JeffBC
Posts: 5799
Joined: 2/12/2012 From: Canada Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TheHeretic Of course, having posted this on a forum, Jeff, you've pretty much guaranteed that any communication channels you set up from here on will be about as secure as a flashing billboard. Your best bet was security by obscurity, and you've blown that now. I've seen you refer to your tin-foil hat in other posts, but I'm thinking you used the cheap store brand, because you aren't anywhere near paranoid enough. *laughs* OK, but how about you leave the data security to us pro's, eh? Unless, that is, you have sat on ANSI security working committees. Otherwise, I'm pretty comfortable that I can, in fact, setup such a channel... in quite a few different ways actually. Nor is it particularly difficult. By the way, the standard line among data security professionals is "Security through obscurity is not" I think I'll stick with the tried and true mathematical approaches. The fact that some people are OK even with this is rather astonishing. I'm assuming the same folks who are OK with this will be perfectly good being implanted with RFID tags... you know... for our safety in case we get lost. Honestly, if you aren't OK with walking around with a camera recording your every single move then you should not be OK with this. The amount of your life that can be reconstructed with all this data would be... uh... HIGHLY detailed.
_____________________________
I'm a lover of "what is", not because I'm a spiritual person, but because it hurts when I argue with reality. -- Bryon Katie "You're humbly arrogant" -- sunshinemiss officially a member of the K Crowd
|