KrazyJester)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy be... - 3/13/2013 4:43:41 AM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
You are denying his actions.
It has been pointed out to you repeatedly what his actual criminal actions were, and how they crossed the line of the statute.
It has been pointed out to you that what he was actually convicted of and what you claim he was prosecuted for are 2 different things.

You can keep pretending they never happened all you want, you aren't going to cause reality to alter to suit your fantasies.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Darkfeather

I am in no way defending the man or his actions. My point is they took out his choice in the matter. They stepped in well before he could decide whether or not he would go through it as you say. Up until they arrested him, he had not committed any real acts, they were all still fantasy. Still talked about, still watched in videos, still mused over in photos. Could this have ultimately been enough for him, we will never know now, because he never had that epiphany. He never came to that turning-point in the road. We are supposed to be a society where until you cross that line, until you take that choice to act like a criminal and not just think like one, you are supposed to be given the benefit of the doubt. He wasn't



_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to Darkfeather)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy be... - 3/13/2013 6:12:47 AM   
muhly22222


Posts: 463
Joined: 3/25/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LillyBoPeep

I have a hard time feeling any sympathy for him (there's another thread down in politics) - i would consider using a police database to get information on one of his named potential victims as "acting in furtherance." =p but maybe that's why i'm not a lawyer? i dunno.




Maybe you should consider it, because you'd be right on the spot about that.

Actually...scratch that, you don't want to go to law school...where happiness goes to die.

Conspiracy as a crime has been around since long before Europeans came to America. It's one of the common-law crimes (although every state in the U.S. has a statutory definition now). This is not some new idea in criminal law.

Darkfeather has said that he only planned, he didn't commit the crime. The short, pithy answer is that, in this case, planning is acting.

Reaching back to my criminal law class, every crime has two basic elements, the actus reus and the mens rea. The mens rea is the mental condition of the perpetrator...did he intend to commit the act? The actus reus is the actual act that a person takes.

In order for conspiracy charges to stick, there are two basic acti rei (I'm not sure that's the appropriate Latin form...don't crucify me for it) that must be shown. First, there must have been some sort of planning engaged in. Here, the planning happened on the internet forums. You can argue about whether that was planning or whether that was fantasizing...the defense did, and they lost. Second, there has to be some sort of overt act taken. Again, that overt act in this case was the stalking of the women, looking them up on police databases.

You can say that he was convicted because of his kink, and not his actions. It's possible, I admit. But unless you were in the jury room, you can't know why they reached the decisions they did. And given your ability to not back down in the face of massive criticism (which is an admirable trait under the right circumstances), I'm pretty comfortable guessing you weren't in that jury room, because otherwise that headline would have said "not guilty." From the new reports (not always a good source), it certainly sounds like the evidence was there to convict him of conspiracy. It also sounds like it was a close case, and the right lawyer may have been able to convince the jury that this was merely fantasizing. The right lawyer may still be able to convince an appellate panel that the prosecution didn't prove that any actual planning had been done.

(in reply to LillyBoPeep)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy be... - 3/13/2013 7:44:30 AM   
Cilicia


Posts: 72
Joined: 1/23/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JustDragonflies
Did you locate them and start stalking them and fully plan out their capture?


This seems, based on all the responses, to be the crux of the legal argument.

(in reply to JustDragonflies)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy be... - 3/13/2013 8:58:56 AM   
pompeii


Posts: 934
Joined: 1/4/2007
From: Silicon Valley, San Jose, California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cilicia
quote:

ORIGINAL: JustDragonflies
Did you locate them and start stalking them and fully plan out their capture?

This seems, based on all the responses, to be the crux of the legal argument.


I think you need an additional element, although I'm not sure.

1. You need to take some kind of action ...
But,
2. You also seem to need friends.

For example, would the guy have been convicted if he did everything BUT solicit accomplices?

(in reply to Cilicia)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy be... - 3/13/2013 9:02:29 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
he still stalked, and made illegal database accesses.  So, of that, I think so.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to pompeii)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy be... - 3/13/2013 9:15:35 AM   
Darkfeather


Posts: 1142
Joined: 3/13/2007
Status: offline
Good lord, I have over and over again said I am not arguing the legality of this case. So please stop trying to contradict my statements on such. In fact, I don't really care if they are legal or not, as I don't really agree with them in the first place. Conspiracy is way to easy to prove, hence why it has made such a comeback in recent years. Prosecutors will time and time again go for conspiracy over something harder to prove, such as eye witness accounts, DNA evidence, etc. Why, because the requirements on evidence, allowable statements, witness testimony, etc., are a lot more forgiving. And yes I can say with absolute certainty that even though I wasn't in the jury room they had been influenced by the prosecutor's evidence. Why, because they were shown pictures of bloody gore from cannibal websites and told they were linked to Gilberto. That kind of thing prejudices a person, you can't help it. Only a monster looks at pictures of blood and guts, so Gilberto must be a monster, hence convict. What gets me is that no one, NO ONE is saying they should have at least waited to catch him in the act... When they get prior knowledge of a bank robbery, do they arrest them? No, they stake out the bank, and catch the guys out front as they try. When they hear about a wife trying to hire a hitman to knock off her old man, do they arrest her? No, they send in an under cover cop to play the scumbag and record her paying him to do the dirty deed. Did they do ANYTHING like that in this case, no. But no one is questioning that. Everyone seems fine that they simply went in on the simple word of his wife, raided and tore apart his computer and other personal property, slapped every petty crime they could on to him then convicted him. Of something he may or may not eventually probably would have done.

(in reply to Cilicia)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: At what point does deviant sexual mental fantasy become criminal? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109