Toysinbabeland -> RE: If abortion is murder . . . (7/1/2013 6:38:29 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: egern quote:
ORIGINAL: Aswad quote:
ORIGINAL: tazzygirl The fail rate for condoms is higher than the pill. Two percent with perfect use. I strive for perfection. [:D] Still, point made. And yours enhances mine: using one is doing my part. I take precautions against consequences I want to avoid. So should she. I've never hidden the fact that I don't intend to raise or support children, and that my consent to sex is contingent on her acceptance of that. I take precautions to reduce the risk of STD transmission and unwanted pregnancies, including use of condoms at minimum. I know the risk (legally imposed, so an added, non-preexisting one) I'm taking in having sex. She knows the risk (biologically inherent) she's taking in having sex, and the conditions of consent on my end. If she draws the "winning" numbers in the lottery, she can keep what I "gave" her if she wants to, or get rid of it if she doesn't. That, too, is clear up front. If she hasn't agreed to it, sex isn't happening. Though, that's enough about me. I was trying to make a general point, and apparently failing at it. IWYW, — Aswad. In short, you argue that since women have the body that gets pregnant, it is ok for men to have the fun, but not take the consequences if - in spite of precautions - she gets pregnant. Doesn't sound right to me, especially not these days where in so many places you simply cannot get an abortion. Actually, it's refreshing that Aswad is so clear. If both agree to engage in a sexual act that could result in pregnancy, regardless of precautions, He abdicates both responsibility and choice. If you don't like his terms, you don't participate. He also gives up the right to the child completely. He's not saying don't have it, he's saying he won't acknowledge it.
|
|
|
|