Arturas
Posts: 3245
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: thompsonx
quote:
ORIGINAL: subsissy4bbc
I don't see what the big deal is, they both say pretty much the same thing, the "Republican versions" are just more clear because they clarify what parties are being discussed.
Perhaps a closer association with the meaning of the word quote would be useful.
She is correct. Drilling down into the facts is a good thing, not bad. But nice spin.quote:
Also did I miss where a computer tech verified which is the original versions? To believe that what the administration says are the originals, just because they say so, is foolish given how many times their stories have changed so far.
As compared to faux news which it's owner refers to as the "propaganda arm of the republican party"
That shot is meaningless and suggests you having nothing substantial to counter her excellent points.quote:
And not to be confrontational but your opinion is kind of diminished by the fact that you refer to Fox News as Faux News. You don't already have a bias, do you?
One of the reasons it is refered to as faux news is that they refuse to broadcast the facts. In canada that is illegal so faux news is not allowed to spread it's propaganda in canada.
This is also incredible. If I were to sink to your level I would suggest MSNBC is the propaganda arm of the Left. Oops...quote:
Finally, in regards to the post above about all this being to diminish Hillary Clinton, here name is mentioned so much because she was supposed to be in charge of that department. I understand that as large as the government is she can't be expected to know every detail, which is a problem for a different discussion, but she made herself look foolish by not gathering ever detail she could after the fact, to find out what went wrong.
What went wrong??????Because someone recognized a "soft target" and took it implies that something went wrong????
No. What is wrong is it was a soft target to begin with because of poor leadership from the top and is softer even now that we have lost face in the world by letting it happen. Hellooo...reality check.
quote:
Blaming a video and suggesting that we can fix the problem, without knowing what caused it also did not help her cause. How many months later, in her little "what does it matter now" blow up, she still couldn't say that it was terrorism, it was because of a video or just people out for a walk. smh
Perhaps a little research on the "back story" about te vidio. From what I have read it looks like the administration is tryng to get enough traction to go after the fellow who made it.
Oh? Perhaps to be credible you can share this "back story"? But in the meantime, let me share this, from what I have read the administration cannot protect or even rescue Americans, which from what I read in the Constitution is it's primary responsibility, "to provide for the common defense" and from what I read the President is the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces charged with this Constitutional responsibility and "reason for being". So, we should fire him for failing. Failure is not an option for the President and fail he did.
< Message edited by Arturas -- 5/17/2013 10:04:23 AM >
_____________________________
"We master Our world."
|
Republicans Altered Benghazi Emails, CBS News Report Cl... - 
Profile
.gif){kind=avatar}
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread