Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? - 4/30/2013 4:37:52 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

Then what is your point in demading an admision that the US has never had a mass confiscation of firearms.
That is obvious since once confiscated firearms are never returned to their rightfull owners.
Thus it appears to be a common elementary retorical question intenedd to force us to face the reality that there is no threat.
What is your point.
You can't hit a nerve when you are fireing blanks.

Oh, good heavens.

No one has "demanded" anything. I simply asked a straightforward question in the hope of getting a clearer sense of whether the oft-mentioned fear of the government's coming to take our guns is rooted in history. I appreciated the examples folks offered and was particularly intrigued by the plight of Japanese-Americans.

The fact that you took my question--which you proved incapable of answering without deflection, snark, and condescension--as a "demand" for an "admission" and a to-be-resented effort to "force" you to "face reality" strikes me as interesting and telling.

Then again what is your point?
If you just happened to follow the exact path of others who using the same words as you to then proclaim that we are then force to accept their reality then it is an unfortunate. I have gone down that path a dozen times and that is all it tells.
If you are heading somewhere else where is it?
As I said you had to know the answer before you asked the question as no government returns confiscated firearms.
Thus since we have them they were never confiscated.
Since every question you have asked is superficial and the answers self evident I waas giving you credit for a deeper meaning, perhaps I was in error.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 4/30/2013 4:46:13 PM >

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? - 4/30/2013 4:43:39 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Then again what is your point?

Sigh.

My "point" is that I was curious about whether there's a historical basis for the fear that Uncle Sam is coming to "take our guns."

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? - 4/30/2013 4:49:21 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

Then again what is your point?

Sigh.

My "point" is that I was curious about whether there's a historical basis for the fear that Uncle Sam is coming to "take our guns."

Sorry I was giving you credit for more knowledge and depth, my mistake.

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? - 4/30/2013 4:55:34 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Sorry I was giving you credit for more knowledge and depth, my mistake.

It's interesting but not surprising that you (a) once again proved incapable of engaging without personal attacks and (b) see the quest for knowledge as something to sneer at.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? - 4/30/2013 5:07:02 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

It's interesting but not surprising that you (a) once again proved incapable of engaging without personal attacks and (b) see the quest for knowledge as something to sneer at.


No, I am not sneering at you, I did realize that you actually lacked that information and was treating you as someone who thought they were being oh so clever. Had I realized my responses would have been different.
Unfortunatly you never deviated from the well worn path of those people.

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? - 4/30/2013 5:08:20 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
FR

On a lighter note, the reference to train tracks a while back brought to mind a favorite Chas. Addams cartoon. I finally got a chance to find it online.



_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? - 4/30/2013 5:08:39 PM   
FunCouple5280


Posts: 559
Joined: 10/30/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

Sorry I was giving you credit for more knowledge and depth, my mistake.

It's interesting but not surprising that you (a) once again proved incapable of engaging without personal attacks and (b) see the quest for knowledge as something to sneer at.



Lol Just don't engage. I have tried that and/or made innocuous devils advocate remarks and people get all butt-hurt. There is no point in explaining it. After last week I am dropping it once they go there. I may send one nasty 'go to hell for being an ass note' but after that I am done. Some people have no sense of humor or courtesy.

I won't name names but some people don't understand what intellectual discourse is. Rather than proving inaccuracy they resort to calling you puerile and then offer nothing to the conversation.

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? - 4/30/2013 5:13:13 PM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

So while I share your caution, I also share your feeling that accepting a 20-round magazine capacity limit wouldn't be worst thing that could happen. If the other side was willing to offer outlawing the slaughter pens that they are pleased to call "gun-free" zones in denial of reality, Sandy Hook being only the latest of those realities, I'd consider that worth the trade.



We may not have to make a trade. It seems like the idea of arming school officials and teachers is picking up steam. 3 states including Utah and Hawaii, I can't remember the other, have allowed armed teachers for quite some time. North Dakota just passed a law allowing armed teachers and Arizona and Florida have bills working their way through the legislature. I think there are other states considering the same type of legislation, with staunch opposition of coarse. Texas has allowed armed teachers if the school
Is 30 minutes from any type of law enforcement.



< Message edited by lovmuffin -- 4/30/2013 5:15:50 PM >


_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? - 4/30/2013 5:22:53 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

On a lighter note, the reference to train tracks a while back brought to mind a favorite Chas. Addams cartoon. I finally got a chance to find it online.


LOL

Sorry for the misunderstanding

Didn't he do the Addams Familiy

< Message edited by BamaD -- 4/30/2013 5:23:56 PM >

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? - 4/30/2013 5:29:25 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

We may not have to make a trade. It seems like the idea of arming school officials and teachers is picking up steam. 3 states including Utah and Hawaii, I can't remember the other, have allowed armed teachers for quite some time. North Dakota just passed a law allowing armed teachers and Arizona and Florida have bills working their way through the legislature. I think there are other states considering the same type of legislation, with staunch opposition of coarse. Texas has allowed armed teachers if the school
Is 30 minutes from any type of law enforcement.


All do require some varification that they are qualified don't they. Training course or something. I hope.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 4/30/2013 5:33:22 PM >

(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? - 4/30/2013 5:46:24 PM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

We may not have to make a trade. It seems like the idea of arming school officials and teachers is picking up steam. 3 states including Utah and Hawaii, I can't remember the other, have allowed armed teachers for quite some time. North Dakota just passed a law allowing armed teachers and Arizona and Florida have bills working their way through the legislature. I think there are other states considering the same type of legislation, with staunch opposition of coarse. Texas has allowed armed teachers if the school
Is 30 minutes from any type of law enforcement.


All do require some varification that they are qualified don't they. Training course or something. I hope.




I don't know all the details but I believe in the states that have allowed armed carry in schools only requires a CWP.

_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? - 4/30/2013 5:47:50 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

I don't know all the details but I believe in the states that have allowed armed carry in schools only requires a CWP.


TY

(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? - 5/1/2013 8:12:06 AM   
papassion


Posts: 487
Joined: 3/28/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

The simple presence of the firearms serves as a deterrent to ever reaching a place of needing to fire them, much as the sound of the action on a pump shotgun dramatically reduces the odds you'll need to pull the trigger.

And I'm joining the fire extinguisher mock.

This is my point. The govt. comes to take your guns. Soon as they hear that shotgun pumped, some sniper takes you out and...likely in few seconds.


You sound like someone who was never in the military. First, a LOT of the military sent to "take the guns" would NOT be down with the plan to take all the guns. There would be a lot of "miscommunication" and "mistakes" that would make a successful operation almost impossible. Just like when the
Germans forced the Jews to work in munition factories, the Jews sabatoged lots of equipment. Remember that dustup in Russia at the parliament building? The Russian soldiers refused to fire on the Russian citizens. You badly underestimate the intelligence and patriotism of the US military corp.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? - 5/1/2013 8:20:44 AM   
papassion


Posts: 487
Joined: 3/28/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

Then again what is your point?

Sigh.

My "point" is that I was curious about whether there's a historical basis for the fear that Uncle Sam is coming to "take our guns."


Does gathering up PEOPLE and putting them behind barbed wire count? I suggest you read about how the Asians were incarcerated during the war.

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? - 5/1/2013 8:24:26 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

Then again what is your point?

Sigh.

My "point" is that I was curious about whether there's a historical basis for the fear that Uncle Sam is coming to "take our guns."


Does gathering up PEOPLE and putting them behind barbed wire count?

No, it doesn't.
When have guns been confiscated?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? - 5/1/2013 8:45:29 AM   
papassion


Posts: 487
Joined: 3/28/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

Then again what is your point?

Sigh.

My "point" is that I was curious about whether there's a historical basis for the fear that Uncle Sam is coming to "take our guns."


Does gathering up PEOPLE and putting them behind barbed wire count?

No, it doesn't.
When have guns been confiscated?

Talking about gasping for straws! You honestly think rounding up PEOPLE and putting them behind barbed wire is not ten times as offensive as gathering up inanimate objects? You don't have to reply. The room knows you're just about semantics and not the "meat" of the argument.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? - 5/1/2013 8:49:33 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Well, it is an inept analogy, since rounding up and imprisoning people based on  some physical attribute is something that is American as hell and been repeated many times and embedded in our constitution, where the other is not.

There is no 'meat' there, not even pablum, it couldn't be even characterized as thin gruel.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? - 5/1/2013 8:54:32 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
ummmmm wasnt there a war on when the japanese were gathered up??? right or wrong, theres a lot of your countrymen think the same should be done iwth muslims... NOT gun owners, so the analogy is fucking stupid
Britains gathered up poles and germans, and put them in camps, DURING WAR... so much different than merely gathering up guns cos stupid poeple cant behave with them.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? - 5/1/2013 9:00:02 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

The simple presence of the firearms serves as a deterrent to ever reaching a place of needing to fire them, much as the sound of the action on a pump shotgun dramatically reduces the odds you'll need to pull the trigger.

And I'm joining the fire extinguisher mock.

This is my point. The govt. comes to take your guns. Soon as they hear that shotgun pumped, some sniper takes you out and...likely in few seconds.


You sound like someone who was never in the military. First, a LOT of the military sent to "take the guns" would NOT be down with the plan to take all the guns. There would be a lot of "miscommunication" and "mistakes" that would make a successful operation almost impossible. Just like when the
Germans forced the Jews to work in munition factories, the Jews sabatoged lots of equipment. Remember that dustup in Russia at the parliament building? The Russian soldiers refused to fire on the Russian citizens. You badly underestimate the intelligence and patriotism of the US military corp.

First of all, whether or not one has been in the military has nothing at all to do with this and haven't the slightest idea where you get that. Second, all of the protesting and non-cooperation historically and now had nothing and will not have anything to do with whether or not govt. comes to take your guns and successfully so and once in that factory or FEMA camp or GITMO, by then...it is way too late.

As for cooperation in such an operation...the military (Louisiana National Guard) had and will have no problem if called upon, going door to door (Katrina) and taking guns and encountered not a peep of protest, let alone...anybody shooting them to stop them.

How about a little indicator ? A car chase of suspected, repeat...suspected criminals UNARMED stopped 50 rounds was it. (Cleveland) Too late for them too. You think state police, swat and the various national guards will do any less ? I don't.

(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? - 5/1/2013 9:03:57 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion
Talking about gasping for straws!

Okay then.
Trying to equate locking people up in camps during a war and confiscating people's guns is an analogy so straw graspy it beggars belief.
Happy now?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The 2nd amendment. So when do you ? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125