RE: ALex strikes again (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Hillwilliam -> RE: ALex strikes again (6/20/2013 10:21:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

It's going to be fun, watching people try to deny this one!

I'd wait till the documentary comes out and people can take a look at what ever evidence these guys can present. The questions would be who and why didn't they take credit for the attack (terrorism isn't effective if no one knows it was terrorism).

DS, ya beat me to that one.
Ken, who says it was terrorism and not a military accident?
The latter would fit in a lot better with the facts as stated in the article. Our government is all too eager to scream "Terrorist attack" but they're really reluctant to own up to their own mistakes.

To the best of my knowledge there are no military facilities at the end of the JFK runways. So you're positing a soldier with a shoulder fired AA missile just happened to be there, just happened to lock the jet and accidently fired the weapon? That's just so incredibly unlikely I can't believe you even suggested it.

Seeing as it was 11-12 miles offshore and at 11K feet when it blew up, land based military facilities would be highly unlikely. There were, however several naval vessels in the area.
Shoulder fired land based weapons don't have that kind of range.
I can't believe you assumed it would have to be hit from the land.[8|]

Remember, our navy shot down an Iranian airliner.




DomKen -> RE: ALex strikes again (6/21/2013 2:59:57 AM)

If it was a US Navy ship there is no way it could have been kept secret. Every single soul on the ship would know and it just isn't likely that a whole crew would keep quiet about a live missile launch at the same time a US jetliner crashes.

BTW I was in the service when that Iranian jet was shot down. I had a friend on that ship. The Iranians were putting civilian transponders in their military jets and those same military transponders in the civilian jets. Their radar showed the plane as an Iranian F-14.




Rule -> RE: ALex strikes again (6/21/2013 4:20:13 AM)

I have read your posts 114-122 and your arguments are convincing.

I now know what happened to TWA Flight 800 - but I cannot tell you. I recommend to turn a blind eye to this unfortunate event.




Real0ne -> RE: ALex strikes again (6/21/2013 11:36:26 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

If it was a US Navy ship there is no way it could have been kept secret. Every single soul on the ship would know and it just isn't likely that a whole crew would keep quiet about a live missile launch at the same time a US jetliner crashes.

BTW I was in the service when that Iranian jet was shot down. I had a friend on that ship. The Iranians were putting civilian transponders in their military jets and those same military transponders in the civilian jets. Their radar showed the plane as an Iranian F-14.



says the king of grandiose assumptions.

Not true! More doublethink.

that argument is completely worn out, false, and at a minimum demonstrates complete ignorance how things are done in the big leagues.


no way they could do it without it getting out, then when there is a whistle blower they are FUCKING CONSPIRACY THEORISTS.

trying to swing is both ways as always and think peeps are that dumb






thompsonx -> RE: ALex strikes again (6/21/2013 4:43:24 PM)

quote:

You know, like Area 51. You had to have a top secret clearance to work the gate house and perimeter patrol,


Regulations prescribe that those guarding material must have the same clearance as the material guarded.

quote:

then those of us who actually were cleared to patrol inside checking locks, safes and stuff had a much higher clearance.

What clearances would those be?
How does one maintain one's security clearance after discharge.




thompsonx -> RE: ALex strikes again (6/21/2013 4:54:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


BTW I was in the service when that Iranian jet was shot down. I had a friend on that ship.


My barbers cousins boyfriend was on that ship also maybe he knows your friend.

quote:

The Iranians were putting civilian transponders in their military jets and those same military transponders in the civilian jets. Their radar showed the plane as an Iranian F-14.


A radar operator that cannot distinguish between a 747 and a f 14 is actually a janitor sitting in for the real radar operator who was taking a shit.
When they drug the plane load of dead bodies out of the drink did they find this fictional f14 transponder. Because if they did it would have prevented the u.s. from paying a buttload of money.




jlf1961 -> RE: ALex strikes again (6/22/2013 4:45:54 PM)

There are two radar systems in use in both civilian and military applications, primary radar systems measure only the range and bearing of targets by detecting reflected radio signals, but cannot identify the type of aircraft by radar reflection. SSR relies on targets equipped with a radar transponder, that replies to each interrogation signal by transmitting a response containing encoded data. SSR is based on the military identification friend or foe.

In other words, identifying an aircraft simply by radar return is about as accurate as determining the sex of an unborn child based on the size of the expectant mother's abdomen.

Since the return on a radar screen is basically a moving dot, the operator depends on the aircraft's transponder to indicate aircraft type, contrary to what the movies might expect you to believe.




DomKen -> RE: ALex strikes again (6/22/2013 4:51:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

There are two radar systems in use in both civilian and military applications, primary radar systems measure only the range and bearing of targets by detecting reflected radio signals, but cannot identify the type of aircraft by radar reflection. SSR relies on targets equipped with a radar transponder, that replies to each interrogation signal by transmitting a response containing encoded data. SSR is based on the military identification friend or foe.

In other words, identifying an aircraft simply by radar return is about as accurate as determining the sex of an unborn child based on the size of the expectant mother's abdomen.

Since the return on a radar screen is basically a moving dot, the operator depends on the aircraft's transponder to indicate aircraft type, contrary to what the movies might expect you to believe.

Is thompsonx disputing reality again? I finally had to put him on ignore.




jlf1961 -> RE: ALex strikes again (6/22/2013 5:03:56 PM)

It would seem that some people think that what they see on the movies, with some RO looking up from his screen and yelling what kind of aircraft, altitude and speed is reality.




DomKen -> RE: ALex strikes again (6/22/2013 8:39:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

It would seem that some people think that what they see on the movies, with some RO looking up from his screen and yelling what kind of aircraft, altitude and speed is reality.

Air targeting radar can give you altitude and air search radar can get speed by marking the returns position one sweep to the next. I would assume computers handle the speed thing now.

But without the transponder you are left with blip size as the only way to tell a jetliner from a fighter jet and nobody pulls out calipers in C3 to identify a return. Civilian aircraft are required by international treaty to have a transponder that responds to all queries with correct information.




Real0ne -> RE: ALex strikes again (6/23/2013 9:22:32 AM)

and blip size does not count when talking about stealth technology.




jlf1961 -> RE: ALex strikes again (6/23/2013 1:36:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

You know, like Area 51. You had to have a top secret clearance to work the gate house and perimeter patrol,


Regulations prescribe that those guarding material must have the same clearance as the material guarded.

quote:

then those of us who actually were cleared to patrol inside checking locks, safes and stuff had a much higher clearance.

What clearances would those be?
How does one maintain one's security clearance after discharge.



Work in the consulting field for defense contractors, among other things.




PeonForHer -> RE: ALex strikes again (6/23/2013 3:36:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

We occasionally have colonials over so that there's somebody to mock in a condescending English fashion: why do you think the media should be any different to the posher parts of London?


I actually do believe that some of that was involved in getting this cuckoo clock on the show in the first place. The Beeb contacted some US media people and asked, 'What's this Jones like? We don't want a droner, we want a loonie. Nobody watches Andrew Neill's tedious programme so it needs one of your headbanging celebrities to spice it up. Ideally, it'd be one of your goosestepping ultra-right-wing women with dazzling teeth and big knockers, but a particularly fire-blowing conspiracy theorist would do as second best'.





Lucylastic -> RE: ALex strikes again (6/23/2013 3:46:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

We occasionally have colonials over so that there's somebody to mock in a condescending English fashion: why do you think the media should be any different to the posher parts of London?


I actually do believe that some of that was involved in getting this cuckoo clock on the show in the first place. The Beeb contacted some US media people and asked, 'What's this Jones like? We don't want a droner, we want a loonie. Nobody watches Andrew Neill's tedious programme so it needs one of your headbanging celebrities to spice it up. Ideally, it'd be one of your goosestepping ultra-right-wing women with dazzling teeth and big knockers, but a particularly fire-blowing conspiracy theorist would do as second best'.



Probably the closest thing ive heard to the possible truth!!!!!!!





DomKen -> RE: ALex strikes again (6/23/2013 5:57:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

You know, like Area 51. You had to have a top secret clearance to work the gate house and perimeter patrol,


Regulations prescribe that those guarding material must have the same clearance as the material guarded.

quote:

then those of us who actually were cleared to patrol inside checking locks, safes and stuff had a much higher clearance.

What clearances would those be?
How does one maintain one's security clearance after discharge.



Work in the consulting field for defense contractors, among other things.

I maintained my TS for several years after I left the service. It was actually a hiring plus at IBM. I could do work on government contracts without needing a full background investigation.




ShaharThorne -> RE: ALex strikes again (6/23/2013 6:03:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

quote:

'Idiot’ Bilderberg conspiracy theorist Alex Jones disrupts BBC politics show
Bilderberg conspiracy theorist Alex Jones flew into an uncontrollable tirade live on the BBC’s flagship politics programme after host Andrew Neil described him as an “idiot”.

Mr Jones, who runs a conspiracy theory website, began shouting and ranting after the Sunday Politics host told him to “shut it”.

As he screamed “freedom will not stop, you will not stop freedom” Mr Neil tried to bring the show to a close, telling him he was the worst guest ever, then stifling a laugh and pulling faces as he said: “We have an idiot on the programme today.”
Video of Alex Jones


For those who may not know, Alex Jones is one of the patron saints of the conspiracy theorists' subculture in the US.

Personally, I think the BBC made a mistake inviting him on the show, surely they did not expect him to act like a sane individual.



I know Alex personally. I loved the way he attacked Piers Morgan. If I was back in Austin, we would be having a few drinks, discussing about the state of the world.

He has his views, I have mine. We have this agreement to disagree at times. Isn't the 1st Amendment grand?




Real0ne -> RE: ALex strikes again (6/23/2013 8:05:26 PM)

morgan looked like a total british reject!

Oh wait thats what he is....lol




thompsonx -> RE: ALex strikes again (6/24/2013 7:38:23 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

There are two radar systems in use in both civilian and military applications, primary radar systems measure only the range and bearing of targets by detecting reflected radio signals, but cannot identify the type of aircraft by radar reflection.


Fatuous bullshit which is true on the whole but not the whole truth.
All gta radars have a rrd (range rate dscriminator) which allows the radar to display range, altitude,direction,speed,proximity to other aircraft and relative size of the aircrft displayed.




quote:

SSR relies on targets equipped with a radar transponder, that replies to each interrogation signal by transmitting a response containing encoded data. SSR is based on the military identification friend or foe.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655

"the documentary confirmed that the airliner was transmitting an Identification friend or foe code for a civilian aircraft, but Captain William C. Rogers III in an interview insisted that he believed the code alone did not mean the aircraft was non-hostile."

quote:

In other words, identifying an aircraft simply by radar return is about as accurate as determining the sex of an unborn child based on the size of the expectant mother's abdomen.


Again true on the whole but not the whole truth. While one cannot tell an f 14 from an f4 one can certainly tell an airbus from an f 14.

quote:

Since the return on a radar screen is basically a moving dot, the operator depends on the aircraft's transponder to indicate aircraft type, contrary to what the movies might expect you to believe.


My knowledge comes not from the movies but from years of experience with an apq/94 which is stone age compared to what was on the vincinnes.




thompsonx -> RE: ALex strikes again (6/24/2013 7:45:49 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

It would seem that some people think that what they see on the movies, with some RO looking up from his screen and yelling what kind of aircraft, altitude and speed is reality.

Air targeting radar can give you altitude and air search radar can get speed by marking the returns position one sweep to the next. I would assume computers handle the speed thing now.

Wrong again...air to air fire control radar in the 60's could do that with multiple targets.

quote:

But without the transponder



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655

"the documentary confirmed that the airliner was transmitting an Identification friend or foe code for a civilian aircraft, but Captain William C. Rogers III in an interview insisted that he believed the code alone did not mean the aircraft was non-hostile."


quote:

you are left with blip size as the only way to tell a jetliner from a fighter jet and nobody pulls out calipers in C3 to identify a return. Civilian aircraft are required by international treaty to have a transponder that responds to all queries with correct information.


Which the cite above shows it did.




jlf1961 -> RE: ALex strikes again (6/24/2013 8:05:03 AM)

As far as the Iranian airliner is concerned, it happened, it was a general fuckup on our part, and it will probably happen again.

As far as TWA 800, when the witness statements were gone over, their description of the streaks they saw did not relate to any obsevance of a night launch of an anti aircraft missile.

After reading about the instances of empty fuel tanks exploding due to wiring being chaffed and arcing, I would say it is a possibility. Considering they found no explosive residue on any of the wreckage, and the fact the explosion started from inside the aircraft in the area of the fuel tank, it is a toss up as to the actual cause of the explosion.

Do I think there is some great conspiracy involved, no, not really.




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 6 [7]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.201172E-02