SpanishMatMaster
Posts: 967
Joined: 9/28/2011 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri Better question: Is it okay (for anyone) to use those deaths to score political points? I'd give you a definite "yes". Politics affects life in a decisive way. It kills people and saves people's lives. Using deaths as political argument is therefore not invalid per se. I honestly do not know much about the situation in Texas. But if, just as supposition, lack of regulations would be part of the cause of deaths, wouldn't be valid to use these deaths as argument to provoke a political change, which leads to better regulations? So... yes. It is. People who think that "politics" is something trivial and irrelevant and should not be connected to "serious things of life" are utterly wrong. This does not render the argument using deaths valid, of course, that's another question. As for the cartoon, I consider it tasteless. The correct place for such accusations is not a cartoon but a thoughtful analysis with serious data. As for the reaction of the Governor, I consider it stupid: a Governor should not care about such things, and the cartoon is not mocking the deaths. If the families had reacted with strong opinions against the cartoonist, I would be far more understanding to them, of course. As for the connection between lack of regulation and accident, I have no idea, but it is at least not crazy stuff (= it is not like connecting the price of the bananas in Russia with the accident).
_____________________________
Humanist (therefore Atheist), intelligent, cultivated and very humble :) If I don't answer you, maybe I "hid" you: PM me if you want. “Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, pause and reflect.” (Mark Twain)
|