DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Aswad quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri I think this is part of the problem, though, Aswad. IMO, everyone is guilty of it, not just you. But, if you are going to call out Michael for taking a political stance, shouldn't you also call out the rest of those making a political stance on this? Note that I never saw the OP. Good people are worth calling out. Bad people aren't, unless they need to be shut down. There's too many idiots out there for me to bother calling out each and every one of them. Particularly the ones whose posts I don't see in the first place, the ones whose posts are- consistently and over time- detrimental to my ability to post constructively, damaging to my faith in humanity, or in other ways a net loss to interact with. I saw Michael's post, however. I usually do. And I will continue to read his posts until and unless he tells me otherwise. But I've usually not replied, as I've had this vague recollection that he blocked me over a misunderstanding a while back. This time, though, I had something worthwhile to say to him about his son, so I said it, whether or not he read it (as it turns out, he didn't, and wouldn't have known if not for you quoting me). While saying it, I bungled an attempt at letting him know some of us lefties care a lot about veterans and the fallen, regardless of how we feel about the CICs that have wielded them. Michael has shown himself capable of better than the misplaced 'leftist' comment (the anger is fine, but should be for the OP). As for the OP... well, there's a reason I didn't see it. IWYW, — Aswad. Thank you for that explanation. I can appreciate your angle much better now, and I do apologize for the unwarranted accusation.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|