SpanishMatMaster
Posts: 967
Joined: 9/28/2011 Status: offline
|
Hello, tweakabelle, and thank you for your answer. Very interesting. Let us go for it. quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle Sorry SpanishMatMaster but I wasn't attempting to answer your question. I was addressing the OP. Ok. The fact that you answered me (according to the button) confused me. It's ok, of course. Common problem here. quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle I would have bought the Taliban off in order to get OBL. 1. Improbable to work, actually, the Taliban were getting enough money, capturing OBL would have been hard also for them (he was protected by the rest of Al Qaeda) and the would not have risked to be seen as money-mad traitors by Al Qaeda and the rest of the Islamists. 2. Even if it worked, it would hardly resolve the problem. Al Qaeda would still exist with a powerful base in Afghanistan, ready to prepare the next attack to take revenge. And then what, buy again one man for every 3000 Americans killed? Maybe you would end up with Al Qaeda actually delivering you the man voluntarily, they have enough suicidal warriors and one billion dollar for each one is a good deal, they only need to use a 10% of the money you are giving them to make the next attack against America. Curious way to finance the terrorism against your own country, I would say... quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle I would have done anything short of actually invading if they declined my offer - financed and armed the Northern Alliance, given them aerial support and bribed the warlords to change allegiance from the Taliban is one option. This would have provoked a lot of deaths, isn't it? A war with the only land support of the Northern Alliance and maybe some warlords (only maybe, the Taliban can also bribe, they have the whole money from drugs to support them, plus other allied countries) could be lost, or at least lasted much more than the invasion, costing much more afghan lives. They are not a priority of yours, for your policy an American soldier is more important than an Afghan civilian? Does this include children? quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle 1. That strategy has never succeeded in Afghanistan; Actually wrong, but let us leave this by side. quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle 2. An invasion was precisely the reaction AQ desired. I very much doubt that they wanted to be ripped off their calm and prosper bases in Afghanistan, no. quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle 3. Foreign military invasions and occupations are among the causes of the problems, they are never the solution. Interesting. Does this apply to Nazi Germany? Just to give an easy example. quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle Do I need to add that I would never have dreamt of invading Iraq, as Bush did? No, you have not, see the posting you button-quoted :) Best regards.
< Message edited by SpanishMatMaster -- 5/27/2013 3:35:09 AM >
_____________________________
Humanist (therefore Atheist), intelligent, cultivated and very humble :) If I don't answer you, maybe I "hid" you: PM me if you want. “Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, pause and reflect.” (Mark Twain)
|