quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

If George had stayed in/at his car, the boy would have made it home.





There would have been no incident.




There is no denying that.

If his response to what are you doing here had been I just moved in with my dad instead of attacking Zimmerman he would still be alive. No denying that.

The kid was walking home from the store, minding his own business......just like millions of kids do every day....


The killer was NOT minding his own business and fucked up because of that, big time.

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

Are folks actually watching the whole trial?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

Well, there are a lot of people with peculiar minds that frequent this website and these forums...

I find it quite interesting that they cannot discern truth nor reality.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin

ummmm since he is neighborhood watch, watching kinda IS his business

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

So now we are going to be left with the 2 (a) scenario, at what point did he try desperately to get away from him? If he did not try before on the ground, or madly while on the ground (and there would be some hella evidence on Martin) I would say that the statute says, he is as fucked as xaviera hollander.

There is case law in Florida where the appellate court ruled that simply being staggered or off balance was sufficient to not have a reasonable ability to retreat. So being on the ground with Trayvon on top, as was established in trial today, has George covered.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

So now we are going to be left with the 2 (a) scenario, at what point did he try desperately to get away from him? If he did not try before on the ground, or madly while on the ground (and there would be some hella evidence on Martin) I would say that the statute says, he is as fucked as xaviera hollander.

There is case law in Florida where the appellate court ruled that simply being staggered or off balance was sufficient to not have a reasonable ability to retreat. So being on the ground with Trayvon on top, as was established in trial today, has George covered.

Hardly. He made no attempt (by his own admission) to retreat at all, he confronted. That's why the case is not looking good for him.


And I doubt that is what exactly that appellate case said, perhaps you could show me a link to that case.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

If George had stayed in/at his car, the boy would have made it home.





There would have been no incident.




There is no denying that.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

ROFLMAO

The undisputed testimony is that he did make it home.

Yup.

About 20-30 feet from his own back door.......where the killer followed him......many hundreds feet from his own car....


Do the math.

~~~~~~~~~~~

Just saw this.......West`s next gaff to apologize for.......

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

There is nothing in evidence to demonstrate George confronted anyone after a week of trial. And if he did, the duty to retreat would be at when the use of force occurred, at which time George was pinned to the ground.

That's why legal analysts are becoming increasingly vocal as the trial continues that George is likely to be acquitted.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

There is nothing in evidence to demonstrate George confronted anyone after a week of trial. And if he did, the duty to retreat would be at when the use of force occurred, at which time George was pinned to the ground.

That's why legal analysts are becoming increasingly vocal as the trial continues that George is likely to be acquitted.

So Martin rushed up to Zimmerman who wasn't following him and attacked him for absolutely no reason and with no warning. An attack so fast and devastating that Zimmerman was immediately on his back and helpless to defend himself except by drawing a gun and killing Martin.

Is that really what you're claiming?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

So now we are going to be left with the 2 (a) scenario, at what point did he try desperately to get away from him? If he did not try before on the ground, or madly while on the ground (and there would be some hella evidence on Martin) I would say that the statute says, he is as fucked as xaviera hollander.

There is case law in Florida where the appellate court ruled that simply being staggered or off balance was sufficient to not have a reasonable ability to retreat. So being on the ground with Trayvon on top, as was established in trial today, has George covered.

Hardly. He made no attempt (by his own admission) to retreat at all, he confronted. That's why the case is not looking good for him.


And I doubt that is what exactly that appellate case said, perhaps you could show me a link to that case.

There is nothing in evidence to demonstrate George confronted anyone after a week of trial. And if he did, the duty to retreat would be at when the use of force occurred, at which time George was pinned to the ground.

That's why legal analysts are becoming increasingly vocal as the trial continues that George is likely to be acquitted.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

So now we are going to be left with the 2 (a) scenario, at what point did he try desperately to get away from him? If he did not try before on the ground, or madly while on the ground (and there would be some hella evidence on Martin) I would say that the statute says, he is as fucked as xaviera hollander.

There is case law in Florida where the appellate court ruled that simply being staggered or off balance was sufficient to not have a reasonable ability to retreat. So being on the ground with Trayvon on top, as was established in trial today, has George covered.

Hardly. He made no attempt (by his own admission) to retreat at all, he confronted. That's why the case is not looking good for him.


And I doubt that is what exactly that appellate case said, perhaps you could show me a link to that case.

There is nothing in evidence to demonstrate George confronted anyone after a week of trial. And if he did, the duty to retreat would be at when the use of force occurred, at which time George was pinned to the ground.

That's why legal analysts are becoming increasingly vocal as the trial continues that George is likely to be acquitted.

Well, of course this is asswipe, much like your very ignorant round of asswipe regarding stand your ground........uh, he did more than stand his ground, he stood someone elses, thats why that was a loser from the get go. that was a walk, wasn't it?

Yeah, there is some iffy whether or not he will meet the statute as I have posted.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Well, George starting out at his car and ending up just behind the kids home tells normal folks that he closed the distance between them.......ie pursued him.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Exactly. So like I said, the noble stand your ground defense yiu put up and was such a winner turned into a dog. The legal analysts are pretty much wrong, because it was already ruled that it has no bearing since Geo didnt know anything about Martin. And it would hurt his case more than help to bring it up.