Aswad
Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: graceadieu Snowden is losing credibility by fleeing to other countries, but at the same time, to give him the benefit of the doubt.... You got this backwards. The USA lost credibility by filing sealed charges against him. That's essentially on par with saying you want to try him in a secret court with secret judges on secret charges of breaking secret laws, with secret evidence (and, in saying so, you would be more accurate than anything Fox ever reported and more honest than any campaign promise ever made). Furthermore, you're losing credibility by showing yourselves to engage in everything you've accused other countries of doing, just more of it. Snowden has lost no credibility through his actions. Fleeing to other countries allows Snowden to continue to release information on things the American public absolutely should know and discuss. And it allows him to stand by his statements and back them up, so his allegations cannot be readily dismissed. The ACLU is already bringing a suit against NSA, and hoping to push it up to SCOTUS to enable them to find these practices unconstitutional and, thus, null and void. If that succeeds, Snowden will be guilty of no crime, and can "safely" return to the USA. Nobody outside the USA seriously questions Snowden's credibility or motives. On motives, the man had a highly paid job in Hawai'i, with great benefits and a career track that would really take him places. He gave that up for a life of persecution and the distinct possibility that he and/or his family may one day just "disappear", all so he could alert the American public to the (to him) unconscienable and unconstitutional state of affairs he objects to, something the Nuremberg principle establishes that all men are called to do, whatever the law of the land. Motivewise, this man is a hero on par with most any you've ever had. On credibility, he has released only the pertinent information, unlike B. Manning, and released it to a reputable partner in a manner that accomplishes his goals without endangering anyone. The people he accuses were quick to dismiss what he said as lies, then immediately proved themselves wrong by bringing charges that can only be valid if he was telling the truth. The things he said have since been corroborated by several sources, including partners in the criticized programme, and sources in the intelligence community. His credibility is beyond reproach at this point. And any country should be honored to extend asylum to him. Among currently mentioned candidates are Iceland, Cuba², Ecuador and so forth. Unlike what some have suggested, he is not in Russia¹. In Europe, when you're at an airport, you're not formally speaking in the country, you're in international territory, and you don't need a passport, a visa or anything to make your connecting flight, so long as you don't pass the clearly marked barrier that seperates the domestic part of the airport from the international part of the airport, which he has yet to do. For all intents and purposes, he's never been in Russia, isn't in Russia, and will never be in Russia. I hope the tweet we received earlier today that Snowden will arive Oslo/Gardermoen Luftavn (OGL) airport in Norway shortly is correct. Norway, legally (indeed, constitutionally), cannot extradite to the USA for four different reasons, each independently sufficient: (a) few, if any, of the American prisons meet the minimum standards required by our human rights laws, (b) Snowden would probably face penalties harsher than our extradition laws allow, (c) Snowden might theoretically face the death penalty, (d) the charges meet our criterion for persecution, as opposed to a criminal process under the rule of law. If anything, the man will likely be assigned units to prevent "unilateral extradition" (i.e. kidnapping). As former president Bill Clinton put it, «Free people will always look to Norway», though I'm inclined to disagree with him on that (freer than the USA, sure, but that doesn't take much). Probably, though, this is just another of a long series of carefully planned false trails. Now, ask yourself this: what would it take for you to be willing to leave the perfect life and then go through all this hassle before living with a bullseye painted on your back- and potentially the backs of your family members- for the rest of your life? To take on one of the most resourceful and omnipresent opponents you could possibly go up against with no chance to defend yourself in any meaningful way, except through eluding capture for a while so you can expose what it is that made you leave? Snowden's a bright guy, so he's thought this through, carefully, and done everything right so far. No, he hasn't lost an ounce of credibility, not in any way, shape or form. He's the gold standard of credibility right now. IWYW, — Aswad. ¹ I'm assuming everyone heard that Russia has rejected the extradition request on the grounds that Snowden is still in the international transit zone at Sjeremetjevo airport. ² Cuba doesn't seem likely, since he wasn't aboard the plane that was booked for him, as verified by several reporters.
< Message edited by Aswad -- 6/24/2013 4:12:20 PM >
_____________________________
"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind. From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way. We do." -- Rorschack, Watchmen.
|