Focus50
Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004 From: Newcastle, Australia Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Im running low in Focus induced intelligence What is really starting to get to me with you is that, yes, there are a few... few... who are into the attack mode almost all the time. Think its not noticed? of course it is... but its not the majority of women on these threads. You know me, I call em out on that bullshit when its aimed at me. But Im not here to protect the newer people. I answer questions to the best of my ability. Sure, I get snarky every once in a while. Even had a post pulled yesterday (politics) for making the poster the topic. What I find interesting is, as I looked around at the other threads, the amount of men who are playing into the attack mode.... via agreement with others. Its not always subtle.... and yet no one seems to notice... or mind. Now, I really have to wonder how much of this "discussion" for you is personal. But as to the other. Honestly, if we were discussing a newbie who posted they were into..say... impregnating their 18 year old slave. No issue, right? Then you discover that said slave is also their daughter because its on their profile. Do you still not have an issue? Should only one person speak out against that? Should no one because its a kink and they are both adults? In that scenario, I could care less what two adults screw... as long as both are adults and both are consenting, with the legal ability to consent. I would have massive issues with the impregnation part and would be quite vocal about that aspect. Its my field. if I and 3 others speak out against that part, and others speak out against the "incest"... is it still ganging up? Actually, your post in 38 didnt cover my question. Not being the kinda Dom who'd intentionally get under a sub's skin.... Scratch that. Well yeah, your question is predominantly a hypothetical. I didn't address your actual hypothetical but between here and those 2 other related threads, I felt sure you'd have the gist of my views by now. It's a matter of where the line is drawn. The Mods have their version and I had my own. Not being one to turn a blind eye to a cowardly attack, to "cross the street" etc makes me a White Knight, apparently. I'd venture there's a line in there, too. <shrugs> Anyway, a common theme to a particular topic question becomes a gang attack on the person asking the question. Blaming me for harping on about it is to blame that newbie OP for keeping the thread going by not running away. I'm wrong and she's wrong because there are more saying the opposite? And this is where I point out that I never once said any of you were wrong for your views on cheating, but the way those views were being expressed, yeah, I said plenty. Sexyred openly stated she didn't address the topic at all because the topic had been done "adnauseum". Apparently I'm to conclude that even more CM regulars piling into that newbie OP had yet to be done "adnauseum" enough. Give up? Focus.
_____________________________
Never underestimate the persuasive power of stupid people in large groups. <unknown> Your food is for eating, not torturing. <my mum> (Errm, when I was a kid)
|