njlauren
Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011 Status: offline
|
I am upset about this, not because the NSA has the data per se, but that there are no checks and balances over it. It is true in the digital domain there is no privacy, but this takes it one step further because now all this data is in one place. The actual NSA system if I understand it correctly is doing a domain search looking for patterns, they aren't focusing on any one person or traffic from one person, but patterns, and using that to narrow down to find suspicious things (I agree with another poster, from what I know of this kind of thing, it is probably unlikely to actually come up with much information in advance). For its intended use, I am not totally against it, even though I suspect it is a fools errand. What bothers me, though, is that this data can also be used to target people specifically, to literally give a profile of an individual person (mind you, accused of nothing), and show pretty much who they are, what they do, etc, and that is where the abuse is. When Patriot Act that authorized this kind of shit, and warrantless wiretaps, the Bush administration justice department, for example, tried to argue that if evidence of illegal (but not terrorist) activity came to light through wiretaps and so forth, that the evidence taken there should be allowed in court (fortunately, both lawmakers and courts said no fucking way, because it violated the whole point of getting search warrants, the whole point of them was to stop fishing like this, ad require you to have proof, first). If searching for a terrorist and you find a tax cheat, there isn't the urgency to report that, and in doing so violates the constitution protections against broad searches. Something like this can be used for that, and unfortunately, probably will be. Who is there to guarantee only Prism can use this? I have to laugh at the GOP members who are outraged, because their party championed the Patriot Acts along with Democrats, and now they are outraged? This can be used to silence political opponents, and God help us if we get some bible thumper like Bush back in there, if you think the IRS thing is outrageous, how would you like the Jesus freaks looking over your shoulder? Or some whacked out feminist type out to get rid of porn and so forth? My concern is that this has been allowed to go on with no safeguards against it being used other than for its intended business. And in light of the IRS mess, in light of the AG hacking into reporters e-mails to find leaks, it doesn't sit well, and yes, I am pissed off at Obama, as much or even more than I was at Bush and his administration of freaks like Dick Cheney and Alberto Gonzalez and the like. Obama was a constitutional law teacher, and he can't see the problems with this? Saying "Trust us" is idiotic, when whether it is his administration or his predecessor, both have shown the lengths they will go to circumvent the law.
|