Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Double talk??


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Double talk?? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Double talk?? - 6/26/2006 5:16:53 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo

We've all stood in riot girls shoes at one time or another.  Shes been fooled...duped...whatever word you chose to use. 

I guess Im *below* it.  Because if someone ( spouse/significant other/father of my child) spends years lying to me, Im damn well going to find out what they lied to me about and what scheme they have in mind using *my* personal things....ie....photos emails or whatever else they put on the web, so I can protect myself and my child. 

Ive never been tracked down or beaten.  Im not sure if thats luck, caution, or playing detective. But I'll do whatever it takes (short of something illegal) to protect myself and child.  Again, in an ideal world we wouldnt have to resort to such a thing, but if you feel you're being victimized, well, then sometimes those lines have to be crossed. 

Actually...it IS against the law to go through a person's mail or any of their private belongings without their express permission and if said person chose to bring charges against you, they could.  In the case of mail delivered through the postal system, it is considered a violation of federal law, whether or not the letter has been previously opened.

Note that this is not an attempt to justify the abuser of riotgirl.  I'm sure that there are things he has done that are illegal and that could be her recourse. 

(in reply to marieToo)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Double talk?? - 6/26/2006 6:10:36 PM   
marieToo


Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006
From: Jersey
Status: offline
No two wrongs do not make a right for all you moral nazis ripping apart my post and putting words in my mouth.

bottom line...If I am not safe, my child is not safe.  If I get hurt, my child has no caregiver. 

I do not believe that some moral code of ethics about checking your non-trustworthy husbands email is more important than a child's safety.  And yes...the mothers wellfare IS one in the same as the childs welfare. 

In THIS particular case, given THESE particular circumstances, I would have done the same thing riot girl did.  I stand behind that, no matter how many of you people who have lived the lives of saints lie your asses off about  never having crossed an ethical line in your lives. 


(in reply to mew)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Double talk?? - 6/26/2006 6:24:22 PM   
marieToo


Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006
From: Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kree

ok...it takes more than one clear moment of self respect to leave.  God forgive me for misquoting you.  My point is still the same. 

How beautiful it must be to live in a shiney little perfect world of absolutes.  I suppose you've never questioned anything, anyone, or wondered in which direction to turn.  And I bet you're the first human being who has never had inner conflict, hesitation, or doubt. 

You seem to have found the holy grail.  You have every cut and dried answer to every word ever spoken.  Makes me wonder why you sound so angry all the time.

************************************************************************************ No one needs forgiveness for a misquote, it just changes the way someone said something, thus changing the meaning.  If changing the meaning of a comment helps you with your little diatribe and attack, go for it.

I do not live in a world of absolutes, nor a perfect world, but I do live in a world I choose to live in and it is a delightful world because two people make it that way.  I have questioned many things in my life, but after questioning and making decisions, I have accepted my CHOICES and moved along the path of life.  If I have made a bad decision, I recognize it was MY bad decision and have no need to alert the media that someone fucked me over. 

I might very well be the only person on earth, besides my partner, without inner conflicts etc., because I face situations and resolve them on my own.... ooops there is that self respect (and personal responsibility) bullshit again.  Of course there are indeed people on this earth who DO face situations and DO resolve them.  

Actually, I have ideas about the holy grail.  Ever read "Holy Blood, Holy Grail"? 

You do not know me, but if you did, you would realize that anger has no place in my world.  Anger is a worthless emotional response that saps energy and prevents the resolution of issues.  

Read the posts I have made, and you will find logic... not anger.  If I choose to post something that I feel might make someone think, it isn't about anger, it is about trying to help.  I do grow weary of seeing people respond to problems with empathy and "It will be okay", instead of asking people to actually look at, and face their problems.   

I do not know why you chose to flame me for posting a comment asking someone to look at reality instead of the shadow world of "It will be all right", but understand, I don't play the silly games that I've seen on other threads where people do 100's of one line flames at each other.  It's such a waste of bandwidth, and it gives undeserved credibility to the flamers. 

See my thread called "Hand to Hand Combat".  Or better yet, I'll just quote from it.  "Never argue with a pig.  You'll both get dirty and the pig just loves it.


Are you calling me a pig? 

(in reply to Kree)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Double talk?? - 6/26/2006 6:56:17 PM   
Noah


Posts: 1660
Joined: 7/5/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo

No two wrongs do not make a right for all you moral nazis ripping apart my post and putting words in my mouth.

bottom line...If I am not safe, my child is not safe.  If I get hurt, my child has no caregiver. 

I do not believe that some moral code of ethics about checking your non-trustworthy husbands email is more important than a child's safety.  And yes...the mothers wellfare IS one in the same as the childs welfare. 

In THIS particular case, given THESE particular circumstances, I would have done the same thing riot girl did.  I stand behind that, no matter how many of you people who have lived the lives of saints lie your asses off about  never having crossed an ethical line in your lives. 




Marie.

I'm sorry your child's father is absent from your child's life--whether through death or desertion, illness or incarceration. I'm sorry that there is no one else from among your family or friends who would step in to give care to your child if you became hurt. I expect that your child's extremely precarious situation has contributed to your sensitivity in regard to this thread. I'm sure that a large portion of each of your days is spent in addressing that supremely stressful situation and I wish you all luck with it.

That said, I didn't see anyone here claim never to have crossed ethical lines. Everyone I know who gives a crap about right and wrong has gained knowledge from both sides of the line. Speaking up in favor of recognizing that there is such a thing as doing wrong does not entail any claim of moral superiority, much less perfection.






(in reply to marieToo)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Double talk?? - 6/26/2006 7:19:22 PM   
marieToo


Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006
From: Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Noah


quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo

No two wrongs do not make a right for all you moral nazis ripping apart my post and putting words in my mouth.

bottom line...If I am not safe, my child is not safe.  If I get hurt, my child has no caregiver. 

I do not believe that some moral code of ethics about checking your non-trustworthy husbands email is more important than a child's safety.  And yes...the mothers wellfare IS one in the same as the childs welfare. 

In THIS particular case, given THESE particular circumstances, I would have done the same thing riot girl did.  I stand behind that, no matter how many of you people who have lived the lives of saints lie your asses off about  never having crossed an ethical line in your lives. 




Marie.

I'm sorry your child's father is absent from your child's life--whether through death or desertion, illness or incarceration. I'm sorry that there is no one else from among your family or friends who would step in to give care to your child if you became hurt. I expect that your child's extremely precarious situation has contributed to your sensitivity in regard to this thread. I'm sure that a large portion of each of your days is spent in addressing that supremely stressful situation and I wish you all luck with it.

That said, I didn't see anyone here claim never to have crossed ethical lines. Everyone I know who gives a crap about right and wrong has gained knowledge from both sides of the line. Speaking up in favor of recognizing that there is such a thing as doing wrong does not entail any claim of moral superiority, much less perfection.








Noah:

You have made alot of presumptions about me, my life, my child and my ex.  I have no desire to disqualify your innacurate assumptions.  Im sorry that you would even equate "friends" as a sufficient replacement for a child's mother.  But thats beside the point anyway.

Suffice it to say that my post was written in the context of  riotgirls situation.  Maybe you didnt read the original thread.  What I find particularly sad is that despite how hurt she is and how desparately she was crying out for help,  someone actually made a thread designed to condemn her choices during this extremely emotional time in her life. 

A very sad commentary on this group. 

My posts here were made in an effort to make a point.  Apparently it fell on deaf ears, and blind eyes, as everyone is so busy pontificating their sainthood, instead of giving a rats ass about a person who is in need of support.



(in reply to Noah)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Double talk?? - 6/26/2006 8:38:19 PM   
Noah


Posts: 1660
Joined: 7/5/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo
Noah:

You have made alot of presumptions about me, my life, my child and my ex.  I have no desire to disqualify your innacurate assumptions.  Im sorry that you would even equate "friends" as a sufficient replacement for a child's mother.  But thats beside the point anyway.

Suffice it to say that my post was written in the context of  riotgirls situation.  Maybe you didnt read the original thread.  What I find particularly sad is that despite how hurt she is and how desparately she was crying out for help,  someone actually made a thread designed to condemn her choices during this extremely emotional time in her life. 

A very sad commentary on this group. 

My posts here were made in an effort to make a point.  Apparently it fell on deaf ears, and blind eyes, as everyone is so busy pontificating their sainthood, instead of giving a rats ass about a person who is in need of support.





Marie, I made no assumptions whatever. I took you at your word when you said in clear, unambiguous language:


"bottom line...If I am not safe, my child is not safe.  If I get hurt, my child has no caregiver."

My last post was made in an effort to point out that taking a position in favor of something other than ethical relativism does not entail any sort of personal claim to goodness, or sainthood pontification as you put it. A point which you, in your agitation utterly overlooked.

The fact that someone is crying out for help doesn't equate for me to a perfect right to have all of her choices validated, irrespective of their rightness or wrongness, wiseness or self-destructiveness. It is of course possible to condemn a given choice a person makes without attacking that person.

Your comments here are generally so well thought out and empathetic. Your emotion seems to be getting in the way of your seeing what people are actually saying today.

By the way, I know of a case where with the loss of both parents, friends did indeed take in and raise a child to be a healthy, happy wonderful person. I think she and her adoptive parents might find your comment about parental sufficiency callous, or worse. My point here is that all of this flailing from you is contrary to the impression you have consistently given in your posting here, to my eyes.

I hope tomorrow finds you in better spirits.

(in reply to marieToo)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Double talk?? - 6/26/2006 9:29:20 PM   
marieToo


Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006
From: Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Noah


quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo
Noah:

You have made alot of presumptions about me, my life, my child and my ex.  I have no desire to disqualify your innacurate assumptions.  Im sorry that you would even equate "friends" as a sufficient replacement for a child's mother.  But thats beside the point anyway.

Suffice it to say that my post was written in the context of  riotgirls situation.  Maybe you didnt read the original thread.  What I find particularly sad is that despite how hurt she is and how desparately she was crying out for help,  someone actually made a thread designed to condemn her choices during this extremely emotional time in her life. 

A very sad commentary on this group. 

My posts here were made in an effort to make a point.  Apparently it fell on deaf ears, and blind eyes, as everyone is so busy pontificating their sainthood, instead of giving a rats ass about a person who is in need of support.





Marie, I made no assumptions whatever. I took you at your word when you said in clear, unambiguous language:


My last post was made in an effort to point out that taking a position in favor of something other than ethical relativism does not entail any sort of personal claim to goodness, or sainthood pontification as you put it. A point which you, in your agitation utterly overlooked.

The fact that someone is crying out for help doesn't equate for me to a perfect right to have all of her choices validated, irrespective of their rightness or wrongness, wiseness or self-destructiveness. It is of course possible to condemn a given choice a person makes without attacking that person.

Your comments here are generally so well thought out and empathetic. Your emotion seems to be getting in the way of your seeing what people are actually saying today.

By the way, I know of a case where with the loss of both parents, friends did indeed take in and raise a child to be a healthy, happy wonderful person. I think she and her adoptive parents might find your comment about parental sufficiency callous, or worse. My point here is that all of this flailing from you is contrary to the impression you have consistently given in your posting here, to my eyes.

I hope tomorrow finds you in better spirits.



Noah:

I never said clearly in ANY language that my ex was dead or incarcerated or whatever other innacuracies and assumptions you made about my life.  If you knew and understood my life, my situation, and my relationship with my child, you'd have never spoken those words to me. Now, thats as much as my child is going to be spoken of in this forum. So, help yourself to your own presumptions.  Im not here to deprive you of your own personal misinterpretations.    

Nor am I concerned that your friends who raised an adopted child would find my words callous.  Im sure someone somewhere somehow could/would find any random persons' words, pulled out of context, callous.  Just as surely as someone will always come along on these boards and twist the shit out of someone's statement until it fits their agenda du jour.

I did get your point about the ethics thing, believe it or not.   However, it would have been responded to with respect had you addressed only that, instead of making attempts to agitate me with your fancy verbal footwork and your sarcastic sympathies and phoney well-wishes.   Im not impressed.

About my "spirits"....  Theres no way you could know based on a particular subject matter on a message board what kind of spirits Im in.   But by all means, assume they need improvement, if it works for your argument.

marie.


(in reply to Noah)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Double talk?? - 6/27/2006 12:10:26 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

Actually...it IS against the law to go through a person's mail or any of their private belongings without their express permission and if said person chose to bring charges against you, they could.  In the case of mail delivered through the postal system, it is considered a violation of federal law, whether or not the letter has been previously opened.

Note that this is not an attempt to justify the abuser of riotgirl.  I'm sure that there are things he has done that are illegal and that could be her recourse. 


I'm not sure you are right here. It is against the law to intercept mail but as for going through opened mail in ones home, I'd doubt it is against the law, certainly I can't find any mention of a law by googling.

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Double talk?? - 6/27/2006 12:51:52 AM   
Brosco


Posts: 238
Joined: 5/29/2006
Status: offline
I'd love for another to go thru all my emails, delete all the spam so that I have only messages of substance to view.  I have nothing to hide and share my login and passwords to any account I have with my partner.  In a D/s lifestyle trust and honesty is important, excluding another the access is not building the trust.

I have no hesitation in condoning 'snooping' if any actions have created a mistrust.

Brosco

_____________________________

Any Dom that believes he is in complete control ... has a very clever subbie.

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Double talk?? - 6/27/2006 3:18:01 AM   
agirl


Posts: 4530
Joined: 6/14/2004
Status: offline
 Fast reply.

Where rightness and wrongness are concerned, there will not be concensus. The law of the land is not the ultimate guide.

A person's ethics are their own and situations we find ourselves in will  often dictate how we apply them.

I have compromised my basic ethical ideas because I chose to , in light of situations I've been in. Whether it would be judged as *right or wrong* doesn't concern me. *I* am the one that has to be comfortable with those decisions and choices.

I have and do lie, I have and do break the law....I mostly know that for me....the choices to do so were and are *right* AT the time IN the situation.

agirl





(in reply to Brosco)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Double talk?? - 6/27/2006 9:08:27 AM   
TxBadMan


Posts: 198
Joined: 4/7/2006
From: Moody, Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mew

I didn't want to highjack riotgirl's thread, so I am posting here in a new one. 
 
It seems to me there is a lot of double talk going on here, regarding going through your Master's email. 
 
I have to ask how a Master breaks your trust?   If he does it in front of you, is he not being honest?    If he does it behind your back, how would you know?  
 
Everyone told me it was "just wrong to go through your Master's email", yet everyone is telling her, "bravo".   
 
Either I am just plain stupid, or I am having a major brain fart this morning, because I really don't get it.    If you sense something isn't right in the relationship, don't you owe it to yourself to find out the truth if your not getting it from Master?   
 
I think many here are giving mixed advice.
 
~mew~


I believe in being brutally honest with my girls. I read their mail, they are allowed to read mine if they feel the need to. Any logs from IM are saved; they are allowed to read those if they feel the need to. If I feel like playing with another girl, I tell them. It's their choice if they like it or not, it will not change the end result. If they feel like playing with another, all they have to do is tell me. Does not mean that they will get what they want, but I perfer to know that they are thinking of it.
Open, honest communication is what keeps a relationship going, from my perspective anyway.

_____________________________

Chris



(in reply to mew)
Profile   Post #: 71
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Double talk?? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078