|
Powergamz1 -> RE: Yet another campus shooting. (6/9/2013 3:27:29 PM)
|
Employ all the sophomoric tactics at the expense of dead people you want. I've answered your questions, and I'm still waiting for you to do the same.
One last time, what I posted was that the more deaths, the greater the tragedy.
I pointed out the irony that *once the shooting starts* (shootings that are fueled by too easy access to too many guns, and a shoot-em-up gun culture fueled by the media), they are usually ended by police with weapons... Real life is often ironic.
Another poster said something about seizing all privately owned guns, and in direct response to that particular post, I linked to the fact that there are places out there where campus police aren't allowed to have guns, and pointed out that *in this case* it was a good thing that the notion of disarming everyone including the police, hadn't reached this particular campus yet. At least good for people other than the shooter.
If you have facts to refute any of what I actually said, I'll be fascinated to see them.
quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
Try re-reading the words you said in post #51.
It was nothing about who started what or when.
You are trying to dodge the issue.
You categorically stated "...the fact is that more people would have died in this incident (and many others) if the extremist calls to disarm everyone including police...".
Now you are shifting the goalposts yet again.
What you are saying now (and quoting that you 'actually' said) is bunkum because you never said such.
Don't change the story to fit you ideas as they come to mind rather than deal with what you really said.
So your statement was never said by you and now you are wanting to support what I said about the facts??
Use Google.
Look at any website giving gun deaths per capita and see how the US is waaaay in front of any, and I do mean any, other country.
There are your facts.
|
|
|
|
