marieToo
Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006 From: Jersey Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Noah quote:
ORIGINAL: marieToo Noah: You have made alot of presumptions about me, my life, my child and my ex. I have no desire to disqualify your innacurate assumptions. Im sorry that you would even equate "friends" as a sufficient replacement for a child's mother. But thats beside the point anyway. Suffice it to say that my post was written in the context of riotgirls situation. Maybe you didnt read the original thread. What I find particularly sad is that despite how hurt she is and how desparately she was crying out for help, someone actually made a thread designed to condemn her choices during this extremely emotional time in her life. A very sad commentary on this group. My posts here were made in an effort to make a point. Apparently it fell on deaf ears, and blind eyes, as everyone is so busy pontificating their sainthood, instead of giving a rats ass about a person who is in need of support. Marie, I made no assumptions whatever. I took you at your word when you said in clear, unambiguous language: My last post was made in an effort to point out that taking a position in favor of something other than ethical relativism does not entail any sort of personal claim to goodness, or sainthood pontification as you put it. A point which you, in your agitation utterly overlooked. The fact that someone is crying out for help doesn't equate for me to a perfect right to have all of her choices validated, irrespective of their rightness or wrongness, wiseness or self-destructiveness. It is of course possible to condemn a given choice a person makes without attacking that person. Your comments here are generally so well thought out and empathetic. Your emotion seems to be getting in the way of your seeing what people are actually saying today. By the way, I know of a case where with the loss of both parents, friends did indeed take in and raise a child to be a healthy, happy wonderful person. I think she and her adoptive parents might find your comment about parental sufficiency callous, or worse. My point here is that all of this flailing from you is contrary to the impression you have consistently given in your posting here, to my eyes. I hope tomorrow finds you in better spirits. Noah: I never said clearly in ANY language that my ex was dead or incarcerated or whatever other innacuracies and assumptions you made about my life. If you knew and understood my life, my situation, and my relationship with my child, you'd have never spoken those words to me. Now, thats as much as my child is going to be spoken of in this forum. So, help yourself to your own presumptions. Im not here to deprive you of your own personal misinterpretations. Nor am I concerned that your friends who raised an adopted child would find my words callous. Im sure someone somewhere somehow could/would find any random persons' words, pulled out of context, callous. Just as surely as someone will always come along on these boards and twist the shit out of someone's statement until it fits their agenda du jour. I did get your point about the ethics thing, believe it or not. However, it would have been responded to with respect had you addressed only that, instead of making attempts to agitate me with your fancy verbal footwork and your sarcastic sympathies and phoney well-wishes. Im not impressed. About my "spirits".... Theres no way you could know based on a particular subject matter on a message board what kind of spirits Im in. But by all means, assume they need improvement, if it works for your argument. marie.
|