TricklessMagic
Posts: 248
Joined: 9/14/2009 Status: offline
|
Ask the Koreans in California during the Rodney King Riots, ask the folks of suburbia after Katrina in Baton Rouge, Lafayette, and New Orleans. There are those who believe self-defense is immoral and wrong, I think you are one of them by the read of your post. There are many that people should merely submit to the will of the government no matter its will rather than have the mere hope of resistance, again I think you are one of them. If the government came for my guns, I doubt they would find many of them, and even if they did, I'd make more. And I'd make more ammo. Yes it'd be time consuming and a pain in the ass but it can be done. I'm one of the few guys at the range shooting black powder 7.62x39 (had to tweak the recoil springs) and .243 Winchester. I also know how to make improved forms of Cordite, not IMR per say, not by a long shot, but still an improvement on Cordite which will function in Chau Chauts, most bolt action rifles, lever action, some semi-autos, etc. etc.. There are those who see the desire of independence and liberty as evil. To be able to do things others can't, is evil in some people's eyes. To have the confidence, desire for responsibility, capability, of freedom and liberty, is evil in some people's eyes. Those eyes belong to certain elements of an anti-gun, anti-American, herd of lemmings who happily go ignorantly into the march of disarmament while avoiding the challenge of exceptionalism as they decry the exceptionalism of others. As they blame those who have sweated and sacrificed for their success, demanding their "fair share" for a thing they did nothing to build and took no chance to make. Arms, guns, mean many things to many people. To some a tradition, to some a hope, but to those who hate liberty, exceptionalism, and freedom, it represents a threat. A threat they can't stand to have exist. As it stands antithetical to their perverse cravings for subjugation and victimization, maybe not of themselves, but of others. Besides guns are terrible for delivering justice to a tyrannical government and support proletariat. Too finite, too easy to dismiss. No there are so many far more effective means and methods for the guilty. The destroyers of liberty and freedom. The murder craven scum. quote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers We've been reading and hearing ad nauseum about how we simply must be able to keep our guns and our gun rights now even to the point where universal background checks are too much of a burden upon that right. Historically, politically and sociologically those who feel that way will tell you and also what has been ad nauseum, we need this right to protect us from the govt. I will not source this as it is something that has been in our national dialogue seems forever. So here it is gun keepers...just when do you start shooting ? I mean that's what guns are for...shooting. Presumably we need these guns for just that and to protect us from govt. Ok, so when do you start shooting police ? When do you start shooting say, the NG or the US Army ? I submit to you that our guns rights afford us no such freedom or protection. At no time will your right to keep arms, protect you from the big, bad govt. Few in this debate ever seem to really want to actually think about the actual practice and use of these guns for just such a so-called protection. What say you ?
|